- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A list of the 54 Texas Democrats who shot down citizen-only voting rights
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:45 am to BBONDS25
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:45 am to BBONDS25
quote:Barry, that is a circular argument, and you know it.
Because they aren’t US citizens. Good Lord, Hank.
WHY should a local resident not have a say in how his LOCAL taxes are spent?
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Where the HELL do you get this. “Birthright Citizenship” is IMO bad policy, but it is damned explicit in the Amendment.
I don't think it is explicit. It's very vague and questionable. It needs to be challenged and let the Supreme Court rule on it.
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:46 am to Bandit1980
quote:For goodness sake, I have nothing about extending any franchise to ILLEGAL residents.
You can try to spin this any complicated way you want, the fact is they are not legal and should not vote.
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
WHY should a local resident not have a say in how his LOCAL taxes are spent?
Should minors be able to vote in a local election?
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:48 am to AggieHank86
quote:
So, you have no answer either?
Citizenship is the answer but you refuse to except it, why?
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:50 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:Are you asking a legal question or a policy question?
Should minors be able to vote in a local election?
LEGALLY, the Constitution does not prohibit states from setting a minimum voting age below 18yo.
POLICY? Hell, I think dropping it to 18yo nationally was bad policy. Younger? Egads.
Of course, your question is utterly irrelevant to this thread.
This post was edited on 5/25/23 at 11:54 am
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:52 am to GumboPot
quote:Because it is a tautology. (“Citizenship should be required to vote locally because citizenship should be ….”)
Citizenship is the answer but you refuse to except it, why?
You have not provided any logical basis for such a policy.
You are saying “just because …”
This post was edited on 5/25/23 at 11:53 am
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:53 am to AggieHank86
Every argument you have to allow a non-citizen to vote could be made for a 16-year-old citizen.
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:55 am to AggieHank86
Just trying to understand, I can be a citizen of china, come to the USA, rent a room, go to the grocery store and should be able to vote on all elections?
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Barry, that is a constitutional argument,
FIFY
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:59 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Why should legal, permanent residents be banned from voting in local elections by some “higher” governmental unit, if the majority of the local jurisdiction wants to let them do so?
Do you disagree with the founding premise that the government which governs best is that which is closest to the people?
You've got to be a troll, because no one can be this fricking retarded. Yeah, I said retarded. Voting is/should be one of the major rights of a U.S. CITIZEN! You really want to let non-citizens vote. My Lord you are a grade A idiot.
This post was edited on 5/25/23 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 5/25/23 at 11:59 am to GeauxtigersMs36
quote:If that is your understanding of this discussion, you are simply too stupid to deserve a substantive reply.
Just trying to understand, I can be a citizen of china, come to the USA, rent a room, go to the grocery store and should be able to vote on all elections?
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Birthright Citizenship” is I
There apparently arguments that refute your statements
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:05 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Explain the logic
trying to explain logic to a hard core left wing radical is aan exercise in futility, if not a contradiction in terms.
You know the reasons why it is a bad idea - and you know the reason left wing radicals want it so much.
In short - it is just another pile of names that can be used for 'ballot' purposes - and if not by outlright cheating, then as a pressure point for the next outrage about 'disadvantaged voters' or whatever bullshite rolls off the tongues on extreme leftists anytime they want to further muddle an issue.
You want this for the same reason you want more illegal aliens present in the county - to increase the pressure to 'take care of these poor souls' by 'at least' giving them the VOTE to 'determine their own future'
It is the holy grail - extend voting RIGHTS as much as possible - your leaders want it to be lowered to 16 years old, let illegal aliens vote, let prisoners vote, let vagrants vote,
hell - let ANYONE vote if they are in a situation where they are easily misled, are without wisdom to evaluate cause/effect, unconcerned with who they hell is going to have to foot the bill for whatever they 'vote for' etc.
You know it - we know it - we know you know it - you are preaching to the uninformed, uncaring, irresponsible with your rhetoric.
shame on you.
edit - oh - and the clincher - you want more illiterate, irresponsible, dim-witted, parasitic, mentally deficient people represented on the voting rolls. That way your 'harvesters' have TARGETs of you 'harvesters' all bundled up in a group who normally dont even know what a "vote" actually means, could not care less if they did, and are willing to sell out their franchise for another swig of Mogen David.
u know it - we know it - we know u know it
stfu.
This post was edited on 5/25/23 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:16 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
goodness sake, I have nothing about extending any franchise to ILLEGAL residents.
of course you haven't - you would lose your claim to have a modicum of sense.
But you have never disavowed that your DEM leadership has 16 yrs old as their next step after allowing illegal aliens to vote.
Trying to limit you advocacy to 'local elections' is a farce - you know as well as anyone - once that name becomes written down anywhere as LEGAL TO VOTE - regardless of the venue - it is only a matter to time for the push to make them legal to vote statewide, or nationally.
If you deny that - you will be laughed off the board.
Stop with the charade. You are fooling nobody.
This post was edited on 5/25/23 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:22 pm to dafif
quote:The arguments against birthright citizenship basically boil down to a claim that the word “person” does not mean “person,” but rather means “citizen.”quote:There apparently arguments that refute your statements
Birthright Citizenship”
As a textualist, that argument entertains me. The “conservatives” suddenly agree with “liberal” schools of interpretation … when they produce a result that the “conservatives” like.
Again, I think birthright citizenship is atrocious policy. But no Textualist could argue with a straight face that it is not what the Constitution SAYS.
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Well, that would violate specific provisions of the US Constitution (“Equal Protection” and such) which DO SPECIFICALLY apply to the States, so probably not.
great - how about the constitutional declaration that the state legislatures are the sole definers of the time, method, location, and procedure for elections.
But your current POTUS and control of the SENATE is solely based on the EXECUTIVE branch usurping how voting was done in the states that had the 'big glitch' on election night. And 'went to war' against any notion that the Legislature should interfere with what the Executive branch DID that were counter to the rules established by the Legislature.
Excuse me if I am not up on the words-of-art to engage in lawyer-speak, you you know what the hell I am talking about and I am not inclined to learn that arcane mode of expression.
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:26 pm to 19
I mean there are some common sense solutions to make this a reasonable law without being over the top.
Local governments may institute their own policies regarding who is eligible to vote, but with certain common sense rules in place.
1) US citizens all have the right to vote in those elections as residents of said voting district. The only exception is if they forfeited that right such as by committing a felony.
2) Permanent Residents (Green Card holders) that obtained their status via legal entry into the US may be granted the right to vote in their district by that district's local government.
3) Anyone else that is either not a permanent resident (e.g. visiting/work/student visas) or anyone else that had entered the country illegally (i.e. even if they have permanent residence but cannot prove a legal entry into the country) will not be granted rights to vote in any district.
That is common sense. It rewards permanent members of the community that followed the law to a right in local elections (not for national elections), and prohibits others through the law.
Local governments may institute their own policies regarding who is eligible to vote, but with certain common sense rules in place.
1) US citizens all have the right to vote in those elections as residents of said voting district. The only exception is if they forfeited that right such as by committing a felony.
2) Permanent Residents (Green Card holders) that obtained their status via legal entry into the US may be granted the right to vote in their district by that district's local government.
3) Anyone else that is either not a permanent resident (e.g. visiting/work/student visas) or anyone else that had entered the country illegally (i.e. even if they have permanent residence but cannot prove a legal entry into the country) will not be granted rights to vote in any district.
That is common sense. It rewards permanent members of the community that followed the law to a right in local elections (not for national elections), and prohibits others through the law.
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:26 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:The average LEGAL non-citizen resident is FAR more-educated and smarter than the average citizen. You are arguing against LEGAL residents with premises applicable only to ILLEGAL residents. That is called a “bait and switch.”
you want more illiterate, irresponsible, dim-witted, parasitic, mentally deficient people represented on the voting rolls. That way your 'harvesters' have TARGETs of you 'harvesters' all bundled up in a group who normally dont even know what a "vote" actually means, could not care less if they did, and are willing to sell out their franchise for another swig of Mogen David.
Shame on you.
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:28 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:Do some Dems want to extend the franchise to 16yos? Sure. It would never pass, so who cares about the desires of a tiny minority of one party?
DEM leadership has 16 yrs old as their next step after allowing illegal aliens to vote.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News