- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kevin Clinesmith – Criminal Information….
Posted on 8/15/20 at 9:59 am
Posted on 8/15/20 at 9:59 am
quote:Can we revisit who it was that told us a grand jury was empaneled? So we know to never listen to them again.
It’s not an indictment, it’s a Criminal Information with no grand jury, which suggests counsel for defendant approached DOJ to structure an agreement. The plea agreement likely also included an agreement for method of public release. [LINK HERE] Last year John Spiropoulos explained the Clinesmith information for OAN TV. WATCH
LINK
Poli board lawyers please explain "Criminal Information with no grand jury"
9
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:02 am to cajunangelle
quote:
"Criminal Information with no grand jury"
With an Information, the defendant agrees to allow the prosecutor to file the charges this way, waiver of indictment. Felonies need to go before a grand jury unless the defendant agrees to the filing of a Bill of Information, usually done when cooperating. All misdemeanors can be filed by a Bill of Information without a grand jury.
This post was edited on 8/15/20 at 10:05 am
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:04 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Can we revisit who it was that told us a grand jury was empaneled? So we know to never listen to them again.
I don't think this necessarily means that there is no grand jury.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:15 am to BoarEd
Your thread last night had some of the best replies I have ever read on this forum. A good time was had by all. Some sensitive sally's are so self important on this board they got the thread anchored.
It is a shame.
It is a shame.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:18 am to BoarEd
What I am trying to wrap my head around is Barr's comments here and there. 'The courts were slowed down by covid,' led many--in their mind's eye-- to picture grand juries for Brennan on down slowed by covid.
This post was edited on 8/15/20 at 10:19 am
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:23 am to WPBTiger
quote:Meaning telling who ordered you to do the crime?
filing of a Bill of Information, usually done when cooperating
It has been quoted that Clinesmith's lawyer said it was a mistake an error, as in a typo.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:34 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Your thread last night had some of the best replies I have ever read on this forum.
Last night you were openly laughing at BoarEd in that thread. Remember the stupid "bwaaahaha" emoticon?
Yet today, you think it was "one of the best threads ever"??? Seriously, how many different faces do you have?
Do some research and find out what LAW PROFESSOR Jonathan Turley had to say regarding the huge significance of what happened yesterday.
Jonathan Turley vs. CajunAngelle
Geez, it's a really tough call but I think I'm going to put just a little bit more weight behind Professor Turley's comments.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:36 am to cajunangelle
@cajunangelle.
Go read my post on the main board about the footnote in the Mueller report.
You're going to love it.
Looks like Muellers SC knew what Clinesmith was doing and covered their a$$e$
Go read my post on the main board about the footnote in the Mueller report.
You're going to love it.
Looks like Muellers SC knew what Clinesmith was doing and covered their a$$e$
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:50 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Can we revisit who it was that told us a grand jury was empaneled? So we know to never listen to them again.
Probably go after John Solomon, then...
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:51 am to KCT
quote:
Yet today, you think it was "one of the best threads ever"??? Seriously, how many different faces do you have?
CA is cra cra baw...no need to drag your nuts all over a sweet ol' loon who's trying her best
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:53 am to cajunangelle
Considering an impeachment came of this investigation and Clinesmith was falsifying documents for that impeachment to happen.......why isn't treason being thrown around with this?
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:54 am to KCT
I didn't take any of that as her laughing at me. She was just poking fun at the entire thing. I didn't take it personally.
This post was edited on 8/15/20 at 11:01 am
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:55 am to cajunangelle
I doubt he has ever mentioned it but Libby Hank is an attorney.
I’m sure he will be along shortly to explain how Clinesmith out foxed Durham.
I’m sure he will be along shortly to explain how Clinesmith out foxed Durham.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:56 am to cajunangelle
quote:
It has been quoted that Clinesmith's lawyer said it was a mistake an error, as in a typo.
They're trying to spin it that Clinesmith was given wrong information that Page wasn't a US asset and this caused him to alter the email/FISA.
The issue with this, as always, goes back to the FISA court process(ex parte, etc). and how the information in there is sworn and true and corroborated.
This was clearly planned. But is it enough to charge Comey, McCabe, and other who signed off on the blatantly wrong FISA docs without showing intent? We'll see.
Someone needs to flip to bring down the big fish.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:56 am to boomtown143
The Grand Jury does not have to be seated in Washington DC.
Huber had one in Utah.
Durham has one in Connecticut.
Clinesmith and his Attorney can be interviewed...anywhere, including a Holiday Inn Express.
Durham simply dropped the documentation in their lap and gave them an out in order to get to the top dog. Clinesmith rolled in order to keep from sharing a cell with Bubba the love sponge.
Huber had one in Utah.
Durham has one in Connecticut.
Clinesmith and his Attorney can be interviewed...anywhere, including a Holiday Inn Express.
Durham simply dropped the documentation in their lap and gave them an out in order to get to the top dog. Clinesmith rolled in order to keep from sharing a cell with Bubba the love sponge.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 10:57 am to boomtown143
quote:I will look for it, thanks.
Looks like Muellers SC knew what Clinesmith was doing and covered their a$$e$
So will Barr allow his BFF honest Bob to be in criminal trouble?
All of this corruption is really surreal. We need to burn it all down.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 11:02 am to BoarEd
quote:
I didn't take any of that as her laughing at me.
Well, she was. Quite a few posters were, in fact.
For 5he record, I wasn't laughing at you. I simply disagreed with you that President Trump's answer constituted a confirmation of Q. I understood your point, and you and I both know the answer, but for the naysayers it has to be more definitive than that.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 11:03 am to cajunangelle
They've got a grand jury empaneled to present evidence whenever it's necessary. Grand jury goes about their lives until such time as they're called upon to do their duty. Same grand jury would be utilized in any and all individual cases wherein indictment is sought. If I had to guess I would say there has indeed been evidence presented to the GJ, and it's not necessarily a all-in-one thing. They could meet several times in connection with a single matter. Also, sealed indictments aren't uncommon. It's possible the GJ has already returned indictments in a particular matter(s) and the unsealing of the indictment(s) is upcoming. That's done for any number of strategic purposes.
Posted on 8/15/20 at 11:12 am to KCT
quote:There is something wrong with you; if I have to explain this to someone that schools everyone and wins every day. You enjoy the fighting you always have. The thread healed the Q division you live for.
Last night you were openly laughing at BoarEd in that thread. Remember the stupid "bwaaahaha" emoticon?
Yet today, you think it was "one of the best threads ever"??? Seriously, how many different faces do you have?
quote:Re: Turley, another whooooosh
Do some research and find out what LAW PROFESSOR Jonathan Turley had to say regarding the huge significance of what happened yesterday.
Jonathan Turley vs. CajunAngelle
Geez, it's a really tough call but I think I'm going to put just a little bit more weight behind Professor Turley's comments.
I read Turley's article (did you?) it is mostly about revisiting muh Russia. This thread is another convoluted sub-topic.
I have hired an attorney (Davy or Boosie) whichever gets my retainer fee first; and have just been advised to continue ignoring you. Some here don't know your history. Those of us that do will refrain from further comment.
This post was edited on 8/15/20 at 11:23 am
Posted on 8/15/20 at 11:16 am to KCT
quote:
Well, she was. Quite a few posters were, in fact
Doesn't really bother me. It won't dissuade me from posting things I find to be pertinent. I can handle quite a bit of Joshin' around. It only bothers me when people are blatantly disrespectful when I have given them no reason to be.
I don't get upset when people make their code jokes or whatever because even I admit that that aspect of the Q thing is pretty out there. (I still work on the decodes though
) In short, if people are trying to troll me with shite like that they're gonna need to come up with better material.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News