- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CA man who pummeled, shot at female deputy found not guilty despite video of attack
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:52 am
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:52 am
Fox News
A California man who was caught on video pummeling a sheriff's deputy and shooting at her with her own gun in 2019 was found not guilty of attempted murder and other charges by a jury, with the victim saying the decision sets a bad precedent for law enforcement.
A California man who was caught on video pummeling a sheriff's deputy and shooting at her with her own gun in 2019 was found not guilty of attempted murder and other charges by a jury, with the victim saying the decision sets a bad precedent for law enforcement.
10
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:58 am to thebigmuffaletta
CA is lost until the people physically take it back.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:04 am to thebigmuffaletta
This nation is so broken.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:04 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Raj Malin, the defense lawyer, told Los Angeles' ABC 7 that McCarthy did not have reasonable suspicion to justify patting down his schizophrenic client when she arrived on scene.
"The issue was, was the initial detention of Mr. Young legal?" he told the station. "If it's not, then he's not guilty. ... He could punch her 100 times, and it wouldn't matter."
quote:
The defense] argued that she didn't have a lawful authority to detain him, and therefore, he's free to defend himself and do whatever he wants to get away from her, including beating her up and shooting at her," Essayli told Fox News Digital. "That's not correct. That's not the law. And I don't think the judge should have allowed that argument to be presented in that manner."
quote:
California State Assemblyman Bill Essayli, R-Riverside, a former federal prosecutor and deputy district attorney in nearby Riverside County, said the case should have had enough evidence to secure a conviction — and that there may have been anti-police bias in the jury.
No way. Definitely not in California.
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 6:07 am
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:14 am to BobBoucher
Every police officer in every jurisdiction should call in sick for the next three days.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:15 am to thebigmuffaletta
Same dipshits supporting this would want to crucify someone for stopping a shoplifter
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:15 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Every police officer in every jurisdiction should call in sick for the next three days.
This is the way
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:15 am to BobBoucher
quote:
"He could punch her 100 times, and it wouldn't matter."
For frisking a suspect?
This 'lawyer' should immediately be disbarred.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:45 am to SouthEasternKaiju
But it is California so he/she/ it will be a DA in one the shithole cities there.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:58 am to thebigmuffaletta
Colin Flaherty, RIP.
Dindu nuffin.
Dindu nuffin.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:05 am to thebigmuffaletta
And now we know why these animals just need to be put down at the scene. The black supracemcy movement is endangering society with their retribution. Their idolization of thugs instead of good people is sad.
Cops there should strike and let the people blame the people on that jury for what comes their way.
With that said...wood def the cop broad.
Cops there should strike and let the people blame the people on that jury for what comes their way.
With that said...wood def the cop broad.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:09 am to thebigmuffaletta
I’ve been saying for years….just give California to Mexico
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:40 am to BobBoucher
quote:Yep.
The defense] argued that she didn't have a lawful authority to detain him, and therefore, he's free to defend himself and do whatever he wants to get away from her, including beating her up and shooting at her," Essayli told Fox News Digital. "That's not correct. That's not the law. And I don't think the judge should have allowed that argument to be presented in that manner."
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:42 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:For effectively advocating for his client?
"He could punch her 100 times, and it wouldn't matter."quote:
This 'lawyer' should immediately be disbarred.
OK
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:56 am to thebigmuffaletta
I said here not long ago that the truth is no longer the truth it’s whatever you believe the truth to be. I also said thats only a matter of time before that mindset spills into the courtroom with jurors and judges. Well, here we are.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:59 am to AggieHank86
How about for openly advocating physical violence against a (female) police officer? One who is simply doing their job.
If his client feels his rights have been violated, in a normal world, he would file a complaint. But in your twisted world, simply being searched amounts to deadly assault.
If his client feels his rights have been violated, in a normal world, he would file a complaint. But in your twisted world, simply being searched amounts to deadly assault.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 9:18 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:The lawyer did not do that. He was simply explaining his interpretation of the law ... that a citizen has a right to protect himself with physical violence when subjected to an (attempted) unlawful arrest.
How about for openly advocating physical violence against a (female) police officer?
I do not necessarily agree with is interpretation, but it is not inherently unreasonable and it CERTAINLY is not what you characterize.
quote:Where do you people GET this stuff? Do you just pull it out of your arse whenever you see my name? It is HIGHLY entertaining.
in your twisted world, simply being searched amounts to deadly assault.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 9:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The lawyer did not do that. He was simply explaining his interpretation of the law ... that a citizen has a right to protect himself with physical violence when subjected to an (attempted) unlawful arrest.
So, if I interpret you taking an action which I see as an attempt at an unlawful arrest, I can kick six shades of shite out of you and not be found guilty?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 9:25 am to teke184
quote:FFS, and for the third time, HIS INTERPRETATION is that if you believe you are subject to an unlawful arrest ... AND IF THE JURY AGREES THAT THE ATTEMPTED ARREST WAS UNLAWFUL ... you would be found not guilty of assault if you defend yourself.quote:So, if I interpret you taking an action which I see as an attempt at an unlawful arrest, I can kick six shades of shite out of you and not be found guilty?
The lawyer did not do that. He was simply explaining his interpretation of the law ... that a citizen has a right to protect himself with physical violence when subjected to an (attempted) unlawful arrest.
He is making a legal argument. You don't disbar people for making legal arguments with which you disagree ... even if they are wrong.
Should all of Trump's lawyers be disbarred for every non-meritorious argument that they have presented in a court in the last three years?
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 9:27 am
Posted on 6/9/23 at 9:31 am to AggieHank86
My automatic take on this pretty much matched everyone else's around here, but upon further contemplation I'm just going to say this: the feds have already gone full Orwell. It's only a matter of time before this bleeds down to the state and local level. When this happens, I imagine many of us will be faced with making a decision when the illegal searches and seizures start (and we all know it's coming.)
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News