SEC doesn't want any part USC

I love how he talks about us playing cupcakes in recent years and talks about the powerhouses they have played. And then mentions they played Fresno State (which we played in '06, and our fans complained it was too easy of an opponent) and talks about Notre Dame. What a joke.

quote:

---

i, like most, have been very bitter towards sc for the past four years cause of the "split" championship. so, for the past four years i wanted to play them in the mnc game. however, this year is NOT the year that i want to see them in the championship.

---

I mean I think we would be a heavy underdog in this game, but I really don't think we would get blown out or anything. Our lines, D, and running game would keep it close. Hell if the two-headed Hatch/Lee monster could manager the ball well, we could win. Remember that we truly have been neck and neck with them the past several years in terms of talent. If you think that's not true, go look at the past few NFL drafts.

quote:

---

i, like most, have been very bitter towards sc for the past four years cause of the "split" championship. so, for the past four years i wanted to play them in the mnc game. however, this year is NOT the year that i want to see them in the championship.

---

It's tough to say, because I don't really think they've been tested yet. Yeah, I would put them at #1 right now, I think you'd have to. But I don't think they're a notch above us by any means. I think we'd hang right there with them, and it'd be a close game.

quote:

---

I mean I think we would be a heavy underdog in this game

---

right. and that's why i don't want to see them this year. the past few years, i would have said that we were neck and neck which is the primary reason that i wanted to play them.

quote:

---

I love how he talks about us playing cupcakes in recent years and talks about the powerhouses they have played. And then mentions they played Fresno State (which we played in '06, and our fans complained it was too easy of an opponent) and talks about Notre Dame. What a joke.

---

People out here are such casual fans of football that if a team was good at some point in the last 10 years they probably consider them a good opponent.

The thing they don't recognize it that their conference is loaded with cupcakes.

i wish people would stop talking about the cupcakes that are scheduled. only the smart teams schedule these cupcakes. we don't have a playoff yet. it doesn't matter if we play cupcakes, hell, i encourage it. we have to run through the sec and that, by itself, will justify a good chance at the bcs title game (no offense auburn). so i say: scheduling cupcakes is a very smart move.

We DO have a playoff...it's called the SEC Schedule.

Say what you want brother but there were many facts missing from that article. One is the fact that USC hasn't played an upper level SEC team in that span. And that when an SEC team has made it to a BCS title game, they are what... 4-0?!!! What is USC's record in BCS title games - I believe 1-1. And this perception that they are all-world, well, I believe the "gurus" were saying the same thing last year. SEC teams look mediocre against each other because the competition IS that good. Have a nice day!

quote:

---

for the past four years i wanted to play them in the mnc game. however, this year is NOT the year that i want to see them in the championship.

---

This is the correct response. Anyone who thinks we are on USC's level this year is seriously kidding themselves. Unless our QB situation improves substantially, USC is head and shoulders above us this season.

The only reason that they lost 2 games the past two years is because John David Booty sucked donkey balls. That shouldn't have come to a surprise to anyone.

The only question about USC in my mind coming into this season was Sanchez, and he has been fantastic so far, so I see no reason they'll lose any games in the regular season seeing as how the PAC 10 is SO wesk this year.