- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Didn't like the Hobby Lobby decision? Look at the follow up decisions
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
It's very appropriate for your shrill whining.
1
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:02 pm to wfeliciana
This decision was not on the merits of the case. All of the hyperventilation is for naught:
LINK
The original story upon which this post was based was so politicized that it left out this important fact. This is a highly contentious case, no doubt, but the hysterics associated with the original story were not necessary.
LINK
The original story upon which this post was based was so politicized that it left out this important fact. This is a highly contentious case, no doubt, but the hysterics associated with the original story were not necessary.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:03 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
All this does is make me get behind Hillary 2016
So I pushed you over the edge? Lil Ole me?
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:03 pm to LSURussian
quote:
It's very appropriate for your shrill whining.
this board knows all about that from 2008 and 2012. You in particular if memory serves.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:04 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
So I pushed you over the edge? Lil Ole me?
No, the court. I don't like Democrats but at least they appoint good SCOTUS justices.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:05 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
How else is he supposed to respond to a retard?
personal attacks
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:05 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I don't like Democrats but at least they appoint good SCOTUS justices.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:06 pm to Vols&Shaft83
You've shown how much your opinion on the subject matters 
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:07 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I disagree. Any justice willing to subvert the 2nd Amendment does not deserve to sit on the court.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:08 pm to Scruffy
quote:
I disagree. Any justice willing to subvert the 2nd Amendment does not deserve to sit on the court.
Shouldn't you be walking around Target with a bazooka in hand right about now?
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Apparently the SCOTUS agrees with me, so
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Our country is being turned into a Corporate Oligarchy by 5 psychotic appointees.
Holy shite, you are coming unglued.
But please, explain how HL is forcing their religious views on anyone.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:10 pm to Vols&Shaft83
yes, 5-4 rulings across party lines is definitely the indication of a legally sound majority decision
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
all you're seeing is government interjecting itself into the system and fricking it up, creating these mythical "rights" out of government entitlement. public entitlements are NOT rights, and this view (as i noted in page one) is pure insanity there is a problem, and it is the ACA removing the freedom of individuals to freely contract with insurance companies
When I read these broad statements and remember you are a lawyer, I am astounded. What happened to the right to life, liberty, and property, and not being denied these without due process of law? Property rights include these entitlements for which you show so much disdain. Are you so flippant when giving your clients legal advice?
As for freely contracting with insurance companies, you failed to mention that the individual doesn't have this great bargaining power to "freely" contract. Your love for the free market ignores the realities therein, the ones that the corporations do not tolerate a la carte contracts, as you are suggesting. Better stick to family law.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:11 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:I have no need for a bazooka. Also, Target is private property. I don't believe they would permit that.
Shouldn't you be walking around Target with a bazooka in hand right about now?
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:12 pm to TK421
quote:
But please, explain how HL is forcing their religious views on anyone.
I've already explained it
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:12 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
yes, 5-4 rulings across party lines is definitely the indication of a legally sound majority decision
That's enough. It's the "law of the land", Bitch
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:14 pm to casualobserver
quote:
As for freely contracting with insurance companies, you failed to mention that the individual doesn't have this great bargaining power to "freely" contract. Your love for the free market ignores the realities therein, the ones that the corporations do not tolerate a la carte contracts, as you are suggesting.
their free market fantasy is nothing but the imposition of the individual being subservient to the corporation.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:14 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
But please, explain how HL is forcing their religious views on anyone.
quote:
I've already explained it
You may think so, but I can assure you you have not succeeded.
Posted on 7/4/14 at 6:15 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
That's enough. It's the "law of the land", Bitch
If all you care about is your side "winning" then congrats
personally I care about, you know, the well being of the country. But that's just me I guess.
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News