Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Gen Mattis is getting props from left wing print

Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:29 pm
The MSM angle is that the Dems should oppose all Trump appointments and initiatives. But I've been seeing a different take in print copies of USA Today and NYT since his name came up.

The gist:

Trump is a retard and cannot be left in charge of our military because he will start a nuclear war every weekend.

Having a military guy like Mattis will prevent Trump from these mistakes... as opposed to a Def Sect. picked from Trump's buddies on Wall Street who want a war to prop up the MIC.

This might mean that the Dems go ahead and give Mattis the waiver without much argument.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:31 pm to
fighting Mattis seems very, very stupid. he's way too popular and way too qualified

there are plenty of appointments that they can fight (like Sessions, the Dep of Education lady, etc). this seems like they're trying to create a "talking point" to excuse why they won't oppose Mattis to give them cover in the media
Posted by THDAY
Member since Feb 2014
1123 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:35 pm to
I wouldn't want to be a Dem up for reelection with a vote against mattis on the resume.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:35 pm to
Mattis is the only one apportionment they could conceivably have any control over with the waiver.

The rest of the appointments only need 51 republican senators to pass and that's something democrats can't do shite about.

They're literally helpless thanks to that piece of shite Harry Reid being a piece of shite invoking the nuke option.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

there are plenty of appointments that they can fight (like Sessions, the Dep of Education lady, etc). this seems like they're trying to create a "talking point" to excuse why they won't oppose Mattis to give them cover in the media


I was just about to say this. This is just them clearing a path for a mostly seamless confirmation.
Posted by King Teal
The Last Banana Republic
Member since Sep 2016
988 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:56 pm to
Not that it matters necessarily, but I notice Mattis never married... Kind of strange don't you think?

Petraeus married and was slamming side pieces, and he is the ultimate military alpha male as well.

Thoughts?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Not that it matters necessarily, but I notice Mattis never married... Kind of strange don't you think?


Condi Rice never married. Maybe we can hook them up.
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3598 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 3:00 pm to
#BlackWifesMattis ?
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 3:01 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64325 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Thoughts?


You should ask him.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't want to be a Dem up for reelection with a vote against mattis on the resume.


Not so much. The idea of Mattis as SecDef scares the bejeezus out of much of our pusillanimous electorate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram