- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would the US be different if women were never allowed to vote?
Posted on 4/13/24 at 9:55 am to KwoodTiger
Posted on 4/13/24 at 9:55 am to KwoodTiger
I flat out told women family members at a gathering, including the wife and daughter, that women shouldn't be allowed to vote. I got a little push back from some of them because they let me know they voted Trump. So I told them ok, I'll give y'all a 1/4 vote
3
Posted on 4/13/24 at 9:56 am to KwoodTiger
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:04 am to 4x4tiger
quote:
So I told them ok, I'll give y'all a 1/4 vote
Gotta be careful with that. You give them an inch they’ll take a mile. Women are also deceitful so they could have been lying about who they voted for.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:06 am to KwoodTiger
If women would stop being whores then abortion wouldn’t turn into the main issue destroying this country.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:08 am to KwoodTiger
quote:then trump wouldn’t have had my vote in ‘16 or ‘20
How would the US be different if women were never allowed to vote?
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:11 am to GreenRockTiger
How you doing, toots.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:12 am to mahdragonz
quote:
Because I can't think of one objective or logical measure where it isn't.
That's not surprising.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:12 am to 4x4tiger
quote:
, that women shouldn't be allowed to vote
Women would be fine if dudes would quit spoiling them.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:14 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
As far as voting, I think society would mostly be better off, with a few exceptions. Cubbies can hate that all she wants. I think it's true. I don't think women are wired to generally make the best decisions in that context..
For example. I don't like Donald Trump. But I know the life of my family and millions of families like ours will be better if he is elected rather than a repeat of Joe Biden.
My wife doesn't like Donald Trump. Only there's a difference. Two differences, really. She doesn't just not like like him, she hates him. Gets angry talking about him. Can't keep from getting emotional about him.
I've never met the guy. I'll never have him over to my house. To me it's nothing personal. To her it is. I don't get emotional over the guy. She does.
That's difference number one.
Difference number two—closely related to difference number one—is that it's not difficult at all for me to walk into a booth and pull a lever for someone who is going to have a positive impact on me and people like me even if I don't like him. So what if I don't like him personally? That's got nothing to do with it.
My wife can't separate the two. And her feelings are so important to her that she would rather satisfy the urge to spite the guy by voting for the opposition than she would preserve the best interests of her family.
A lot of undeniable truth here
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:14 am to wackatimesthree
quote:This is the problem with most women.
My wife can't separate the two. And her feelings are so important to her that she would rather satisfy the urge to spite the guy by voting for the opposition than she would preserve the best interests of her family.
You’re not marrying him you ignorant bitches, you’re hiring him to do a job!
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:18 am to FredBear
quote:
Two differences, really. She doesn't just not like like him, she hates him. Gets angry talking about him. Can't keep from getting emotional about him.
This is why I was always attracted to females who were tomboyish.
Theyre a different breed.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:18 am to RougeDawg
quote:
Nixon would have beat JFK and never gave LBJ a chance to frick up the country. First televised debate saw a young good looking guy vs. a old sweaty guy; that is all women needed to decide their vote.
Yeah, and Cliff Robertson made that movie PT 109 glorifying JFK. I thought I'd never forgive Cliff for that. But then he played SHAME in Batman and he was funny as hell.
Girlfriend: 'Oh Shame, now we have the money to buy that ranch. I can see us now. Just you, me and my mom sitting on the front porch. Can you see it, Shame?'
Shame: 'I can see two-thirds of it.'
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:19 am to GoblinGuide
quote:What, speaking the truth and stating the obvious?
This entire thread is exhibit A in why conservatives get their asses kicked in regards to attracting women to the party.
This post was edited on 4/13/24 at 10:53 am
Posted on 4/13/24 at 10:26 am to KwoodTiger
Definitely less Democrat political domination so most of this social engineering and environmental insanity would not exist.
Russia would have never invaded Ukraine.
China would have never developed a deadly Corona virus and released it against the world.
Iran would be in check and not a nuclear threat.
Our economy would be much more stable with lower inflation and federal debt.
Our border would be much more secure and sanctuary cities would not exist in violation of federal immigration laws.
Crime in general would be greatly reduced due to reduced influx of criminal elements across our borders and these ridiculous laws that reduce criminal penalties which embolden criminals would not exist.
None of this fake global warming data would be supported as credible.
This bullshite gender identity phenomenon would not exist.
And don't get me wrong: women have contributed to society in many positions ways but their support of the Democrat Party has translated into a net negative overall.
Russia would have never invaded Ukraine.
China would have never developed a deadly Corona virus and released it against the world.
Iran would be in check and not a nuclear threat.
Our economy would be much more stable with lower inflation and federal debt.
Our border would be much more secure and sanctuary cities would not exist in violation of federal immigration laws.
Crime in general would be greatly reduced due to reduced influx of criminal elements across our borders and these ridiculous laws that reduce criminal penalties which embolden criminals would not exist.
None of this fake global warming data would be supported as credible.
This bullshite gender identity phenomenon would not exist.
And don't get me wrong: women have contributed to society in many positions ways but their support of the Democrat Party has translated into a net negative overall.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 11:21 am to 4x4tiger
You’re such a tough guy!!
Posted on 4/13/24 at 11:22 am to RogerTheShrubber
Incels starting to show their face in this thread
Posted on 4/13/24 at 11:24 am to CapperVin
You are filth. We are not mates any longer, mate.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 11:32 am to KwoodTiger
If you own something of value you should be able to vote. Land or business. Home is good , RV maybe . Breast implants , automatically disqualified.
Posted on 4/13/24 at 11:44 am to 4cubbies
That makes sense because you are legitimately stupid but just for giggles let’s take a walk down memory lane and look at some of the geniuses in the last 100 years who have been elected and compare them to leaders during the first 120 years or so of the Republic since you are in fact very stupid: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, Andrew Jackson, James Monroe, Abraham Lincoln, Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson. Now, let’s compare that list to this list absolute statesmen: Warren G. Harding, Herbert Hoover, Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Bush 1, Bill Clinton, Bush 2, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden. The three exceptions to the rule during the female voting era are FDR, Eisenhower, and Reagan. Even the abject “failures” during the first 120 years of the Republic were considered as much because they died early in office or were tied to the Civil War but compared to the likes of Johnson, Kennedy, Carter, the Bush’s, Obama, Clinton, Trump, or Biden were Rhodes Scholars. Outside of the Civil War and the Vietnam Era nothing has caused more damage to this nation politically than women voting. The facts over the last 100 years politically speak for themselves. Look at many of the representatives, mayors, and governors that have been elected in that time span or judges appointed. It is an absolute disgrace
Posted on 4/13/24 at 11:48 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I’m way more interested in how different it would be if men were never allowed to vote.
Just acknowledge men give you the freedoms you have. Men also build and maintain everything in society. We do all the jobs women won’t and aren’t capable of doing, which is a lot. Don’t act like we aren’t needed, because we keep the world running including keep you safe while you sleep like a baby.
This post was edited on 4/13/24 at 11:55 am
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News