- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4th Circuit COA and dissent in Halbig are hilariously wrong about "intent"
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:19 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 7/25/14 at 7:19 pm to Vols&Shaft83
0
Posted on 7/28/14 at 10:33 am to MMauler
quote:
the Secretary shall (directly or through agreement with a not-for-profit entity) establish and operate such Exchange within the State
I'm confused. If the Federal government (or it's appointed not-for-profit) establishes and operates such an Exchange and it's considered (by the law) to be a State agency, who is paying for it? The State, the Federal government or the non-profit?
If it's the State, can the Federal government mandate that a State create an agency? If it's the Federal government or non-profit then how is it considered to be a State agency?
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News