- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Explosive law suit alleges Fox News and Trump pushed Fake News Seth Rich story
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:01 pm to bonhoeffer45
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:01 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
But that is exactly why Fox News will weather this. Half this board will just turn into Hannity to see how they should think about this issue. Wait for Trump's next tweet to find the way they should engage in the cognitive dissonance process for this story.
Dude. Some of these guys are friends, can you not annihilate them like that? It's just a message board.
0
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:02 pm to bonhoeffer45
bonehoeffer, this board is the equivalent of DU or the msnbc forums (if they exist?)
Partisans will always stick to hardcore sources.
One reason WSJ isn't linked more often is because of the paywall.
Partisans will always stick to hardcore sources.
One reason WSJ isn't linked more often is because of the paywall.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:03 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
what makes the editorial section (which forms the VAST majority of clicks on a news site) of national review, wsj, daily caller, the federalist, reason, etc any different than the editorial section of nyt and wapo?
I mean first off standards, quality of contributors, and accountability is typically what differentiates editorial boards from one another.
I would say The Economist, The Weekly Standard, and Reason are at a much different quality then The Fedarlist and The Daily Caller. Russ Roberts is of a different quality then Sean Hannity.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:05 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:Is it?
The narrative of the conspiracy is baseless
Because by that standard ANY thesis thus far is baseless.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:06 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:Love him (Russ, not Hannity). Just loaned one of his books to a friend of mine, actually.
Russ Roberts is of a different quality then Sean Hannity.
I met Russ at a seminar a few years ago. Very cool dude.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:11 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
I don't think there has been more then 1 or 2 threads in the last few weeks you haven't shown up in quoting me
Like William Carlos Williams?Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:15 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:There you go again.
this discredited Fox News lawsuit
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:15 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Love him (Russ, not Hannity). Just loaned one of his books to a friend of mine, actually.
I met Russ at a seminar a few years ago. Very cool dude.
I very much enjoy his podcasts.
I say this as someone that has a lot of fundamental and stark disagreements with him when he moves into the contentious macro-economic policy realm(though plenty I have agreements with as well), but I think he puts in a good effort at being intellectually honest with his audience, acknowledging opinion he has formed as not dogmatic fact, and promoting quality discussion with his guests and giving them a fair shake.
.....You also asked what sort of things differentiates the NYTimes editorials from, say, The Daily Caller, only one of those sites employed Russ Roberts as a regular contributor on their editorial pages for several years.
This post was edited on 8/1/17 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:36 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
One reason WSJ isn't linked more often is because of the paywall.
They make it easy to get around though. You used to be able to just google the article title but they put an end to that. Now you can get full articles from following their links on Twitter.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:45 pm to Decatur
Really? Never knew that!
Does the same trick apply to wapo?
Does the same trick apply to wapo?
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:49 pm to Decatur
Just pay for it. You aren't a poor. 
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The Washington Post(and many X number of articles per month sites) can be worked around by accessing them in incognito mode. I just have a subscription to the WSJ and Post though. So that may have changed with the Post. You'll have to check.
Though I suspect it will only be a short while til they adapt what the Boston Globe started doing and disabling article access when in private mode.
Though I suspect it will only be a short while til they adapt what the Boston Globe started doing and disabling article access when in private mode.
This post was edited on 8/1/17 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 8/1/17 at 4:38 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:I do the same thing with taxes. It's wicked and very unfair, so I am told
can be worked around
Posted on 8/1/17 at 4:46 pm to BBONDS25
Jeff Bezos gets my dollars.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 4:49 pm to Decatur
Oh good. I have been worried about him.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 4:50 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 8/1/17 at 5:29 pm to tigerinDC09
Posted on 8/1/17 at 6:07 pm to NC_Tigah
CTR is all over this thread
Page 14 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News