Started By
Message
locked post

How does the U.S. control the value of dollar by soaking up drug trade money?

Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:14 am
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:14 am
Someone recently posted this.

It's intriguing to think about, but I don't fully understand it.

Can someone (perhaps the original author) explain it in a bit more detail. I think I get it, but I just need a few more details.

This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 10:16 am
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:17 am to
I quoted it from that weird-arse LARP thread compilation from 4chan.

I haven't tried to break it down (or read from someone who has), but it seems plausible on the surface.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:20 am to
quote:

I haven't tried to break it down (or read from someone who has), but it seems plausible on the surface.



I get that it's a great way to soak up excess U.S. dollars...but how does that translate to controlling the value of the dollar?

That's the missing link which is going over my head.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:21 am to
quote:

I get that it's a great way to soak up excess U.S. dollars...but how does that translate to controlling the value of the dollar?



By controlling M1 supply. Eliminating these dollars from circulation could prevent excessive inflation.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:


I get that it's a great way to soak up excess U.S. dollars...but how does that translate to controlling the value of the dollar?

That's the missing link which is going over my head.


I have never heard this, but if they are removing money from circulation they might be implying that this makes money more scarce and therefore relatively more valuable.

Of course that explanation ignores the massive amount of credit extended during the last 8 years.
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

value of the dollar


I didn't see what you are talking about so I don't know if value means literally what the dollar is worth or more so that the dollar is very useful.

Drugs being traded in dollars means the dollar will be internationally used and will keep dollars moving. There was worry for a while that Euros with their 500 euro bills would displace the dollar since you could carry more currency in lesser space.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

By controlling M1 supply. Eliminating these dollars from circulation could prevent excessive inflation.



so are they implying that the failed War on Drugs actually has another purpose altogether, and that purpose is to soak up U.S. dollars to control the value of the dollar?

If so, does that perhaps partly explain why the Treasury can print money with little blowback? Just an offset of what we soak up from the drug trade?
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 10:35 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53432 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:27 am to
I have seen a lot of material on how drug money props up the markets. But, as to the value of the dollar, read up on petrodollar recycling.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:28 am to
quote:

If so, does that perhaps explain why the FED can print money with little blowback? Just an offset of what we soak up from the drug trade?



I doubt it's a total offset.

I also imagine that the feds running big-time drug shipments is a way for 'non-budgetary' enticement of foreign officials.
Posted by Big Chipper
Charlotte, NC
Member since Sep 2008
2777 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:33 am to
quote:

If so, does that perhaps partly explain why the FED can print money with little blowback?
The Fed doesn't print currency. The Bureau of Engraving and Printing does. They're a part of the Treasury, not the Fed.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:33 am to
I've never really looked at the War on Drugs from this point of view, which is really fascinating.

I've always wondered why our government has been 100 percent committed to the War on Drugs even though experts have long claimed the War on Drugs has been a total failure.

I've always wondered what secret motives the government had to continue the War on Drugs. I assumed the motives were far beyond my understanding: Perhaps foreign policy related, etc. Unless you were directly involved it would be nearly impossible to understand it. And I assume the government believes there's many different angles of benefit to continuing the WoD.

But I never considered this angle.

Very fascinating!
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 10:36 am
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:34 am to
quote:

The Fed doesn't print currency. The Bureau of Engraving and Printing does. They're a part of the Treasury, not the Fed.



Correct. My mistake. I'll edit.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Eliminating these dollars from circulation
Buying something, including drugs, does not remove dollars from circulation.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Buying something, including drugs, does not remove dollars from circulation.



Selling drugs and sitting on the cash effectively does, though.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:42 am to
quote:

By controlling M1 supply.
quote:

Selling drugs and sitting on the cash effectively does, though.
Those dollars are still included in the M1 calculation, contrary to your quote above.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Those dollars are still included in the M1 calculation, contrary to your quote above.



Under what model are inert monies counted? Serious question, I'm not trying to debate you on your expertise.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:48 am to
What about busting drug lords and confiscating billions in U.S. dollars?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:49 am to
quote:

What about busting drug lords and confiscating billions in U.S. dollars?



Doesn't seem to happen very often.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:54 am to
quote:

inert monies
What is that?
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 10:55 am to
I would think the problem would be scale, and well control of the actors. its not like the gov't can adjust rates and get the cartels to sit on $$ or spend them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram