Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Kelly Ayotte

Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:04 am
Posted by Rakim
Member since Nov 2015
9954 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:04 am
Curious about the chances of her becoming Trumps pick to replace Kennedy? I have a feeling Trump may feel as though he owes Ayotte for what happened in Senate race in 2016 and the way she has backed him 100% since election including guiding Gorsuch through his Senate confirmation. The logic also makes sense in that the Republicans need to place a woman on the bench eventually and with this pick you get a woman in Kelly Ayotte at 48.

Also the Senate kind of likes the idea of having one of their own on the bench and Kagan was as much a political appointment as there ever was in my lifetime. Also Kagan had never been a judge or argued a case at the SCOTUS until she was appointed Solicitor General. Ayotte has argued in front of the Supreme Court before as NH's AG.

I'm not saying this is a good or bad pick but I have this feeling she will be on the list.

LINK

ETA: There is zero talk or articles about Ayotte. I just want to examine the possibility.
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 12:07 am
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67005 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:05 am to
Should be Napolitano
Posted by Rakim
Member since Nov 2015
9954 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:07 am to
Imagine for a second that the Republicans want or feel they need a woman on the court.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41644 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:07 am to
Not familiar with her from the perspective of a court nominee but I didn't see her name on Trump's list.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16991 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:14 am to
Even though she has a law degree and has served as a state AG, she wouldn't be my pick. She is too involved in politics considering she was a U.S. Senator and has all that special interest lobbying baggage that I wouldn't want a SCOTUS judge bringing to the bench.
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 12:15 am
Posted by djmicrobe
Planet Earth
Member since Jan 2007
4970 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:18 am to
Would he pick Scalise?
Posted by Rakim
Member since Nov 2015
9954 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:21 am to
quote:

Even though she has a law degree and has served as a state AG, she wouldn't be my pick. She is too involved in politics considering she was a U.S. Senator and has all that special interest lobbying baggage that I wouldn't want a SCOTUS judge bringing to the bench.


Then that eliminates Mike Lee and Ted Cruz by that logic.
Posted by Rakim
Member since Nov 2015
9954 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:23 am to
quote:

Would he pick Scalise?


I won't even dignify that question. I'm hoping it's sacrasm?
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:28 am to
quote:

I have a feeling Trump may feel as though he owes Ayotte for what happened in Senate race in 2016 and the way she has backed him 100% since election including guiding Gorsuch through his Senate confirmation. The logic also makes sense in that the Republicans need to place a woman on the bench eventually and with this pick you get a woman in Kelly Ayotte at 48.


As much as I like Ayotte, Trump doesn't owe her shite, and she has served no time on the bench. We need experienced conservative judges.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9082 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:40 am to
quote:

Curious about the chances of her becoming Trumps pick to replace Kennedy?


Damn. For a second, I thought Kennedy announced his retirement.

I've got a few hundred bucks riding on Kennedy on Predictit.

What a let down.

Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 7:39 am to
Say no to Amnesty Kelly
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26956 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Should be Napolitano


Andrew or Janet?
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Andrew or Janet?

It would take Janet six months to roll out a decision.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35952 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 8:26 am to
Ayotte was a neoconservative in the Senate. She in no way would be a judicial conservative and certainly isn't anywhere near being a constitutional originalist.
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5530 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Kelly Ayotte



Her biggest flaw, even more so than not being as conservative/originalist that one would expect the person that is nominated to be, is that she has never been a judge at any level, much less a federal judge. She simply doesn't have the resume. IMO it would be a terrible decision to nominate someone who has never served as a judge before. Preferably, you want someone who has served at the federal level.
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12640 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 9:53 am to
Does trump even like her? She bailed out on him in the fall and she got passed over for cabinet job.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram