Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Cigarettes: A product that kills two out of three of its users

Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:09 pm
Posted by Street Hawk
Member since Nov 2014
3459 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:09 pm
quote:

This study, put together by investigators from the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health at the Australian National University, followed 204,953 men and women over 45 years old from New South Wales, Australia. These participants were categorized into groups of smokers, past smokers, and never smokers.

The investigators found the percentage of smokers was comparable among men and women. They also found that current smokers were likely to be younger than never smokers, and they were less likely to live in urban areas. Current smokers had lower income and education when compared to never smokers, and they were less likely to hold private health insurance. Finally, current smokers were more likely to report consuming over 15 alcoholic drinks a week and were more likely to have a higher body mass index.

(These factors were accounted for when the mortality statistics were examined.)

Epidemiological outcomes are typically reported in terms of “Relative Risk”, which describes the proportion of the risk of an outcome that can be attributed to a specific factor. In this study, the relative risk of death (known as mortality) for male and female smokers showed that they were approximately 2.76 and 2.95 times more likely to die than never smokers. Quitting helps; male and female past smokers were 1.27 and 1.39 times more likely to die than never smokers. These numbers, while not surprising given the large body of data on the risks of smoking, are nonetheless a staggering reminder of the quantifiable risks of smoking.

LINK
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:11 pm to
Everyone's gonna die anyway.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58551 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

2.76 and 2.95 times more likely to die than never smokers


This reporting really should have been edited better.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22666 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

mortality) for male and female smokers showed that they were approximately 2.76 and 2.95 times more likely to die than never smokers.


so the non-smokers never died? Wow!
Posted by MrPackSix
Lakeview/God's Country
Member since Oct 2009
8220 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:12 pm to
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26575 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:12 pm to
It is staggering to me how much quitting helps. You can smoke for 20 years, quit, and your mortality risk is not even close to what it would be if you just continued on.
Posted by Team Vote
DFW
Member since Aug 2014
7730 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:13 pm to
I'd argue that non smokers are equally as likely to die as smokers.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57257 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:13 pm to
this is why weed should be illegal
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:14 pm to
Have to die of something
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

I'd argue that non smokers are equally as likely to die as smokers.


Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:14 pm to
At least I know how I'm going out.
Posted by MBclass83
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
9347 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:15 pm to
Nerds rule the world, BTW.


And cancer from smoking is a very ugly death.
This post was edited on 3/2/15 at 1:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram