- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dear Dictionary, could you please define pithy?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:17 am
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:17 am
I've looked it up. I was dissatisfied.
I felt that it meant: able to illicit emotion from an intellectual with very few words.
It just means forceful/strong. I can't like this.
I'm requesting the PO address of Websters, etc.
I have a formal complaint.
I felt that it meant: able to illicit emotion from an intellectual with very few words.
It just means forceful/strong. I can't like this.
I'm requesting the PO address of Websters, etc.
I have a formal complaint.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:19 am to street pizza
Won't work unless you're a liberal. Only liberals are able to redefine words as they wish them to be.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:20 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Won't work unless
Why you have such sad low energy?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:23 am to street pizza
quote:
able to illicit emotion
You don't deserve my help.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 5:36 am to street pizza
Not sure what your angle is here, but I invite you to use the word "homophobia" on this board correctly. This board will tell you that the dictionary is wrong.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 5:46 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Won't work unless you're a liberal. Only liberals are able to redefine words as they wish them to be.
Like the Trumpkins did with cuckold?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 5:49 am to ballscaster
Name and town....if you wish to opine.
Do not use illicit language and/or drugs when writing The Factor.
It might elicit an unfavorable reaction.
Do not use illicit language and/or drugs when writing The Factor.
It might elicit an unfavorable reaction.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 5:55 am to ballscaster
quote:
Not sure what your angle is here, but I invite you to use the word "homophobia" on this board correctly.
Holy crap, you have gay on the mind! All the time. 24/7. In a thread totally unrelated to gays, you find a way to inject it. Why is that?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 5:58 am to HonoraryCoonass
I didn't say anything about gays. I said something about a word that is misunderstood on this board in a thread about a word that is misunderstood.
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 5:59 am
Posted on 12/7/16 at 6:03 am to ballscaster
What, in your opinion, is the common misunderstanding of the word on this board?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 6:08 am to TrueTiger
Many on this board think it means solely "fear of gays." It does not. Any aversion to or discrimination against gays is, according to both Webster and Oxford, homophobia. I've explained this several times, only to be told that the actual dictionary is wrong.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 6:14 am to ballscaster
Gotcha.
So, we can presume that there is a consensus in the English speaking world (as reflected by Webster, et. al.) as to the meaning.
Of course there can exist a substantial minority that does not agree with the consensus. Word meanings can be subjective after all.
So, we can presume that there is a consensus in the English speaking world (as reflected by Webster, et. al.) as to the meaning.
Of course there can exist a substantial minority that does not agree with the consensus. Word meanings can be subjective after all.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 6:19 am to TrueTiger
quote:Not subjective to the point that Webster and Oxford are wrong. Those two sources are universally accepted as standard in the English speaking world.
Of course there can exist a substantial minority that does not agree with the consensus. Word meanings can be subjective after all.
In other words, I can dig "This word means this in addition to its dictionary definition." For example, in the 1980's, if you said that something was "bad," it could mean "not good" (disctionary connotation) as well as "very very good." But to say that a dictionary definition is wrong is silly and stupid.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 6:53 am to ballscaster
quote:
Not subjective to the point that Webster and Oxford are wrong. Those two sources are universally accepted as standard in the English speaking world. In other words, I can dig "This word means this in addition to its dictionary definition." For example, in the 1980's, if you said that something was "bad," it could mean "not good" (disctionary connotation) as well as "very very good." But to say that a dictionary definition is wrong is silly and stupid.
The dictionary merely state what the word is commonly used to mean.
And many SJW's use the word as you defined it above.
The word was originally (and continues to be) used in that way by the left wing as a political attack against SJW opponents.
The fact of the matter is only democrats use the word with that "political attack" meaning.
To any non-democrat/SJW, the word means what it says (irrational fear).
Since only democrats/SJWs would actually use the word at all (after all, how often do you run across an actual irrational fear of ****s?).
Perhaps the rest of the non-SJW world should make a point of occasionally saying in print "Homophobia, the irrational fear of ****s, is an incredibly rare condition", just so Websters wont get confused.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:47 am to M. A. Ryland
Spin it all you want. I'll use the dictionary definition of words because I speak English.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 9:29 am to ballscaster
quote:
I'll use the dictionary definition of words because I speak English.
The dictionary is not a science book or a mathematics book. It is a maliable [book] of reference written by a committee of egghead editors with their own biases, opinions, and agendas.
Entries in one dictionary sometimes differ from entries in another. Some dictionaries contain words the others do not. Which one do you go by in these cases? Too often, new entries reflect slang originating from the dumbest people among us so that the editors can be mentioned on the news once a year.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:30 am to street pizza
from the word pith. pith is the central spongy part of a stem that transports nutrients.
etymology
Here is wiki
dude. I like that your meaning is based on feeling and that you have feelings about your feeling word. that's charming in a way. But its your own invention.
pith is a part of a plant. its the heart and center.
your idea, that the word relates to a feeling VERSUS an intellectual mind-form is pure invention on your part. sorry.
but its such a great idea, you should invent a NEW word to which you confer the meaning you thought was attached to pithy.
Let us know in this thread what you want your new word to be.
If you use it regularly on TD with an asterisk explaining its meaning, in a few years it will be in common parlance. it happens.
etymology
quote:
pithy (adj.)
early 14c., "strong, vigorous," from pith (n.) + -y (2). Meaning "full of substance or significance" is from 1520s; literal meaning "full of pith" not attested until 1560s. Related: Pithily; pithiness.
Here is wiki
quote:
pithy (comparative pithier, superlative pithiest) Concise and meaningful. 1825, William Hazlitt, Elia, and Geoffrey Crayon, (used) in The Spirit of the Age,
quote:
I felt that
dude. I like that your meaning is based on feeling and that you have feelings about your feeling word. that's charming in a way. But its your own invention.
pith is a part of a plant. its the heart and center.
your idea, that the word relates to a feeling VERSUS an intellectual mind-form is pure invention on your part. sorry.
but its such a great idea, you should invent a NEW word to which you confer the meaning you thought was attached to pithy.
Let us know in this thread what you want your new word to be.
If you use it regularly on TD with an asterisk explaining its meaning, in a few years it will be in common parlance. it happens.
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 10:37 am
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:41 am to HonoraryCoonass
quote:Can you give me some examples of these people and their biases, opinions, and agendas?
egghead editors with their own biases, opinions, and agendas
Posted on 12/7/16 at 11:12 am to ballscaster
quote:
Can you give me some examples of these people and their biases, opinions, and agendas?
Well, you brought "homophobia." Why do some "phobias" have discrimination attached to them, and some don't? That was an editorial decision, not one based on etymology.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News