Started By
Message

re: HuffPo: Shooting In Self-Defense Is Illegal Because It Denies Criminals A Fair Trial

Posted on 5/1/17 at 8:48 am to
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 8:48 am to
“Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay-and claims a halo for his dishonesty.”




- Robert Heinlein
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 8:49 am
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 8:49 am to
Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 9:07 am to




The "I'm published" line just doesn't mean what it used to.
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
12932 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 9:37 am to
These people cannot truly be serious.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22236 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 9:40 am to
quote:

The article is a year old. Why the outrage now?



No statute of limitations on mocking the stupid. (Trust me, I've been on both sides of this.)
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Liberalism really is a f*cking mental disease. You have to be one seriously f*cked-in-the-head scumbag to not laugh at these morons.


Liberalism certainly is a brain disorder. I mean we're talking about people who among other things use threats of violence to shut down free speech while screaming that other people are fascists.

It's time to start committing these people to mental institutions.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112438 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 9:57 am to
I'm surprised that the Dems haven't attempted to draw up OSHA regulations. Criminality is an occupation. And it's inherently dangerous. There needs to be govt guidelines to insure the safety of criminals.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43319 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 10:06 am to
This kid is a great example that credentials do not equal education. Or even basic grammar competency.



Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7771 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 10:38 am to
The author is fricking stupid and, imo, not representative of anyone but himself. But carry on tards.
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 10:39 am
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

The author is fricking stupid and, imo, not representative of anyone but himself. But carry on tards.


You don't think a large number of liberals agree with him?

And more importantly, rather than the individual policy opinions this is just another example of how liberals are divorced from reality.

It's insane.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 10:47 am to
I wish I could post crime scene photos to illustrate the stupidity of this.

anyone ever see a picture of Nicole brown simpson's body?

that was so nice of her to not have a gun so that oj could have his day in court.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 10:50 am to
I really hope that there aren't people who think like the author dos. I mean surely he really does understand that the 4th Amendment guarantees you get a trial if the GOVERNMENT charges you with a crime. It doesn't guarantee that you will be allowed to commit the crime in the first place.
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7771 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 10:57 am to
Having known plenty of liberals that choose not to own guns themselves I can honestly say this is the first time Ive seen someone make the absolutely fricking retarded assertion that people do not have a right to self defense.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83929 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights. In addition, one’s mental capacity is a major factor in deciding whether a man or woman has the right to have a firearm. There are two reasons for ensuring mental capacity. First, one of the Five Aims is to ensure domestic tranquility and there can be no tranquility if one does not have the capacity. Second, if one’s brain is distorting his or her reality, they do not have the proper reasoning and deduction skills to use a firearm.


The article completely changes in one paragraph. It gives a conclusion without support and then moves on to a topic that has little to do with the headline of their own article.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 4:03 pm to
There is a difference between some states retardedly low level of proof required to satisfy stand your ground laws.. and actual self defense.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram