- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How does DJT end up with such a disparate group of attorneys?
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:25 pm
First, I would point out he has some great attorneys such as D. John Sauer repping him but how did a billionaire with as many lawsuits as he has been involved in end up with someone like Alina Habba who:
1. often answers the court with "sure"
2. has no clue how to enter a deposition into evidence and subsequently impeach the witness using that deposition
3. objects while sitting on her arse
4. does not grasp the concept of "for the truth of the matter asserted" in relation to a hearsay objection
These are all things you learn in the first month of a trial advocacy class or 3 or 4 episodes of Law and Order.
Does anyone have any novel insight besides the frick with OMB type of answers? I am honestly baffled by this. Her in-court performance in the Carroll case would get most 1 year associates summarily fired from a good firm.
1. often answers the court with "sure"
2. has no clue how to enter a deposition into evidence and subsequently impeach the witness using that deposition
3. objects while sitting on her arse
4. does not grasp the concept of "for the truth of the matter asserted" in relation to a hearsay objection
These are all things you learn in the first month of a trial advocacy class or 3 or 4 episodes of Law and Order.
Does anyone have any novel insight besides the frick with OMB type of answers? I am honestly baffled by this. Her in-court performance in the Carroll case would get most 1 year associates summarily fired from a good firm.
15
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:27 pm to Obtuse1
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/23/24 at 11:25 am
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:30 pm to Obtuse1
Not guilty
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:30 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
How does DJT end up with such a disparate group of attorneys?
Lawfare. Can you stand vs the government and not lose your livelihood?
Are you willing to sacrifice your life and family? They will come after you, even for BS charges.
This needs to end.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:31 pm to Obtuse1
I don't think it's limited to attorneys nor limited to the more political era of his life.
It seems like his hired professionals have always fallen in a broad range between "well-respected" and "under indictment" and who can really say why. I think Trump, being a colorful character, is probably drawn to people of the same sort. I think he probably values personal allegiance above all else and isn't going to get that with Cravath, etc.
More recently, it's probably a completely different landscape.
It seems like his hired professionals have always fallen in a broad range between "well-respected" and "under indictment" and who can really say why. I think Trump, being a colorful character, is probably drawn to people of the same sort. I think he probably values personal allegiance above all else and isn't going to get that with Cravath, etc.
More recently, it's probably a completely different landscape.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:33 pm to Obtuse1
Would someone from Perkins Coie provide him a better defense?
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:33 pm to Obtuse1
are you familiar with 65 project? google it.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:35 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
How does DJT end up with such a disparate group of attorneys?
I have no idea.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:38 pm to Obtuse1
Yeah bro but she's a smokeshow you cuck
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:42 pm to Lou Pai
HABBA HABBA HABBA !!!
That’s why!
Playas gon’ play!
That’s why!
Playas gon’ play!
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:45 pm to Pettifogger
No one in his life was ever scrutinized legally like this until he decided to run for president as a republican and beat Hillary "HerTurn" Clinton
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:50 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
No one in his life was ever scrutinized legally like this until he decided to run for president as a republican and beat Hillary "HerTurn" Clinton
There is a good argument for that but it doesn't explain his inner circle guys like Cohen, etc. which predate it.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 9:56 pm to SDVTiger
She’s a 10 in my book, whatever she says, I’d grant her immunity
Posted on 1/17/24 at 10:03 pm to Pettifogger
Cohen had no real legal issues until Trump became POTUS. Who are you talking about?
Posted on 1/17/24 at 10:05 pm to Obtuse1
How? They started targeting anyone that would help him. That’s how
Posted on 1/17/24 at 10:05 pm to Westbank111
she's actually a really good lawyer.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 10:09 pm to SDVTiger
Fully qualified.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 10:14 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
she's actually a really good lawyer.
She would be sanctioned for lack or decorum at 99.99% of the courts in the United States.
It makes lawyers look horrible.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 10:20 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
No one in his life was ever scrutinized legally like this until he decided to run for president as a republican and beat Hillary "HerTurn" Clinton
These hacks just aren’t as good as keeping it all quiet as Roy Cohn was.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 10:22 pm to Rebel
quote:
Would someone from Perkins Coie provide him a better defense?
It does appear that the answer is Yes.
And if they could not, they would daylight murder the main witness.
And somehow win and profit from the litigation of both cases.
This post was edited on 1/17/24 at 10:23 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News