Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

How Merrivk Garland could still end up a SCOTUS justice

Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:35 am
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15047 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:35 am
Method One -

VP Biden, before swearing in the new Congress of senators, recognizes Durbin who calls for a vote on Garland when there are only 66 senators seated, the majority of which are Ds. They vote and Garland is confirmed, then the new class of senators is sworn in.

Method Two -

LINK

Come January, President Barack Obama will be consigned to the sidelines as Donald Trump occupies the Oval Office and begins the work of dismantling his legacy. But there is one action that Obama could take on January 3, 2017 that could hold off some of the worst potential abuses of a Trump administration for up to a year. Obama can appoint his nominee Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court on that date, in between the two sessions of Congress.

Here’s how it would work. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution states, “The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate.” This has been used for Supreme Court vacancies before—William Brennan began his Court tenure with a recess appointment in 1956. Any appointments made in this fashion expire at the end of the next Senate session. So a Garland appointment on January 3 would last until December 2017, the end of the first session of the 115th Congress.

Why January 3? Because the president’s recess appointment powers were significantly constrained by a 2014 Supreme Court ruling. In a 9-0 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, the Court said the president cannot appoint individuals to fill vacancies if the Senate holds “pro forma” sessions every three days. Though these sessions, common since 2011, merely gavel in and gavel out the Senate chamber, they have the practical effect of keeping the Senate active, therefore blocking the recess appointment power.

But even the Court’s most conservative members acknowledged that a president can make recess appointments during “inter-session” recesses—such as the break between the first and second year of a Congress, or the break between outgoing or incoming Congresses. There simply has to be an end point there, as a metaphysical matter. Theodore Roosevelt once used a short inter-session recess to make hundreds of appointments.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72118 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:38 am to
Yes, he has as good of a chance as you leftists have with the EC not voting for Trump. That went over well.

Why do y'all continue to delude yourselves? It isn't healthy.

Stop acting like children and move on.
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 11:39 am
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12661 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:38 am to
So he would be on the bench for 1 year as a recess appointment not really worth it for theshitstorm it would cause and the fact trump would be running the justice department to target ex officials
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99042 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:41 am to
Typical liberal, figuring out how to game the system to do something most of the country is against just so you can claim even the tiniest little victory in your quest to destroy America. Pathetic.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15047 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:45 am to
I'm not saying I want it done, I'm throwing it out as a possibility.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45766 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:45 am to
Even if Obama was foolish enough to make a recess appointment in this tiny sliver of time, if both houses of Congress agree, the session can be ended on an agreed upon date, then started again on an agreed upon date. So, Mr. Garland may be there for only a week or so at the most, and then when the session ended, he'd be out.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15047 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:47 am to
It is my understanding he would be there a year?
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:59 am to
As happy as I am that Trump won, Obama should have been given this appointment as the vacancy happened on his term. I'm all for fair play and know I'll get downvoted to oblivion and back for this but my mother taught me right.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45766 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 11:59 am to
quote:

It is my understanding he would be there a year?
It is my understanding that Congress has authority (as long as both the Senate and the House agree on a majority vote, which Republicans control) to call an end to a session and to authorize a new session. The question is, do they have the nuts to do that? There would be a lot of flak over the appointment, and then there would be a lot of flak about the political machinations to force a close to Congress. Either way, going to be a lot of crap if Obama tries this punk crap.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:08 pm to
Why do liberals always want to break the rules to get their way?
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
17717 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

As happy as I am that Trump won, Obama should have been given this appointment as the vacancy happened on his term. I'm all for fair play and know I'll get downvoted to oblivion and back for this but my mother taught me right.



But she apparently didn't teach you about communists, they don't give a shite about "fair play", the end justifies the means. One thing the GOP did well was not to confirm another justice brought up by this fraud president.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:25 pm to
Well you are wrong
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 12:39 pm to
A gentleman writing at The Federalist weeks ago debunked this liberal fantasy. Read the takedown here:

No, Senate Democrats Can’t Use The ‘Nuclear Option’ To Confirm Merrick Garland

Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 12/20/16 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Well you are wrong


It's an opinion, it can't be wrong. This shite will bite us in the arse one day. I don't know when but it will.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram