- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CNBC Asks Readers If “They Agree With ISIS” That Trump Is An “Idiot”
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:35 am
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:35 am
quote:
LINK
LINK
Imagine if you will, that ISIS spouted-off the same BS propaganda about POTUS Obama and said, Obama is an idiot and CNBC asked social media if they agreed?
I saw CNN the other night do a 'special' series on ISIS and they interviewed ISIS members like they were normal rightious people that were just ticked off baws discriminated against. It was sickening. They are beyond apologists for terrorists.
Whose side is the media on?
5
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:36 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Whose side is the media on?
The Globalists
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:36 am to cajunangelle
" who's side is the media on "
The losing side.
The losing side.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:37 am to cajunangelle
So this is in a way legitimizing ISIS when the whole premise of Obama, during his presidency, not calling ISIS "radical Islamic terrorism" was to not legitimize them. 
This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 8:38 am
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:39 am to cajunangelle
Just because ISIS is an evil terrorist organization, doesn't mean that they can't be factually correct on some issues. I understand your outrage, (can you make a post without mentioning Obama?), but in this case, ISIS is saying something that many agree with. Its kinda funny really.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:40 am to Big12fan
So you are saying you agree with ISIS?
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:41 am to Big12fan
quote:
Just because ISIS is an evil terrorist organization, doesn't mean that they can't be factually correct on some issues. I understand your outrage, (can you make a post without mentioning Obama?), but in this case, ISIS is saying something that many agree with. Its kinda funny really.
who gives a frick what ISIS thinks. thats the point OP is making. ISIS endorses the Democratic Party is how I have been conditioned to understand this thread.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:43 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
ISIS endorses the Democratic Party is how I have been conditioned to understand this thread.
They don't endorse them, but they sure agree on a lot of issues.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:44 am to CajunZ81
Yep, the democrats and Obama couldn't call ISIS out for what they were, terrorists...
Because that would be legitimizing them, you see...
Yet, the MSMedia-AKA the democrat campaign-, thinks it is somehow news reporting that ISIS disses a seated President and invites social media to agree with terrorists. Therefore... the democrats will probably invite ISIS to protest with them @ the next Madonna pussy hat anarchy protest.
I don't care who you are, It is treason, plain and simple.
Because that would be legitimizing them, you see...
Yet, the MSMedia-AKA the democrat campaign-, thinks it is somehow news reporting that ISIS disses a seated President and invites social media to agree with terrorists. Therefore... the democrats will probably invite ISIS to protest with them @ the next Madonna pussy hat anarchy protest.
I don't care who you are, It is treason, plain and simple.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 8:45 am to PsychTiger
quote:
They don't endorse them, but they sure agree on a lot of issues.
nah its just like when David Duke said he was supporting Trump.
ISIS picked a side and now the Democrats must distance themselves. awaiting press conference. Hope Podesta leads off
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:05 am to PsychTiger
quote:
So you are saying you agree with ISIS?
I am not saying that. Poor effort on your part. Try again.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:05 am to PsychTiger
Isis agrees oxygen is vital to survival.
DO YOU AGREE WITH ISIS AAJWOWJEOHSBSWODJDJOEIWJDHJEIW DISINGENUOUS
DO YOU AGREE WITH ISIS AAJWOWJEOHSBSWODJDJOEIWJDHJEIW DISINGENUOUS
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:07 am to cajunangelle
quote:
I don't care who you are, It is treason, plain and simple.
Exactly, what are you calling treason?
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:24 am to Big12fan
Actually... treason and sedition.
Obama, the democrats, and the mainstream U.S. media...
***taking sides with/apologizing (SEE: the CNN series on ISIS basically saying they are confused baws that just need jobs, relief from global warming and prayer rooms.) SEE: former AG Lynch's statement after a terrorist ran over people with a vehicle and used a machete' on them @ OSU. Basically saying discrimination because lack of prayer rooms, while she enhanced the laws and called on people to speak out against hate of this religion; intead of: calling the act-- radical terrorism.
***speaking out against a seated President Trump in agreeing with ISIS terrorists propaganda. Therefore siding with terrorists propagand over America and the President of the United States.
quote:
treason
trez?n
noun
the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
"they were convicted of treason"
synonyms: treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness;
the action of betraying someone or something.
plural noun: treasons[/i]
quote:
sedition
s?'diSH(?)n/
noun
conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
synonyms:rabble-rousing, incitement to rebel, subversion, troublemaking, provocation;
Obama, the democrats, and the mainstream U.S. media...
***taking sides with/apologizing (SEE: the CNN series on ISIS basically saying they are confused baws that just need jobs, relief from global warming and prayer rooms.) SEE: former AG Lynch's statement after a terrorist ran over people with a vehicle and used a machete' on them @ OSU. Basically saying discrimination because lack of prayer rooms, while she enhanced the laws and called on people to speak out against hate of this religion; intead of: calling the act-- radical terrorism.
***speaking out against a seated President Trump in agreeing with ISIS terrorists propaganda. Therefore siding with terrorists propagand over America and the President of the United States.
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:44 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
ARTICLE III, SECTION 3, CLAUSE 1
You confuse treason with critical political discourse. Your definitions do not meet the test for treason against US. Besides, your obvious hatred of Obama and the Democratic Party tarnishes your credibility, however you are good at posting links that support your argument, even if they are biased too.
quote:
Obama, the democrats, and the mainstream U.S. media...
Ridiculous, but have at it. Write your congressman and senators. They will laugh at you like I am.
This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 9:47 am
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:49 am to cajunangelle
Wtodd asks Poli Boarders that if "They Agree With CNBC" they're an idiot.
See how that works?
See how that works?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News