Started By
Message
locked post

Blake Kenneth Weigand: "No way Trump won the election fairly"

Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:46 am
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:46 am
"I know hundreds of people, and not one of them, not one of them, voted for Trump. Not only did they not vote Trump - they all hated Trump. Statistics say that if I know so many people, and yet none of them voted Trump, than Trump winning is a statistical improbability. Where did all the Trump votes come from? He offended almost every single group of people out there, and yet he was still able to cobble together a coalition to vote him into the White House? It doesn't add up. The notion of Russia interfering with our elections seemed like a silly notion a month ago, but now I am beginning to think it may be an actual possibility. I can offer no other explanation. Trump had the lowest approval ratings of any presidential candidate of all time, and yet he won? It just doesn't make sense at all."
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20381 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:47 am to
Let me guess he lives is SF?
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:47 am to
Close - Seattle
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26446 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:48 am to
"Hundreds"...

Dude needs to GTFO of Seattle at times... He does realize there's another 49 states huh..?

This post was edited on 11/27/16 at 11:00 am
Posted by STLDawg
The Lou
Member since Apr 2015
3691 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:49 am to
His statistics knowledge must not include sampling bias.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
123930 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:53 am to
Blantleigh Spiegel-Antanunez-Goldenbaumstein also doesn't believe Trump won.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32089 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Blake Kenneth Weigand


Who is this and why should I care if he's in a bubble?
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120176 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:55 am to
I know hundreds of people too. And only like 3 or 4 voted hillary
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29120 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:59 am to
Sounds like Pauline Kael regarding Nixon in 1972.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
18990 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:01 am to
Yeah a guy that everyone criticized as having an inferior ground game, a guy who's spending on advertising paled in comparison to his opponent, a guy that a lot of the Repub establishment didn't want and attempted to derail his campaign somehow rigged the election. The amount of money, infrastructure, and support it would take to rig an election on this scale would be a direct contrast to the way Trump ran his campaign.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50248 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:02 am to
Who is this person?
Posted by EGCROSS
Northern Idaho
Member since Dec 2007
1353 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Yeah a guy that everyone criticized as having an inferior ground game, a guy who's spending on advertising paled in comparison to his opponent, a guy that a lot of the Repub establishment didn't want and attempted to derail his campaign somehow rigged the election. The amount of money, infrastructure, and support it would take to rig an election on this scale would be a direct contrast to the way Trump ran his campaign.


Wish I could up vote this more.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68046 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:05 am to
You've posted about 6-8 of these nobodies, as if they matter.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78362 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Statistics say that if I know so many people, and yet none of them voted Trump, than Trump winning is a statistical improbability.



Somebody slept through school.
Posted by ProfessionalAmateur
Member since Apr 2015
1022 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:12 am to
He didn't need to burn money on ads. You turn on the TV, he was on. Either speaking live or MSM "reporting" about him, you knew what was going on. Clinton, on the other hand, had absurd amounts of cash to work with to run ads and had about 5% the number of events that Trump did. Media was doing all the work for her while also doing it for Trump and they got exposed.
Posted by TonyPerkins
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2016
392 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:15 am to
Yep. This makes perfect sence
Posted by SLafourche07
Member since Feb 2008
9928 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:15 am to
Well if we're using his logic, in my world, Trump would have won by about 90 points.
Posted by Ping Pong
LSU and UVA alum
Member since Aug 2014
5346 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:16 am to
I bet he probably flys back and forth between New York and LA and thinks that he knows this whole country.

Flyover states are states too
Posted by Roovelroe
Mandeville
Member since Jan 2005
4372 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:17 am to
This could truly be the dumbest person on theplanet
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
123930 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 11:18 am to
You are missing the point of all these.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram