Started By
Message

Cop charged after shooting man in face after argument

Posted on 2/21/23 at 10:39 pm
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
1333 posts
Posted on 2/21/23 at 10:39 pm
quote:

Clearfield County District Attorney Ryan Sayers and DuBois Police Department Chief Blaine Clark announced the charges against 27-year-old Zachery Allen Dodson during a press conference on Monday, February 20.


Cue the "it's only a few bad ones" crowd... I'm just shocked they haven't yet tried to charge the bar owner with assaulting a law enforcement officer since he had the suspect pinned to the ground to stop him.

LINK /
Posted by El Segundo Guy
SE OK
Member since Aug 2014
9601 posts
Posted on 2/21/23 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

Straight from twelfth grade into junior college
Buddy buddy buddy I passed my exam
Makin' me a law enforcement person
Got me a gun and a badge, I'm a man


Posted by BigMob
Georgia
Member since Oct 2021
7625 posts
Posted on 2/21/23 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

According to court documents, Morrison saw Dodson in the bar acting upset and aggressive, yelling on his phone, and punching windows. When Morrison warned Dodson about his behavior, Dodson allegedly screamed at him. Morrison told Dodson to leave and escorted him out of the bar, but Dodson returned eight minutes later.

Morrison told police that he was speaking with Myrtaj when Dodson came back inside. As Morrison approached Dodson to again tell him to leave, Myrtaj put himself in between the two men. Dodson then allegedly pulled a pistol from a holster on his right hip and pointed it at Morrison.


A good pre-employment background investigation, polygraph exam, and psychological testing can go a long ways in thinning out nut jobs, but take time, cost money, and make it more difficult to fill pressing vacancies. I checked the PD website but couldn’t ascertain anything about their hiring process. Appears to be a small department in a rural area, so I’d be surprised if they did any of those steps prior to hiring a guy.
This post was edited on 2/21/23 at 11:58 pm
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:03 am to
Privatize law enforcement and be done with it.

As long as it’s govt funded you’ll see under qualified and poor applicants hired at low rates.
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
1333 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:16 am to
Aww, five downvotes already. We're making progress but still too many blue-line-bootlickers among conservatives. "Back tha blew" would be their last words as blood filled their lungs after the cops got the wrong address again and barged into their house guns blazing.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11146 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 2:18 am to
quote:

Privatize law enforcement and be done with it.


I don't see how this could possibly be free of even more corruption than government law enforcement, unless people are given the ability to immediately revoke an organization's "charter" so to speak.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10829 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 2:23 am to
quote:

don't see how this could possibly be free of even more corruption than government law enforcement,
well maybe then they wouldn't be immune from civil liability when they get drunk and shoot you in the face
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10829 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 2:26 am to
quote:

We're making progress but still too many blue-line-bootlickers among conservatives
you lmk when your side starts calling out feds for investigating conservative groups and dragging parents out of school board meetings. They just back a (D)ifferent blue
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
1333 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 3:13 am to
My side? You are woefully mistaken if you think I'm a liberal. I'm a true conservative. I support the Constitution unconditionally. I hate cops that trample all over it on a daily basis. Any cop that enforced unconstitutional covid mandates should face the gallows or firing squad. Cops are also no friend of the 2nd Amendment. They've shown they have nothing but contempt for US citizens and the Constitution.

And since when were feds pulling parents out of school board meetings? That's your beloved local cops doing that buddy. Fed, state, and local law enforcement are all thoroughly corrupt.
This post was edited on 2/22/23 at 3:16 am
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
2893 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 3:26 am to
That dude looks to be on the spectrum.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10829 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 5:06 am to
quote:

And since when were feds pulling parents out of school board meetings?
nah garlic just directed the fbi to investigate school board meetings and let the local thugs do the dirty work
quote:

Fed, state, and local law enforcement are all thoroughly corrupt.
The fish rots from the head down
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21593 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 5:16 am to
quote:

Dex Morgan


What's your profession?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123929 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 5:40 am to
quote:

According to the District Attorney, the incident occurred at 12:44 a.m. on Sunday, February 19, when police were sent to a multi-recreational facility and bar called Invictus along DuBois Street for a shooting in progress.
quote:

"multi-recreational facility and bar called Invictus"


LINK
Hey y'all let's go have a few beers, n' do some ax throwin'

This post was edited on 2/22/23 at 8:15 am
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24742 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 6:01 am to
It's easy to see how crazy all you frickers are on here. And on the OT and the SEC board.
This post was edited on 2/22/23 at 6:17 am
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
15000 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 6:02 am to
quote:

Aww, five downvotes already. We're making progress but still too many blue-line-bootlickers among conservatives. "Back tha blew" would be their last words as blood filled their lungs after the cops got the wrong address again and barged into their house guns blazing.




I don't believe in these broad brush arguments. Not all cops are good, this is true, but not all cops are bad either. I prefer to judge folks individually based on their specific actions and merits, or lack thereof
Posted by Gifman
by the mountains
Member since Jan 2021
9342 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 6:05 am to
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7077 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 7:20 am to
quote:

A good pre-employment background investigation, polygraph exam, and psychological testing can go a long ways in thinning out nut jobs, but take time, cost money, and make it more difficult to fill pressing vacancies. I checked the PD website but couldn’t ascertain anything about their hiring process. Appears to be a small department in a rural area, so I’d be surprised if they did any of those steps prior to hiring a guy.


The kind of person who could pass those kinds of tests are not the kind of people they are looking for. The person capable of passing those tests would be hard pressed to be duped into thinking the job of a policeman is particularly hard or dangerous, they would be able to ascertain that the job is neither and would there fore not fit the mold of the modern day policeman in the US who must, by necessity, suffer from irrational fears of the public and their intent to end them or at best maim them. The police are looking for folks with mental health issues (irrational fears) because those issues will drive that person to make arrests at all costs and that is what the pro-police public, also suffering from mental health issues (irrational fears) demand. Not crime prevention, not convictions, but arrests...the easiest part of the job. Thats all that matters.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7077 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Aww, five downvotes already. We're making progress but still too many blue-line-bootlickers among conservatives. "Back tha blew" would be their last words as blood filled their lungs after the cops got the wrong address again and barged into their house guns blazing.


Preach brother preach. How small government, self reliant rugged individuals find so many of their like minded individualists promoting big government intrusion in the form of policemen into the lives of individuals is beyond imagination. The one thing that is for certain is that those people really were never small government types to begin with...they want the government out of their life but like the idea of the government being all up in YOUR business....
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7077 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Cops are also no friend of the 2nd Amendment.


Truer words never spoken and in fact almost all firearm legislation in the US began as an initiative from policemen.

You cannot admire freedom and the police at the same time. You cannot speak of less regulation of industry and commerce while in the same breath extolling the virtues of over regulation of individuals.

You cannot be a conservative in the traditional sense of the word and admire the big government tactics of the police in the US at all levels. What you are is a person who wants the police to leave you alone but frick with anyone different than you or who does not think like you or is not you.....
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
7077 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 7:39 am to
quote:

I don't believe in these broad brush arguments. Not all cops are good, this is true, but not all cops are bad either. I prefer to judge folks individually based on their specific actions and merits, or lack thereof



As it is done in the US today and has been since its inception policing is bad across the board regardless of the relative merits of the individuals employed in the industry. The main measure of success or failure is arrest rates and crime clearance....not crime prevention or even convictions. It is easy to arrest folks, especially when a large segment of the population is of the opinion that one must comply with any and all orders given by a LEO or be killed immediately, even when you have multiple LEOs screaming multiple and conflicting orders at you, making it impossible to comply with all of them.

An arrest should mean the state has pretty good evidence that a crime has taken place and there has to be a victim for almost all crimes. That is like telling folks to stop at an intersection ONLY after they have an accident in the intersection...it would be much better to do something to try to avoid the accident, like put up a stop sign and requiring a stop everytime. Crime prevention should be the goal because the goal ought to be fewer victims of crime. Arrests only mean that, at best, a crime has taken place and someone was victimized.

When they do make an arrest, after failing to prevent a crime and protect the public, they should only be judged on how often they get a conviction which does not include plea deals and jail house snitches and fake evidence. The damage done to society by the state abusing citizens and railroading them into prison is infinitely worse than the damage done to society by the worst of criminals yet we accept those abuses and even defend them in the interest of making us safer when we will say, without a hint of irony, that anyone who would swap freedom for security deserves neither. If you allow the state almost limitless power to take the freedom away from others when the state turns on you you have no one to blame but yourself....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram