Started By
Message
locked post

Laura Ingraham says what we all know. WaPo article is fake news

Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:15 pm
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167230 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:15 pm
quote:

WH source with direct knowledge just told me @washingtonpost didn't talk to ANY U.S. official at mtg w/ Lavrov. "It's Fake News"


LINK
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37520 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:17 pm to
Posted by TheHumanTornado
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2008
3764 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:18 pm to
So how is she more reliable? Because she likes your guy?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:19 pm to
What if the source of the leak was Russian? And the Russians did it to frick with us. And our retards ran with it because they are retards.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:19 pm to
#VeryFakeNews
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:19 pm to
This is why this is all so fricking dumb
Posted by Langland
Trumplandia
Member since Apr 2014
15382 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:19 pm to
Libs are so cute when they melt.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:20 pm to
and you know this how, oh wait trumps people (known liars) said so
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167230 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

So how is she more reliable? Because she likes your guy?





Unlike the WaPo, she doesn't have a history of spreading fake news.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48939 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

What if the source of the leak was Russian? And the Russians did it to frick with us. And our retards ran with it because they are retards


Possible.

Or someone in the nsa or CIA leaked this info to make it look like it actually happened
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

So how is she more reliable? Because she likes your guy?
I don't know what to believe, but the WaPo journalists aren't some random journalists looking for their first big break. They've both win Pullitzer's for their reporting on Defense and National Security.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72063 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

So how is she more reliable?
She isn't. Her anonymous source affords her the same scrutiny as the WaPo one.

Without actual verification, her information is just as likely "fake news".
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9415 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Laura Ingraham says


Well that settles it
Posted by TheHumanTornado
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2008
3764 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:22 pm to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67866 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

how is she more reliable?


you misogynist bastard
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

don't know what to believe, but the WaPo journalists aren't some random journalists looking for their first big break. They've both win Pullitzer's for their reporting on Defense and National Security.



Spin prog filth, spin!
Posted by Tigerbait337
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2008
20535 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:24 pm to
Which article is this?
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12066 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

What if the source of the leak was Russian? And the Russians did it to frick with us. And our retards ran with it because they are retards.


Thats it! We need Trump to appoint a special committee to investigate WAPO collusion with muh Russians.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

She isn't. Her anonymous source affords her the same scrutiny as the WaPo one.

Without actual verification, her information is just as likely "fake news".
And to the best of my knowledge, neither Ingram nor the WaPo journalists are known for poor reporting. In other words, both probably have legitimate sources; however, I think the WaPo source is taking a disproportionately larger risk--potentially criminal--that's a lot to risk if it's a lie.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37520 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:28 pm to
WaPo. More like WaPoop
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram