re: Does anybody here believe that Comey ever told Trump he wasn't under investigation?

quote:

---

JuiceTerry

---

\

Could you at least attempt to be good at this debating thing?

Let me pick you apart, again.

quote:

---

eapons sales aren't necessarily illegal,

---

They are when they are sold to a country that is under an embargo

quote:

---

but that's what was investigated

---

once again you fricking moron, there was ZERO doubt that weapons were illegally sold to Iran. NONE that DID happen. So an investigation into the WHO began. and then investigations into the why, which ultimately led to the Contra part of the deal.

quote:

---

Every single intelligence apparatus agreeing that Russia meddled in a US presidential election demands an investigation

---

I could simply laugh at your reliance in "every single intelligence apparatus" because after all what the frick would the coast guard investigative services know abut Russian meddling? But I won't. Instead I will point out that who cares as okay that's a national security investigation, not a criminal investigation and we have heard MULTIPLE times from MULTIPLE sources that there is ZERO evidence of any criminal wrong doing by Trump or anyone on his team in conjunction with that national security investigation, so what pray tell justifies opening a CRIMINAL investigation? The answer, obviously, is NOTHING. And guess what, there is no fricking criminal investigation into Trump or his campaign into Russian "meddling in our election , exactly as I have been saying for months.

quote:

---

And I'm really sorry if some dumbass members of Trump's team did some dumbass things

---

Being a dumbass and or doing dumbass things isn't a crime and thus of no interest to either the FBI nor a special counsel

quote:

---

It's not like Trump himself didn't literally encourage the Russians to hack emails.

---

Incorrect. He did encourage them to release them if they had them, jokingly but yes he did encourage that, he didn't encourage anyone to hack anything.

And again, encouraging someone to hack into a computer isn't a crime either, and thus of no interest to the FBI or a special counsel.

Now, if he had stood there and said "I will pay VLad $1M US to hack into Hillary's computer and steal her emails and then release them" then yes, under 18 USC 2 you could charge Trump just the same as if he had himself hacked into the server, but that isn't what happened, and it would be a stretch to pretend otherwise.

quote:

---

Simple question. How the hell do you know what evidence there is or isn't?

---

Because a former FBI Director, a Current acting FBI director, a former DNI , the current DNI, a fomer CIA Director, a current CIA Director, the former head of the NSA, 6 Congressman who sit on their intelligence oversight committe and 8 fricking Senators who do the same have all told us "THERE IS NO frickING EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE IN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN COMMITTED ANY frickING CRIMES IN REGARDS TO THE ELECTION"

I mean what the frick dude, do you need a burning bush to appear and tell you "there is no fricking evidence" before you understand?

False. You're spreading fake news.

Yes I do

Why would I believe comey if he differs?

Nobody has ever said trump is under investigation

Funny libs banking on inspector clouseau

There's a difference in saying "there's no evidence of anything" and saying "we can't comment on any evidence regarding collusion at this time". Julian Castro, for one, has stated that the evidence he's seen personally could possibly lead to jail time for certain people.

Mueller is in charge now, anyway. The game has changed. Godspeed.

It would appear that he told Feinstein and Grassley that, so I would say it is not too far out of the realm of possibility that he told Trump that. But, as pointed out...it doesn't matter what we think.

quote:

---

JuiceTerry

---

You need to take up a new hobby, something more suited to your ahem mental acumen , debating just isn't your thing. maybe coloring (by number of course)

quote:

---

There's a difference in saying "there's no evidence of anything" and saying "we can't comment on any evidence regarding collusion at this time"

---

That is NOT what they have been saying. Even Diane Feinstein when asked point blank "any evidence of criminal wrong doing by Trump or anyone in his campaign?" answered "no"

quote:

---

Julian Castro, for one, has stated that the evidence he's seen personally could possibly lead to jail time for certain people.

---

Link to that? He was probably talking about Hillary Clinton LOL

quote:

---

Because a former FBI Director, a Current acting FBI director, a former DNI , the current DNI, a fomer CIA Director, a current CIA Director, the former head of the NSA, 6 Congressman who sit on their intelligence oversight committe and 8 fricking Senators who do the same have all told us "THERE IS NO frickING EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE IN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN COMMITTED ANY frickING CRIMES IN REGARDS TO THE ELECTION"

I mean what the frick dude, do you need a burning bush to appear and tell you "there is no fricking evidence" before you understand?

---

You are shaping quotes from those people to mean what you want them to mean. It's really that simple. You may not actually realize that's what you are doing but you are.