Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Mass Wikipedia gender imbalance edit this weekend, anyone going?

Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:34 pm
Posted by Horsemeat
Truckin' somewhere in the US
Member since Dec 2014
13531 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:34 pm
Should be a great event that will accomplish next to nothing, which is what we're all used to seeing with this crap.

LINK

quote:

This Saturday, one tech-savvy group is hoping to correct a major gender imbalance on the internet. After the recent, much publicized GamerGate controversy, in which several female developers and cultural critics were victims of a “sustained campaign of misogynistic attacks” and advanced trolling, this help is certainly needed. The Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, currently in its second year, is an all-day mass update of Wikipedia entries pertaining to art and women, meant to increase female involvement with, and coverage on, the predominantly male website. Wikipedia’s problems with gender distribution are legendary, and a 2011 survey by the Wikimedia Foundation found that less than 8.5% of contributors were female. This has led (by default) to a paucity of entries on seminal women—especially in the arts. To help rectify this, on March 7th, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) will turn the Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building into mission control for a vast international effort to help promote, create, and edit articles on female artists and movements. At last year’s event, participants at 31 locations created more than 100 new articles and added content to another 90. This year’s Edit-a-thon, falling conveniently on International Women’s Day weekend (March 7-8, 2015), will incorporate 55+ satellite events internationally, taking place simultaneously at the Stedelijk Museum in the Netherlands, the Dowse Art Museum in New Zealand, the National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington, DC. and many others.



This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 7:36 pm
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65688 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:38 pm to
To the activists: Show us where the Internet touched you:

This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 7:39 pm
Posted by MadMaxwell
The Motherland
Member since Jul 2009
4599 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:39 pm to
Oh wow. 190 articles added or edited, which makes up about .004% of the articles on Wikipedia.





Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:40 pm to
Read 4 lines. Couldn't make it through.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

This has led (by default) to a paucity of entries on semin


Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

a paucity of entries on seminal women —especially in the arts.


They'd be seminal after entry if they hit "ladies night" more often.
Posted by Horsemeat
Truckin' somewhere in the US
Member since Dec 2014
13531 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

They'd be seminal after entry if they hit "ladies night" more often.



Did you see the pics? IWNHI

This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 7:43 pm
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:44 pm to
Gender equality on wikipedia and video games. You have to be a count to get all pissy about that. It's not a "misogynistic attack", it's the definition of a count. What a bunch of counts. Why are they given a voice? Who can put up with them?
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22155 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:47 pm to
That is, no doubt, exactly what I expected these women to look like.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71077 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Wikipedia’s problems with gender distribution are legendary, and a 2011 survey by the Wikimedia Foundation found that less than 8.5% of contributors were female.


Um, are they aware of how Wikipedia works?? There is no gatekeeper. Literally anyone with an Internet connection can edit most pages (a few pages are restricted to established users, due to frequent vandalism). You also don't have to interact with other users. So there is literally nothing stopping women from participating.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141926 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Wikipedia’s problems with gender distribution are legendary
Legendary
leg·end·ar·y
adjective

1. of, described in, or based on legends.
"a legendary British king of the 4th century"
synonyms: fabled, storied, heroic, traditional, fairy-tale, storybook, mythical, mythological

2. remarkable enough to be famous; very well known.
"her wisdom in matters of childbirth was legendary"
synonyms: famous, celebrated, famed, renowned, acclaimed, illustrious, esteemed, honored, exalted, venerable, well known, storied, popular, prominent, distinguished, great, eminent, preeminent
Posted by prince of fools
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
1130 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 7:58 pm to
Feminists are GREAT at choosing their battles.

Tackling sexism in Saudi Arabia? Too hard.

Tackling rape in India? Too hard.

Let's just edit some webpages.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram