- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Federal prosecutor breaks down what happened with Hunter in court on 7/26/23
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:13 am
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:13 am
8
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:23 am to cajunangelle
That’s some pretty damn sound reasoning.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:26 am to John McClane
I have to give Draino credit. He did it a bit more succinctly.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:27 am to cajunangelle
From what I have seen, if we leave out some of the judgmental commentary, Scharff presents an entirely reasonable extrapolation of the facts.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 7:29 am
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:27 am to cajunangelle
Things continue to build up against the Biden's, maybe it will be enough to tip the scales of justice the correct direction. So much of this administration's corruption continues to be exposed and it screams to be dealt with.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:48 am to AggieHank86
Sounds like the judge was telling the lawyers that she was not going to be party to a bullshite plea deal that basically would have her on the record for absolving all potential future prosecution.
DoJ does not look good in this.
DoJ does not look good in this.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:49 am to cajunangelle
These are some corrupt and brazen SOBs.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 7:57 am to AggieHank86
You should probably go back and rethink this now that we have the actual plea bargain available to read. At least Scharff had the benefit of only going by what he was told. You posted this 9 hours after we had it available. What's your excuse?
Edit: Heck we have the transcript and the Judge herself own words on it now. AggieHank you really are amateur hour over here.
Edit: Heck we have the transcript and the Judge herself own words on it now. AggieHank you really are amateur hour over here.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 7:59 am
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:01 am to PhtevenWithaV
He has none. He has ego and arrogance.
Hank, "Oh Lovie Dear, please pass the Grey poupon...I am about to beat some rube a$$ on TD".
Hank, "Oh Lovie Dear, please pass the Grey poupon...I am about to beat some rube a$$ on TD".
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:03 am to PhtevenWithaV
He’s a pretend lawyer. Let him pretend.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:07 am to AggieHank86
quote:
From what I have seen, if we leave out some of the judgmental commentary, Scharff presents an entirely reasonable extrapolation of the facts.
I’m not a lawyer but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express before. I would agree that is nice summary and explanation.
quote:
AggieHank86
Agreed with but still voted down.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:20 am to cajunangelle
All my life I thought prosecution and defense were on opposite sides of the issues.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:21 am to cajunangelle
Outstanding!!
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:36 am to PhtevenWithaV
quote:I should “rethink” my agreement with Scharf’s assessment?
You should probably go back and rethink this now that we have the actual plea bargain available to read.
OK, I have given it more thought, and I still think he has presented a reasonable extrapolation from known facts.
Do you really not understand that I agree with you here? JFC.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 8:39 am
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:59 am to KiwiHead
quote:
DoJ does not look good in this.
We’ve been told no one is above the law.
DOJ continues to prove Dems are in fact above the law, while conservatives will be targeted for wiping their arse wrong.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:04 am to cajunangelle
I tried to find where I read but couldn't - one point was that this was orchestrated in order to keep the “ongoing investigation” open. Doing so keeps other scenarios of prosecuting other Bidens, off the table due to ongoing. I would guess at least until primaries or actual election.
Just throwing that out there for thought.
Just throwing that out there for thought.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:05 am to AggieHank86
Based on what I read, I'd refer some lawyers for a judicial misconduct review.
They tried to snoball a Judge, got caught, and left embarrassed.
They tried to snoball a Judge, got caught, and left embarrassed.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:06 am to AggieHank86
quote:
OK, I have given it more thought, and I still think he has presented a reasonable extrapolation from known facts.
We literally have the judges own words on it from court available by the time you made the original post and she directly contradicts Scharf's assessment. I mean I guess if you think Scharf knows what the judge was thinking better than the judge? As for me, I'll go with the judge's opinion.
quote:
Do you really not understand that I agree with you here? JFC.
I've made no claim other than we now know Scharf's assessment to be wrong and that he has the benefit of being able to say he didn't know the actual plea bargain nor what was actually said in court. Nor did he have the opportunity or ability to know.
You meanwhile had the opportunity to know but chose to remain ignorant.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 9:09 am
Posted on 7/27/23 at 10:26 am to KiwiHead
quote:If LouCreamFBIPai is lurking the FBI is superb.
DoJ does not look good in this.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 10:30 am to PhtevenWithaV
Exactly which of Scharf’s assessments do you contend the judge to have contradicted? Be specific with both the Scharf statement and the judicial contradiction. thx
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News