- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dems, please read and explain this obvious govt over-reach. Re: ACA
Posted on 4/27/17 at 7:26 am
Posted on 4/27/17 at 7:26 am
LINK
This is the most glaring example of bureaucracy and government over-reach. Please explain the logic behind this.
quote:
Unless the Trump administration takes action, the Obama-era menu-labeling rule will be enforced on May 5. Based on my experience as a pizza restaurant franchisee in Kentucky with 10 stores employing 250 Americans, I know that more value would be produced burning the billions of dollars that the federal government wants businesses to spend complying with these useless regulations.
quote:
We want to be transparent and comply, making accurate calorie counts available to our customers as we have for years already. We just want to do so in a way that makes sense for everyone, without the fear of lawsuits and criminal penalties.
quote:
Domino’s, by then, had already been providing nutrition information online for over a year
quote:
This resulted in four pages being written into the Affordable Care Act in 2009 requiring restaurants with 20 or more locations to provide calorie counts on their menus.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) managed to take these four pages and turn them into more than 150 pages of regulation and guidance.
FDA’s final rule mandated that pizza delivery restaurants include calories on in-store menu boards. Slight problem: More than 90 percent of orders into my stores are placed remotely. Fewer than three percent are placed using a menu board. This is equivalent to the government demanding that everyone with a phone number pay to have it published in a paper phone book despite society’s shift to using the internet to search for contact information.
quote:
There are three other major problems with FDA’s approach.
First, FDA changed the definition of a “menu” to include coupons, advertisements, social media posts, and other communications that in no way should be confused with a menu.
Second, the law does not protect my employees or me from frivolous lawsuits and fines in the event we fail to label a Facebook post or accidentally put too many pepperonis on a pizza such that it fails FDA’s ironically named “reasonable basis” standard.
Beginning May 5, my employees and I could face class actions as well as civil and criminal penalties up to a fine in the thousands of dollars and/or one year in prison for violation of this standard.
Third, FDA gave my employees and me an enormous new paperwork burden. Now we must certify, under pain of those civil and criminal penalties, that we have met FDA’s Orwellian standard.
This is the most glaring example of bureaucracy and government over-reach. Please explain the logic behind this.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 7:27 am to bamarep
The Nanny State at work. Really just frick liberals. They are natural-born pieces of shite
Posted on 4/27/17 at 7:32 am to bamarep
Somewhat related. There was a Freakonomics podcast on nutritional labeling on menus.
The labels resulted in poorer eating less healthy because they were trying to get the best bang (more calories) for their buck.
The labels resulted in poorer eating less healthy because they were trying to get the best bang (more calories) for their buck.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 7:34 am to bamarep
We had a thread about this a few weeks back. The main point was that "most people have POS systems in place and you simpletons don't understand how they work... this will be easy... the customer deserves to know... blah blah blah".
In other words, no good explanation could be provided other than... well... other than nothing.
Shouldn't it be more like "It's a double Big Mac and Large Fry. It's got ALOT of calories"
In other words, no good explanation could be provided other than... well... other than nothing.
Shouldn't it be more like "It's a double Big Mac and Large Fry. It's got ALOT of calories"
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 7:36 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News