- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In game thread: Supreme Court Orders and Opinions
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:37 am
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:37 am
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:40 am to anc
No action on Travel Ban this morning. Could be this afternoon or tomorrow.
The justices added two new cases to their docket for next fall -- which means they will hear oral arguments and decide on the merits. The big addition today is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. This is a challenge by a Colorado man who owns a bakery and regards himself as a "cake artist." He objects to having to create cakes for same-sex wedding ceremonies, on the ground that it would violate his religious beliefs.
The justices added two new cases to their docket for next fall -- which means they will hear oral arguments and decide on the merits. The big addition today is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. This is a challenge by a Colorado man who owns a bakery and regards himself as a "cake artist." He objects to having to create cakes for same-sex wedding ceremonies, on the ground that it would violate his religious beliefs.
This post was edited on 6/26/17 at 8:41 am
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:41 am to anc
quote:
a few seconds ago
Okay, so no action on the travel ban so far. The justices added two new cases to their docket for next fall -- which means they will hear oral arguments and decide on the merits. The big addition today is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. This is a challenge by a Colorado man who owns a bakery and regards himself as a "cake artist." He objects to having to create cakes for same-sex wedding ceremonies, on the ground that it would violate his religious beliefs.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:42 am to anc
Travel Ban restored.
Kennedy retires.
Ginsburg goes to the geriatric ward.
#winning
Kennedy retires.
Ginsburg goes to the geriatric ward.
#winning
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:42 am to cajunangelle
This will be the first "Bake a cake for a gay wedding" case to go before the Supreme Court.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:44 am to anc
quote:
5 minutes ago
The justices did NOT act on the travel ban this morning. We don't know whether there will be anything later on. There is another conference today, so they could act on it tomorrow. And it is possible that the justices could act on the stay -- that is, the government's request to reinstate the ban -- later on today. But it is not likely that the justices will act on the government's petition to review the lower court's rulings putting the travel ban on hold.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:49 am to anc
quote:
5 minutes ago
Do we know if Justice Kennedy hired clerks for next year?
Amy Howe
He has indeed. And one for the following term.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:03 am to anc
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:13 am to cajunangelle
They overturned the Church Playground decision in Missou
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:14 am to anc
cross your fingers hurry!!!
quote:
a few seconds ago
Note that, so far, we only have April sitting cases
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:16 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
They overturned the Church Playground decision in Missou
in favor of the church. This is a good win for common sense.
Church was denied the opportunity to apply for a state grant for its daycare playground. Interestingly, the state of Missouri has reversed it since.
The fact that four justices were against this is scary to me. This was about a damn playground.
This post was edited on 6/26/17 at 9:23 am
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:18 am to cajunangelle
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:20 am to anc
quote:
This is a challenge by a Colorado man who owns a bakery and regards himself as a "cake artist." He objects to having to create cakes for same-sex wedding ceremonies, on the ground that it would violate his religious beliefs.
It's fricking insane that the highest court in this country is hearing a case over whether a state can compel a man to create a cake when he doesn't want to.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:21 am to Damone
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:22 am to anc
quote:
in favor of the church. This is a good win for common sense.
They added a footnote though, that the ruling only applies to playground resurfacing.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:24 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
They added a footnote though, that the ruling only applies to playground resurfacing.
Thats fine. No one in their right mind wants a state to fund a church. But this was a grant program for playgrounds. The church operated a licensed daycare in good standing. The only reason they were denied the grant is because they were attached to a church.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:24 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
a minute ago
To confirm, there won't be any ruling on travel ban in this session?
ShareDiscussions1Likes0
JLawStLouis
Edith Roberts
The cases weren't included in this morning's orders, so no. The justices might rule on it separately later today or they might include it in an orders list tomorrow mornin
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:25 am to cajunangelle
Travel ban:
"We grant the petitions for certiorari and grant the stay applications in part."
"We grant the petitions for certiorari and grant the stay applications in part."
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:27 am to anc
quote:
2 minutes ago
We have action on the travel ban. "We grant the petitions for certiorari and grant the stay applications in part."
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News