- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Are any other Trump supporters annoyed by the green card and visa parts of EO?
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:45 pm
Why give the left and the media such good ammo to fight back with? Why not just limit to people trying to come over and not people who've legitimately made it through?
22
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:47 pm to NIH
Kind of. It would've had the same impact though on liberals and they would just ignore the fact that Obama did the same thing for an even longer amount of time.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:48 pm to TitleistProV1X
Well sure, they'd be outraged either way. I think the green card and visa provisions give standing to saying that this was poorly executed.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:49 pm to NIH
If it sticks I am.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:49 pm to NIH
Can you include SA, Egypt and Pakistan as not being part of this as well?
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:50 pm to NIH
quote:
Are any other Trump supporters annoyed by the green card and visa parts of EO?
They are not barring green card holders from entry. I agree that they should not.
I'm totally okay with the rest of this order, and I'm confident that if there are issues that come out of this that this administration would make adjustments.
This post was edited on 1/29/17 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:50 pm to Salmon
Don't give a shite about that.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:50 pm to NIH
I'm not a trumpkin, but was a NeverHillary voter. I want Trump to be successful. Yeah, I don't think it should have included green card holders. They've been vetted. His statement today was good, but 48 hours too late. The whole approach to this was ham handed at best.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:50 pm to NIH
That'll get fixed in the rewrite. It was designed that way. Just sit back and watch.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:50 pm to NIH
No. I think its pretty awesome!
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:51 pm to Salmon
That too
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:52 pm to member12
quote:
They are not barring green card holders from entry.
Interesting. On the home page of the National Review, you had one article saying they were, and another article saying that weren't. Incompetence breeds confusion. The one guy who worked for the US military in Iraq should have walked right in. So he obviously was detained at least for a few hours.
This post was edited on 1/29/17 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:54 pm to NIH
Green cards and legit visas are traveling without problem
They aren't part of the EO
They aren't part of the EO
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:55 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
That'll get fixed in the rewrite.
Most of us remember Kathleen Sebelius saying they were going to get the Obamacare website fixed.
Don't give us rewrites. Do it right the first time, and then have good communications. I don't want to see Kathleen Sebelius moments from this administration.
This post was edited on 1/29/17 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:56 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
On the home page of the National Review, you had one article saying they were, and another article saying that weren't. Incompetence breeds confusion.
I think there was either some confusion over enforcement of the EO or vagueness in the order itself.
Either way, the position of the administration has been clarified and they don't intend ban green card holders from entry. That doesn't mean that they won't get delayed for a while especially over the next few days. We probably need to distinguish between stories about people with legal status being inconvenienced and stories about them actually being barred from entry.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:56 pm to NIH
most new laws take some time to adjust to, as well as work out the kinks, no big deal.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:57 pm to BamaGradinTn
Anybody who says this wasn't handled poorly is being extremely dishonest.
But that has zero to do with this thread's discussion.
But that has zero to do with this thread's discussion.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:57 pm to NIH
It's easier to include everything and then take away then it is to pick some things and add to it later.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 4:01 pm to NIH
What annoys me about it is the way they seemingly didn't put much thought into the implementation. I think they just got a little ahead of themselves, but it unfortunately had real world consequences for innocent people. Going to have to do better in the future.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 4:04 pm to NIH
Yes. I agree with the temporary ban but the way they implemented it is not right at all.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News