- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jeff Sessions: An Attorney General to Restore the Rule of Law
Posted on 11/25/16 at 8:22 am
Posted on 11/25/16 at 8:22 am
quote:Also an update:
LINK
By Andrew C. McCarthy
I have only one complaint regarding the splendid news that President-elect Donald Trump will nominate Senator Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) to be the next attorney general of the United States: He is such a valuable legislator, he may be irreplaceable in the Senate.
But that's alright. The Senate is going to be the Senate. Plus, there are talented young conservatives with strong legal backgrounds there, so hope springs that one can step into Jeff's big shoes.
By contrast, the Justice Department, the institution in which I proudly spent most of my professional life as a lawyer, is in crisis. For eight years, we have had not the rule of law but a Ruler of Law - the imperial president, Barack Obama, aided and abetted by his hyper-political courtiers Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, derelict in the fundamental duty of his office to execute the laws faithfully.
The Obama Justice Department has been the most politicized in the nation's history. It has weaponized the law against the president's political adversaries and scapegoats, while insulating the president's allies against investigation and prosecution. It has made progressive political activism the touchstone of Justice Department hiring, stacking various departmental sections with social-justice warriors who see the law as their arsenal to achieve fundamental societal transformation.
It has exploited the legal process as an extortionate tool to shakedown deep-pocketed institutions for the purpose of funding progressive rabble-rousers. It has used law-enforcement to craft political narratives that, for example, propped up Obama's "blame the video" fraud after the Benghazi massacre; framed the nation's financial institutions for the mortgage meltdown, to the exclusion of reckless government policies; and undermined Second Amendment rights while getting federal agents killed (see the "Fast and Furious" debacle, over which Holder was held in contempt of Congress). It has injected racial discrimination into the enforcement of civil-rights laws in blatant violation of the equal-protection principles those laws are supposed to assure. It has exhibited a contempt for Congress and a propensity to obstruct legislative oversight that would have made the Nixon administration blush.
It has repeatedly engaged in appalling prosecutorial misconduct and then lied to federal judges to cover it up. It has not only refused to enforce the immigration laws and sued to prevent sovereign states from enforcing them, but has also endorsed the president's claimed power to ignore congressional statutes. It is abetting a war on the nation's police departments, seeking to nationalize them under the guise of baseless and ruinously divisive smears that cops are hunting down African-American men, and that the justice system is rigged against black people.
Senator Sessions, an accomplished lawyer and a good and decent man, is the right remedy for the Justice Department's extreme ailments.
As a highly experienced former federal prosecutor and United States attorney for the Southern District of Alabama, he has great respect for the Justice Department's traditions and its mission of vigorous, apolitical law-enforcement - amply demonstrated by his prosecutions of civil-rights violations that helped break segregation in Alabama's public-school system.
UPDATE: Trump Says He Won't Take Clinton Investigations Off the Table | Fox News Insider
UPDATE, 2:00pm ET: In a meeting with New York Times reporters, President-elect Donald Trump said he would not take the investigations of the Clintons off the table.
Two reporters tweeted from inside the meeting, as Trump also expressed the view that Clinton "suffered greatly" and that it would be "very, very divisive for the country" to prosecute the Clintons.
Maggie Haberman on Twitter: "Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for Clintons but adds he doesn't want to "hurt the Clintons."
Posted on 11/25/16 at 8:48 am to cajunangelle
Supporting civil forfeiture really shows where his beliefs lie regarding the law.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 8:52 am to buckeye_vol
Then change the law. I don't want law enforcement to be selective. Get rid of laws if that's we are asking them to do.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 8:54 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
Supporting civil forfeiture really shows where his beliefs lie regarding the law.
This is just divide and conquer tactics. This talking point is only done by people who are not on our team.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 8:56 am to C
quote:
Then change the law.
thinking the same thing, their opinions shouldn't matter one way or the other so long as they enforce the laws on the books. If they are outdated or unfair, then congress needs to change them(not judges).
Posted on 11/25/16 at 9:05 am to C
quote:That's the hypocrisy: it's not something that is required by law.
Then change the law.
Law and order can be just as much of a tool of authoritarians as it is for protection.
I'm afraid Sessions is a person that sees law and order as a means.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 9:06 am to zatetic
quote:Telling
This talking point is only done by people who are not on our team.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 9:07 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
I'm afraid Sessions is a person that sees law and order as a means.
you have an example?
how about if you were AG, you would rule completely unbiased?
Posted on 11/25/16 at 9:08 am to cajunangelle
Rule of law?
So I guess that means getting the Feds to raid all those pot shops in Colorado?
So I guess that means getting the Feds to raid all those pot shops in Colorado?
Posted on 11/25/16 at 9:34 am to KeyserSoze999
quote:See above.
you have an example?
quote:I don't know but I'm irrelevant to the Sessions pick.
how about if you were AG, you would rule completely unbiased?
Posted on 11/25/16 at 9:35 am to buckeye_vol
Jeff Sessions also loves the Patriot Act
Posted on 11/25/16 at 10:55 am to deathvalleyjunkie
Of course there will be things about him you don't like. Overall he should be much better than the shite we have had for 8 years
Posted on 11/25/16 at 11:51 am to MsState of mind
quote:
Of course there will be things about him you don't like. Overall he should be much better than the shite we have had for 8 years
I lived in Alabama.
No, he won't.
Not that "better than the last guy" should be the only determination in someone getting a job.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 1:35 pm to skrayper
Can you elaborate?
Specifically why he wouldn't be better than Loretta Lynch?
Thank you
Specifically why he wouldn't be better than Loretta Lynch?
Thank you
Posted on 11/25/16 at 2:02 pm to deathvalleyjunkie
quote:
Jeff Sessions also loves the Patriot Act
link?
Posted on 11/25/16 at 2:03 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Specifically why he wouldn't be better than Loretta Lynch or Holder?
Fify.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 2:07 pm to cajunangelle
I'm from Alabama, Jeff Sessions is a complete moron.
Posted on 11/25/16 at 2:08 pm to C
quote:
Then change the law. I don't want law enforcement to be selective. Get rid of laws if that's we are asking them to do.
Civil asset forfeiture is selective by the nature of the law. It's also already illegal by the nature of the constitution.
Jeff Sessions is a cuck who hates the constitution and freedom. He loves the state though. And he loves th thugs who fund thier operations with stolen money confiscated without due process.
If you are part if the criminal justice system, and you support CAF in its current form, then you are worse than these criminals. No exceptions.
This post was edited on 11/25/16 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 11/25/16 at 2:14 pm to skrayper
quote:
I lived in Alabama. No, he won't.
What did you find objectionable, and when did you live there?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News