- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Justice Scalia Believed Supreme Court was Being Surveilled by Obama
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:58 pm
quote:
Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox News senior judicial analyst, went on FOX Business Network on Monday to discuss allegations Senator Rand Paul and another senator were under surveillance by the Obama administration.
Napolitano also dropped a bomb on the Obama administration spying on the US Supreme Court.
Judge Napolitano: Justice Scalia told me that he often thought the court was being surveilled. And he told me that probably four or five years ago…If they had to unmask Senator Paul’s name to reveal a conversation he was having with a foreign agent and the foreign agent was hostile to the United States they can do that. That’s not what he’s talking about. They’re talking about unmasking him when he’s having a conversation with his campaign manager when he’s running in the Republican primary.
During the discussion Judge Napolitano also said Barack Obama could be subpoenaed to testify if he viewed the unmasked intelligence.
LINK
10
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:58 pm to stout
Who isn't being surveilled?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:59 pm to stout
After da judge's last debacle, only a fool wouldn't believe him.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:00 pm to stout
Probably why they had him killed.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:00 pm to Homesick Tiger
Seriously. The dude is money.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:02 pm to goldennugget
quote:Uhhh most folks. Resources are limited. Uninteresting people, however, are abundant.
Who isn't being surveilled?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:03 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Uhhh most folks. Resources are limited. Uninteresting people, however, are abundant.
Pretty sure I am on a watchlist or two
frick the NSA
frick the government's 4th amendment violating survaillance
Edward Snowden is a hero for letting us know the truth
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:05 pm to stout
Very convenient that he's making claims about q a dead man. That's pretty difficult to confirm.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:07 pm to goldennugget
quote:Are you?
Pretty sure I am on a watchlist or two
Just curious. How many pent-up 30yo virgins who entertain whacky conspiracy theories would you reckon there are in the largest Western country in the world?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:09 pm to goldennugget
Noted. We look forward to gaining a better understanding of just what you mean by "frick us."
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:14 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Uhhh most folks. Resources are limited. Uninteresting people, however, are abundant.
Then why dey got dem storage data facilities in Utah?
How about we are being monitored?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:17 pm to LSUwag
quote:
Very convenient that he's making claims about q a dead man. That's pretty difficult to confirm.
True, but it really makes the contortions Judge Roberts made to make the ACA the law of the land more interesting.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:22 pm to Navytiger74
Doesn't take a lot of resources to record conversations and text messages.
I know there are not enough resources or bureaucrats to listen to everything going on but key words and phrases are probably flagged and looked at.
Of this I have no doubt.
I know there are not enough resources or bureaucrats to listen to everything going on but key words and phrases are probably flagged and looked at.
Of this I have no doubt.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:23 pm to ruzil
quote:
True, but it really makes the contortions Judge Roberts made to make the ACA the law of the land more interesting
Edit..WIFI issues. I am probably on a watch list too. LOL
Anyway, it wasn't a tax until it was a "constitutional" tax that last night prior to the ruling.
Maybe Roberts has some unconventional hobbies that he had to protect? Things that make you go Hmm?
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:24 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Who isn't being surveilled?
Uhhh most folks. Resources are limited
So political candidates and SCOTUS justices are right in the wheelhouse.
Thanks for proving the point, polly.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:28 pm to stout
quote:
quote: Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox News senior judicial analyst, went on FOX Business Network on Monday to discuss allegations Senator Rand Paul and another senator were under surveillance by the Obama administration. Napolitano also dropped a bomb on the Obama administration spying on the US Supreme Court. Judge Napolitano: Justice Scalia told me that he often thought the court was being surveilled. And he told me that probably four or five years ago…If they had to unmask Senator Paul’s name to reveal a conversation he was having with a foreign agent and the foreign agent was hostile to the United States they can do that. That’s not what he’s talking about. They’re talking about unmasking him when he’s having a conversation with his campaign manager when he’s running in the Republican primary. During the discussion Judge Napolitano also said Barack Obama could be subpoenaed to testify if he viewed the unmasked intelligence.
Dear AG Sessions, do it or you do not have a hair on your balls.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:30 pm to stout
"There is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later turn into a judicial one."
- Alexis de Tocqueville
I'm sure the Supreme Court has been threatened, watched, anything to take down certain members since the beginning of John Marshall.
- Alexis de Tocqueville
I'm sure the Supreme Court has been threatened, watched, anything to take down certain members since the beginning of John Marshall.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:34 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:How much data do you think 250M adults and youths generate daily over various forms of media and communication? Storing it alone would be an enormous undertaking. Even with "keywords" how many people do you think it would take to sift through that? Again. It's not a discrete data-set. It's generated continuously.
Doesn't take a lot of resources to record conversations and text messages.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:35 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Dear AG Sessions, do it or you do not have a hair on your balls.
The republicans don't have anyone with the balls to question him even if he was supoenaed. Obama would make the republicans look stupid because they wouldn't dare ask the hard questions and back him in a corner.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:36 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
How much data do you think 250M adults and youths generate daily over various forms of media and communication? Storing it alone would be an enormous undertaking. Even with "keywords" how many people do you think it would take to shift through that? Again. It's not a discrete data-set. It's generated continuously.
So that makes it all OK! Because the chances of it being you who gets spied on is low!
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News