- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Experts: NO case against Trump
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:32 pm to Abadeebadaba
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:32 pm to Abadeebadaba
Can you really blame me for stirring the pot a little when everyone is so worked up today?
I absolutely respect due process and would be against impeachment if they didn't have real evidence of a crime.
I absolutely respect due process and would be against impeachment if they didn't have real evidence of a crime.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 6:34 pm
1
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:34 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
Can you really blame me for stirring the pot a little when everyone is so worked up today?
Yes, I can. It is against the rules to just flame people here. Now you admit it? But, I know you don't care about no damn rules anyways. So, carry on sir.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:36 pm to Abadeebadaba
I haven't been flaming people. I've been stirring the pot a little. I've been flamed a few times. Yesterday someone started making bonfire jokes. Not hard to let internet message board insults from anonymous people roll off though.
I consider a flame to be a personal attack. I dont do that unless someone tries to argue with ridiculous logic and fallacy. And even then I don't take it to "you should have been aborted" levels.
I consider a flame to be a personal attack. I dont do that unless someone tries to argue with ridiculous logic and fallacy. And even then I don't take it to "you should have been aborted" levels.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:37 pm to Navytiger74
You lose at everything. You lost at birth. You lost at only being employable by the State. You lost at being able to remain a non Alchoholic. You lost in the primary. You lost in the General election. You lose, lose, lose at all that you do. How do you handle all of the losing with such a good attitude? I mean that because it is quite impressive.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:39 pm to Dick Leverage
quote:Melt.
You lose at everything. You lost at birth. You lost at only being employable by the State. You lost at being able to remain a non Alchoholic. You lost in the primary. You lost in the General election. You lose, lose, lose at all that you do. How do you handle all of the losing with such a good attitude? I mean that because it is quite impressive.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:41 pm to Navytiger74
You get pwned and all you can respond with is "melt"? 
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:42 pm to Dick Leverage
Wow. I know someone that would be proud of this meltdown. I apparently can't even mention her name anymore.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:43 pm to The Dudes Rug
quote:Yeah an angry redneck throwing a tantrum and popping off on the internet doesn't really register as "pwned" with me.
You get pwned and all you can respond with is "melt"?
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:43 pm to Navytiger74
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:43 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
You lose at everything. You lost at birth. You lost at only being employable by the State. You lost at being able to remain a non Alchoholic. You lost in the primary. You lost in the General election. You lose, lose, lose at all that you do. How do you handle all of the losing with such a good attitude? I mean that because it is quite impressive.
Melt.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:53 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
It's called sarcasm
SDVTiger's vocabulary only has MELT and AMERICA frick YEAH in it.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:55 pm to Hawkeye95
Yeah. He also knows how to attempt to flame people and post gifs.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:55 pm to The First Cut
quote:
If you read the original piece, not Breitbart's misrepresentation of it, it says that we don't know how strong the case is until a special counsel completes an investigation.
And after the investigation is complete and no evidence is found, that doesn't mean there is no evidence so we must have have another investigation just to be safe.
Am I doing this right, sore loser lefties and Trump haters?
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:56 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
post gifs.
he only learned that recently.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:58 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:He sucks. Pretty much all the new additions to the board do. Looks like he's been around for a while, too. Just discovered this part of TD recently, though.
SDVTiger's vocabulary only has MELT and AMERICA frick YEAH in it.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 6:59 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
AMERICA frick YEAH in it.
I have never posted this
Weird that you would be opposed to that if i did
Posted on 5/18/17 at 7:00 pm to Janky
quote:Nah. Let's just watch it unfold.
Hey prick, let's do a $1000 bet they don't find anything incriminating regarding Trump and he continues on with his presidency. Money goes to winner's charity of choice. I pick St. Jude.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 7:02 pm to AggieDub14
Well after months of FBI investigation and a congressional investigation and no evidence, it really should be. If it was a Democrat this would have been wrapped up by now.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 7:02 pm to AU_Right
He's painfully ignorant
Posted on 5/18/17 at 7:04 pm to AggieDub14
quote:quote:
SDVTiger's vocabulary only has MELT and AMERICA frick YEAH in it.
Yeah. He also knows how to attempt to flame people and post gifs.
I'm trying to find the issue here...
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News