- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
House Intelligence Chair: I want to know why the IC has changed their story
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:27 pm
LINK /
quote:
Members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, meanwhile, have been trekking to CIA headquarters to review raw intelligence.
Nunes said he wants to know why top intelligence officials changed their assessment of Russia's influence between December and January.
"What we're trying to get to the bottom of, is how did the assessment on December 5 that they gave us, how did it radically change -- with the major change being that specifically that the Russians were trying to get Donald Trump elected, and that's what we're trying to get to the bottom of," Nunes told CNN Wednesday. "It's just a major shift we need to understand and we're the oversight body."
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:30 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
with the major change being that specifically that the Russians were trying to get Donald Trump elected, and that's what we're trying to get to the bottom of,
Still doesn't tell us what it was changed from. Was the old assessment the Russians were more involved then they walked it back?
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:32 pm to joshnorris14
IC to House Intelligence Chair: frick off.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:36 pm to joshnorris14
Should we take Nunes literally? Maybe he's just clownin around.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:37 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Should we take Nunes literally?
I do.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:46 pm to joshnorris14
Am I missing the quoted OP in the article or is it a wrong link?
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:48 pm to cajunangelle
It's the last three paragraphs
Posted on 3/8/17 at 6:52 pm to joshnorris14
okay thanks, my bad. I got out of the page too quickly because Graham in the video playing gives me the creeps I don't trust that man at all.
Look at the breaking news, Huntsman as Russian Ambassador.
Look at the breaking news, Huntsman as Russian Ambassador.
This post was edited on 3/8/17 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 3/8/17 at 7:15 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
"What we're trying to get to the bottom of, is how did the assessment on December 5 that they gave us, how did it radically change -- with the major change being that specifically that the Russians were trying to get Donald Trump elected,
Sounds like that after it came out that the Russian banks were just conducting regular, nightly transactions, the reason for the wiretaps cant be reasonably explained. Esp since the entire IC reported that NO AMERICAN was found colluding with Russians.
So since Dec 5th its been "We really weren't investigating Trump". Drastic change (and screams if getting caught with their hand in the cookie jar)
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News