- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:47 am to LSUnivFan
Kagan isnt even buying it.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:47 am to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s a great way to piss all nine of them off. I’ve heard state district judges threaten to expel lawyers from the courtroom because they won’t shut up. I can only imagine how much worse that would be at SCOTUS.
It speaks to the younger generation of lawyers who are so self-absorbed and insulated due to growing up with no social interaction that they never learned how to talk to others and respect those with authority. The fact this dipshit went to Harvard just a few years ago only confirms how entitled this guy is.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:47 am to Fun Bunch
Unlike Captain Kirk and his solution to the Kobayashi Maru, “it had the virtue of never being tried” isn’t going to get them a commendation for original thinking.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:48 am to NCIS_76
His entire argument balances delicately on the assumption that Trump committed a clear crime that no one, including him, has even been charged with.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:48 am to MrLSU
quote:
The fact this dipshit went to Harvard just a few years ago only confirms how entitled this guy is.
This guy clerked for Kagan at SCOTUS and Gorsuch on the 10th circuit. And they are both reaming him out like a cheap porn star.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:49 am to Bwmdx
quote:
I’m fairly ignorant of how this works. But, do the justices have a private session where they discuss/debate issues related to the case or is it only during oral arguments?
This case was argued in the briefs filed by the parties in this case. Oral arguments are for the justices to get questions in the record. They will vote on this privately, probably today. Who knows when decision will be released other than before Colorado election.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:49 am to Fun Bunch
“What’s a state doing deciding who other people get to vote for for President?”
Kagan continues to ask the seminal question.
She’s not my favorite Justice, but she’s bringing the heat with this singular point.
Respect.
Kagan continues to ask the seminal question.
She’s not my favorite Justice, but she’s bringing the heat with this singular point.
Respect.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:50 am to WPBTiger
Normally, arguments heard today are held for an opinion release months down the road.
This seems like the kind of case where they don’t follow normal procedure.
This seems like the kind of case where they don’t follow normal procedure.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:50 am to MrLSU
quote:
It speaks to the younger generation of lawyers who are so self-absorbed and insulated due to growing up with no social interaction that they never learned how to talk to others and respect those with authority. The fact this dipshit went to Harvard just a few years ago only confirms how entitled this guy is.
This dumbass is refusing to pivot to secondary or tertiary arguments. He is forging ahead despite the fact that they are clearly not buying it. Colorado is going to lose unless something changes here, but he doesn't appear to be willing to try anything else.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:51 am to EKG
quote:
Kagan continues to ask the seminal question. She’s not my favorite Justice, but she’s bringing the heat with this singular point. Respect.
Kagan is a leftist but one who understands the law.
I see this being 7-2 with her voting with the majority while dumb and dumber vote for Colorado.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:52 am to EKG
Despite being a complete Prog, Kagan is someone people at least respect.
She somewhat deserves to be there and can be reasonable, even if I disagree with her a lot.
Soto and Kentaji don't deserve to be there and suck.
She somewhat deserves to be there and can be reasonable, even if I disagree with her a lot.
Soto and Kentaji don't deserve to be there and suck.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:56 am to Fun Bunch
I have heard enough that Colorado will lose this. Justices are not buying this and just said the is a vehicle to find Trump guilty of insurrection and he has NOT been charged. Seems case is over right there. He isn't guilty therefore can't be barred.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:56 am to UAinSOUTHAL
We don't have a Constitutional Democracy. 
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:56 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
but is not the core concern = "first - is what happened on J6 really an insurrection - under what definition - under what determination - under what action taken in response? "second - IF there really is a technical finding of 'yes - it was an insurrection' - THEN - did Trump participate in the 'insurrecction' or did he incite the 'insurrection'?
Actually that is what the original trial had in Colorado
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:57 am to UAinSOUTHAL
You can't always tell in oral argument. I had to argue once before the LASpCrt and they peppered me and obliterated me with questions, barely asked my opponent a single one. I won unanimously (on very technical grounds).
But in this case, you can tell
CO gets slapped the frick down
But in this case, you can tell
CO gets slapped the frick down
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:00 am to MrLSU
damn. KJB just bodied this kid.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:02 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
damn. KJB just bodied this kid.
I was not expecting that from her.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:05 am to NCIS_76
Stevenson steps up to the gallows ….
Page 7 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News