- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gab brings lawsuit against Google
Posted on 9/15/17 at 10:58 am
Posted on 9/15/17 at 10:58 am
LINK
Free speech social media site Gab AI, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Google for violations of the Clayton Act and Sherman Act. The lawsuit stems from Google removing Gab from its Google Play Android app store on spurious grounds of “hate speech” arising from posts by users.
Google did not accuse Gab of hate speech, but used third party content as a pretext to justify its own business ends. Gab, a startup, aims to bring “folks together of all races, religions, and creeds who share in the common ideals of Western values, individual liberty and the free exchange and flow of information.”
According to Gab’s attorney, Marc Randazza, Google’s conduct is a straightforward violation of the antitrust laws “Google Play and Android have monopoly power in the app store market, and Google’s apps YouTube and Google+ compete directly against Gab. Google’s intimate partnership with Twitter, which also competes against Gab, makes Google’s control of all Android apps available through the Play Store a serious restraint of trade issue.”....
Free speech social media site Gab AI, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Google for violations of the Clayton Act and Sherman Act. The lawsuit stems from Google removing Gab from its Google Play Android app store on spurious grounds of “hate speech” arising from posts by users.
Google did not accuse Gab of hate speech, but used third party content as a pretext to justify its own business ends. Gab, a startup, aims to bring “folks together of all races, religions, and creeds who share in the common ideals of Western values, individual liberty and the free exchange and flow of information.”
According to Gab’s attorney, Marc Randazza, Google’s conduct is a straightforward violation of the antitrust laws “Google Play and Android have monopoly power in the app store market, and Google’s apps YouTube and Google+ compete directly against Gab. Google’s intimate partnership with Twitter, which also competes against Gab, makes Google’s control of all Android apps available through the Play Store a serious restraint of trade issue.”....
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:01 am to notsince98
First of many I suspect. About to be open season on tech companies. Just the natural order of things. I think we are entering a Teddy Roosevelt trust busting period.
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:03 am to notsince98
can't wait o hear the "net neutrality" folks (esp in big tech) discuss this one
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
can't wait o hear the "net neutrality" folks (esp in big tech) discuss this one
No shite but most of them can't see the forest for the trees and don't understand the relationship.
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:06 am to notsince98
It would be sensible for apple to back Gab to compete against twitter/google
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:45 am to LosLobos111
quote:
It would be sensible for apple to back Gab to compete against twitter/google
Aw, that is so cute.
Posted on 9/15/17 at 11:50 am to blowmeauburn
quote:
First of many I suspect. About to be open season on tech companies. Just the natural order of things. I think we are entering a Teddy Roosevelt trust busting period.
I think that's a good thing.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News