- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Intel Committee 'satisfied' with info DOJ gave in wiretapping probe
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:59 pm
LINK
No word on what's in it or if there will be more
quote:
“The Committee is satisfied that the Department of Justice has fully complied with our request for information from our March 8 letter on possible surveillance related to Donald Trump or his associates," Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) said in a statement.
No word on what's in it or if there will be more
7
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:02 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
No word on what's in it or if there will be more
Dude, it's already being reported that it shows no evidence of Trump's claims. In other words, it's over. Trump and his staff could not back it up. Surprise, surprise.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:03 pm to Jjdoc
No shocker since the Obama administration sought the legal means to spy on the Trump campaign 3 times last year.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:05 pm to LSUTANGERINE
no it's not. This is what is being reported:
Thats prior to reading
Thats prior to reading.
This statement is after
quote:
SCHIFF tells me DOJ letter won't prove Trump was wiretapped
Thats prior to reading
quote:
I asked Nunes as he was heading into read DOJ letter if he thought it would back up Trump's wiretapping claim. He said: "I don't think so."
Thats prior to reading.
This statement is after
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:05 pm to Jjdoc
Proof of the tapping or not, as long as the DOJ did their due diligence, I would imagine the committee should be satisfied. They didn't make the claim, so if they couldn't find proof, they can't be held accountable if it doesn't exist.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:06 pm to Jjdoc
And they did not say they were satisfied with the info. They said they were satisfied that the DOJ complied.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:07 pm to Jjdoc
Why are Democrats and CNN so quick to dismiss the wiretapping problem?
The public needs to know if one administration was spying on the other. Spreading fantasies about Russian hacking, Pissgate, or gay concentration camps is just deflection from the massive amount of wrong doing that took place under the Obama DOJ.
The public needs to know if one administration was spying on the other. Spreading fantasies about Russian hacking, Pissgate, or gay concentration camps is just deflection from the massive amount of wrong doing that took place under the Obama DOJ.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:10 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
already being reported
By Toddy, who cited CNN.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:11 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
No word on what's in it or if there will be more
It's already been reported tonight that the DOJ report does not correct the wiretapping lie.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:11 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Dude, it's already being reported that it shows no evidence of Trump's claims
Is this like the "reported" apology from this morning?
Still waiting on cnn's retraction.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:12 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Still waiting on cnn's retraction.
You want a retraction from the Democratic party's propaganda network?
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:16 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
, as long as the DOJ did their due diligence
We likely won't get details since it's sensitive material.....but they likely turned over the documentation on the multiple warrants sought by the Obama administration to wiretap Trump last year right?
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:19 pm to member12
quote:I would think so. My guess is that is the primary evidence, but who knows.
but they likely turned over the documentation on the multiple warrants sought by the Obama administration to wiretap Trump last year right?
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:19 pm to Toddy
Where is the evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians?
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:19 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Is this like the "reported" apology from this morning?
What happened this morning?
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:20 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
I would think so. My guess is that is the primary evidence, but who knows
The warrants alone are a big deal. They are proof that legal surveillance on a rival political campaign was sought.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:22 pm to Toddy
quote:
It's already been reported tonight that the DOJ report does not correct the wiretapping lie.
already responded to that claim
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:22 pm to member12
quote:Do we know the exact details of them, or more specifically, what details do we know (for sure)?
The warrants alone are a big deal. They are proof that legal surveillance on a rival political campaign was sought.
But I do have a problem with the use of proof by the committee. If it didn't occur, then they can't provide proof. And even when something does exist, there is often not "proof" just evidence.
Maybe it's my bias from a scientific perspective, but "proof" is a word that is too often overused and misused to describe science.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:24 pm to member12
And CNN got it straight from Donna Brazille!!!
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:25 pm to member12
quote:
The warrants alone are a big deal. They are proof that legal surveillance on a rival political campaign was sought.
This man gets it. Anything that shows any agency directly or in directly targeted Trump or any team members is proof.
Legally or not.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News