Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

From Prescient 1998 Book "Achieving Our Country" - Predicted 2016 Election

Posted on 11/21/16 at 9:37 am
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 9:37 am
quote:

[M]embers of labor unions, and unorganized unskilled workers, will sooner or
later realize that their government is not even trying to prevent wages from
sinking or to prevent jobs from being exported. Around the same time, they
will realize that suburban white­collar workers — themselves desperately
afraid of being downsized — are not going to let themselves be taxed to
provide social benefits for anyone else.

At that point, something will crack. The nonsuburban electorate will decide
that the system has failed and start looking around for a strongman to vote
for — someone willing to assure them that, once he is elected, the smug
bureaucrats, tricky lawyers, overpaid bond salesmen, and postmodernist
professors will no longer be calling the shots. …

One thing that is very likely to happen is that the gains made in the past 40
years by black and brown Americans, and by homosexuals, will be wiped out.
Jocular contempt for women will come back into fashion. … All the resentment
which badly educated Americans feel about having their manners dictated to
them by college graduates will find an outlet.


From the article about the book:

quote:

“Nobody is setting up a program in unemployed studies, homeless studies, or
trailer­park studies,” he wrote, “because the unemployed, the homeless, and the
residents of trailer parks are not ‘other’ in the relevant sense.”
Does this overlooked category sound familiar?

quote:


“This world economy will soon be owned by a cosmopolitan upper class which
has no more sense of community with any workers anywhere than the great
American capitalists of the year 1900.”
Again: Ring any bells?
This group included intellectuals, by the way, who, he wrote, are “ourselves
quite well insulated, at least in the short run, from the effects of globalization.”


I wonder if El Trumpo read this book? Maybe books on tape?

LINK


This post was edited on 11/21/16 at 10:47 am
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:47 am to
Bump - seriously, this isn't interesting?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23141 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:55 am to
The book might be interesting, but that article is insufferable.

ETA:

I made it to Clinton and Obama rejected identity politics. The author is swimming in a deluge of liberal delusion.
This post was edited on 11/21/16 at 10:57 am
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:57 am to
quote:

but that article is insufferable.


The author of the article definitely goes off the rails, but the quotes from the book and the book author are pretty interesting and fairly accurate as to what moved a lot of those voters in the midwest-rust belt.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23141 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:57 am to
Agreed
Posted by Bunsbert Montcroff
Phoenix AZ / Boise ID
Member since Jan 2008
5493 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Bump - seriously, this isn't interesting?

very interesting article.

this was a common theme through a lot of rorty's later work (achieving our country and philosophy and social hope) - the left's abandonment of labor and labor coalitions for identity politics (the origins of which go all the way back to the failure of the 1968 revolutions). or, as one of my colleagues likes to say, the modern left is "too much foucault and not enough marx". (yes, i know "not enough marx" will leave your knickers in a twist - it's just a way of saying that economic concerns have been abandoned for cultural concerns among leftists).

incidentally, rorty was also heavily critical of leftists in the 90s that were blatantly anti-American. he hated what he called the "america sucks sweepstakes" in which leftists would compete to see who could bad-mouth america the most. he always talked about the need for the left to be more proud of america. constantly warned that it could "win" the culture wars and still "lose" elections and all the economic arguments.

if he were alive today i certainly don't think he'd support trump and his movement, but he certainly would have seen it coming and wouldn't have been surprised.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram