- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DOJ files Appeal
Posted on 2/4/17 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 2/4/17 at 9:18 pm
LINK
quote:
The Justice Department on Saturday evening filed a notice that it will formally appeal a federal judge's ruling halting President Trump's immigration order. Justice Department Attorney Michelle Bennett's filing was made in response to a temporary nationwide restraining order issued Friday that halted Trump's executive order banning citizens of seven countries from entering the United States. The case now goes to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
4
Posted on 2/4/17 at 9:38 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Dear God in Heaven please let Kozinski write the opinion
Posted on 2/4/17 at 9:45 pm to MButterfly
This is likely going to end up before the Supreme Court eventually, as Trump is not one to back down, so what the 9th circuit says shouldn't concern anyone, I think.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 9:48 pm to MButterfly
quote:
Michelle Bennett
Racist literally Hitler bitch. I can assure that her name is already making the rounds.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:10 pm to BMouzone
quote:
This is likely going to end up before the Supreme Court eventually, as Trump is not one to back down, so what the 9th circuit says shouldn't concern anyone, I think.
Well, since the vote by SCOTUS could easily be 4-4, isn't pretty important which side is actually the one to be filing the appeal to SCOTUS? Wouldn't it take 5 votes to overturn the vote of the court below it? That would make the lower court decision pretty important.
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:13 pm to MButterfly
By the time all of this crap is settled, the ban will be over based on the original timeline.
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 2/4/17 at 11:00 pm to TheFonz
quote:
By the time all of this crap is settled, the ban will be over based on the original timeline.
Thats what im saying. The EO will end before any of these cases are settled. The time frame was what a 3 month window and yet people have lost their collective shite thinking it's permanent
Posted on 2/4/17 at 11:02 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
You'd be shocked at how quickly they can move it along if they want to. Bush v. Gore made its way up there in a hurry (I know that's different, just saying it can move quickly).
Posted on 2/4/17 at 11:15 pm to TheFonz
quote:
By the time all of this crap is settled, the ban will be over based on the original timeline.
Actually, I would think the ban would just pick up where it left off on x amount of days and Trump may see fit to add to the length of the ban to further vet the people that came in during the TRO.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:10 am to BMouzone
There is already precedent in this:
See Jimmy Carters ban on Iranian students in 1979. He kicked a bunch of Iranian students out of the nation.
Look up the Immigration and Naturalization law of 1952. This has been law for well over 65 years in this country.
This judge in Washington should immediately recuse himself from this case.
This judge is an 'advocate' for illegal aliens. There is a HUGE conflict of interest.
See Jimmy Carters ban on Iranian students in 1979. He kicked a bunch of Iranian students out of the nation.
Look up the Immigration and Naturalization law of 1952. This has been law for well over 65 years in this country.
This judge in Washington should immediately recuse himself from this case.
This judge is an 'advocate' for illegal aliens. There is a HUGE conflict of interest.
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 12:12 am
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:14 am to Reubaltaich
Do you have any proof of this conflict of interest?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:17 am to Reubaltaich
How is doing advocate work a conflict of interest? Is he profiting from it somehow?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:40 am to Mephistopheles
quote:
How is doing advocate work a conflict of interest? Is he profiting from it somehow?
Don't you think that this judge (who is an advocate for illegals) does NOT have his judgement clouded by his work?
I say it does and he should immediately recuse himself.
IDK if he 'profits' from it or not. But the fact that he is an advocate for illegals shows that his judgement is NOT clear
Posted on 2/5/17 at 12:53 am to Reubaltaich
quote:
Don't you think that this judge (who is an advocate for illegals) does NOT have his judgement clouded by his work?
Having a tendency towards one side of the other is not a conflict of interest.
If that was the case the judicial system would grind to a halt.
quote:
I say it does and he should immediately recuse himself.
Your opinion is meaningless.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 8:47 am to MButterfly
9th Circuit order denying initial Justice Department appeal
9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate travel ban - The Washington Post
LINK
9th Circuit Court declines to quickly reinstate travel ban - The Washington Post
LINK
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News