- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge won't excuse Trump to attend Supreme Court arguments
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:33 pm to geauxlsu07
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:33 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:
geauxlsu07
So you are good with Lawfare.
1
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:34 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Two words. Wheel of fortune style…RSTLNE.
E _ E _ _ T _ _ N _ N T E R _ E R E N _ E
You get two consonants and a vowel.
quote:I can certainly see the argument that there is selective prosecution here, and that this selective prosecution constitutes improper election interference. If that is your sole argument, so be it.
Two words. Wheel of fortune style…RSTLNE.
E _ E _ _ T _ _ N _ N T E R _ E R E N _ E
You get two consonants and a vowel.
But are you arguing ALSO that a requirement that a criminal Defendant be present for trial ... in and of itself ... constitutes improper election interference? That it is somehow improper to apply to Trump the same procedural rule that applies to every other individual criminal Defendant in the entire State of New York? Because I have trouble seeing any logic in that argument.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:38 pm to loogaroo
quote:
So you are good with Lawfare.
No…I just can’t understand a man who claims his innocence just doesn’t keep his mouth shut and go through the trial, be found innocent and have zero restrictions against him.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 9:18 pm to geauxlsu07
This has nothing to do with justice. These democrats are abusing government power for political and personal reasons.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 9:21 pm to FreedomBarefoot
It is lost on y'all that if he had kept his mushroom dick at home while Barron was four months old and not, you know, been out fricking a porn star, we wouldn't be here.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 9:46 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
Number of Posts: 19 Registered on: 4/15/2024
Posted on 4/15/24 at 9:49 pm to exiledhogfan
quote:
Occupation: lyin' fake media
Posted on 4/15/24 at 9:49 pm to chili pup
quote:
He's clearly left wing and has TDS.
Some may say he’s playing with fire
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:28 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
Well one is required the other (SCOTUS) he doesn’t have to be there
NY has an incredibly corrupt legal system and this judge was selected for his TDS persecution show trial of BS charges. All of these lawfare crooks should go to jail for abuse of power and denying Trump his constitutional and civil rights as well as election tampering.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:36 am to geauxlsu07
quote:
No…I just can’t understand a man who claims his innocence just doesn’t keep his mouth shut and go through the trial, be found innocent and have zero restrictions against him.
In a demprog show trial with a NY demprog jury over cooked up BS charges puffed up from a misdemeanor to a "felony" long past the statute of limitations conducted by a Soros DA who ran for office with the promise to "get Trump" and a hack leftist judge selected for his TDS! Oh yeah, that's your idea of America Stalinist style. 
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:53 am to OzonaOkapi
You are a typical libtard staying on your predetermined message taking the argument down into some extremely rare weeds. You refuse to vary your line of thought and discuss what every other person, who is not libtarded, is discussing.
The federal and blue state judiciary are selectively prosecuting President Trump in several different legal areas in different parts of the country. And wonder of wonder it is all happening within a year of the presidential election. Yet you are arguing one tiny litte section over a point that is incredibly minor to keep the focus off the big picture. The big picture, which everyone should be focusing on is our extremely corrupt leftarded federal government is trying to remove President Trump from the process because they know the people will vote him into office in a fair election.
So why do you carry the water for the criminals in Washington DC?
The federal and blue state judiciary are selectively prosecuting President Trump in several different legal areas in different parts of the country. And wonder of wonder it is all happening within a year of the presidential election. Yet you are arguing one tiny litte section over a point that is incredibly minor to keep the focus off the big picture. The big picture, which everyone should be focusing on is our extremely corrupt leftarded federal government is trying to remove President Trump from the process because they know the people will vote him into office in a fair election.
So why do you carry the water for the criminals in Washington DC?
Posted on 4/16/24 at 4:36 am to loogaroo
Trump needs to give the middle finger to this judge and make them arrest him. There will be no amount of cheating that could overcome that margin.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 4:49 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Not allowing him to attend his sons graduation seems spiteful and petty.
Would most criminal defendants be allowed to skip court for graduation?
Posted on 4/16/24 at 4:51 am to exiledhogfan
quote:
lost on y'all that if he had kept his mushroom dick at home while Barron was four months old and not, you know, been out fricking a porn star, we wouldn't be here.
The only ones expected to keep it in their pants here are women....no one cares if trump is fricking around on his family. He wasn't elected for being a good moral or godly individual.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 5:39 am to OzonaOkapi
quote:
The case is pending in a New York state trial court, not a federal court. State rules of procedure govern proceedings. The relevant state procedural rule states clearly and unambiguously that attendance is mandatory..
I posted the relevant New York rule on page 1 but let me do that for you again because it says the Judge can grant the defendant to not have to be personally present.\
New York Civil Practice Law & Rules Section 340.50 LINK
1. Except as provided in subdivision two or three, a defendant must be personally present during the trial.
2. On motion of a defendant represented by counsel, the court may, in the absence of an objection by the people, issue an order dispensing with the requirement that the defendant be personally present at trial. Such an order may be made only upon the filing of a written and subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he waives his right to be personally present at the trial and authorizing his attorney to conduct his defense.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 5:41 am to oklahogjr
quote:
The only ones expected to keep it in their pants here are women
It's almost as if female monogamy and male promiscuity are hallmarks of the vast majority of species on Earth.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 5:57 am to oklahogjr
Ahh, another progstain arrives. Welcome, retard.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 6:00 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
New York Civil Practice Law & Rules Section 340.50 LINK
1. Except as provided in subdivision two or three, a defendant must be personally present during the trial.
2. On motion of a defendant represented by counsel, the court may, in the absence of an objection by the people, issue an order dispensing with the requirement that the defendant be personally present at trial. Such an order may be made only upon the filing of a written and subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he waives his right to be personally present at the trial and authorizing his attorney to conduct his defense.
BETA Page
You keep posting this but I suspect there is a difference between civil and criminal trials....
Posted on 4/16/24 at 6:04 am to MFn GIMP
I highlighted the part of contention.
Based on that bolded part the relief is optional to the court (the term may) and the state must not object to the absence (absence of an objection by the people aka state prosecutors).
That could be their end around on this case, get Trump to skip out or get charged with a new felony or misdemeanor by the judge for failing to appear in court or contempt of court in this case.
quote:
On motion of a defendant represented by counsel, the court may, in the absence of an objection by the people, issue an order dispensing with the requirement that the defendant be personally present at trial. Such an order may be made only upon the filing of a written and subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he waives his right to be personally present at the trial and authorizing his attorney to conduct his defense.
Based on that bolded part the relief is optional to the court (the term may) and the state must not object to the absence (absence of an objection by the people aka state prosecutors).
That could be their end around on this case, get Trump to skip out or get charged with a new felony or misdemeanor by the judge for failing to appear in court or contempt of court in this case.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 6:15 am to exiledhogfan
quote:
It is lost on y'all that if he had kept his mushroom dick at home while Barron was four months old and not, you know, been out fricking a porn star, we wouldn't be here.
If you believe that then you’re a fricking idiot. They indicted him for taking out a loan and paying it back you fricking retard. They'd just make some other bullshite up.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News