- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you rather have Andrew Luck or Russell Wilson as your QB?
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:10 pm to cascadia
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:10 pm to cascadia
Would you rather have Dan Marino or Trent Dilfer as your QB?
quote:
Who has more SBs and SB appearances? I'll go with that guy
This post was edited on 2/26/15 at 6:11 pm
2
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:15 pm to WarmBubble
In 4 years, Luck will be 26 and Rodgers 32. It's a toss up for league MVP year in and year out IMO (assuming Colts and Packers are still making the playoffs) because by that time Brees, Brady, and Manning will be retired. Who else will challenge them? Wilson? Cam? Flacco? Don't think so.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:17 pm to WarmBubble
Rodgers will be 35 in 4 years
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:17 pm to WarmBubble
quote:
because by that time Brees, Brady, and Manning will be retired.
Bree's and Brady will be playing IMO
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:18 pm to ClientNumber9
Luck, anyone who picks Wilson doesn't understand basic football fundamentals
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:21 pm to ClientNumber9
I am a big fan of Russell Wilson, but I would take Luck everyday and twice on Sunday.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:23 pm to ClientNumber9
Luck
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:26 pm to goldenbadger08
quote:
Would you rather have Dan Marino or Trent Dilfer as your QB? quote:Who has more SBs and SB appearances? I'll go with that guy
Same appearances, one a piece. Dilfer won his Marino lost his. If your implying that would pick Dilfer over Marino I won't call you stupid. Because its obvious your mentally challenged. If Marino had played his career with the defense Dilfer had with the Ravens he might have 6 or 7 super bowl wins.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:27 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
Same appearances, one a piece. Dilfer won his Marino lost his. If your implying that would pick Dilfer over Marino I won't call you stupid. Because its obvious your mentally challenged. If Marino had played his career with the defense Dilfer had with the Ravens he might have 6 or 7 super bowl wins.
I think you're confused
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:29 pm to WarmBubble
quote:How are you so wrong about their ages? Was it a blind guess?
In 4 years, Luck will be 26 and Rodgers 32.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:30 pm to StealthCalais11
quote:
Luck & it's not even close.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:30 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
If Marino had played his career with the defense Dilfer had with the Ravens he might have 6 or 7 super bowl wins.
In fairness if Dilfer played his while career with the 2000 Ravens defense he also would have won 6 or 7 super bowls
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:32 pm to SabiDojo
First 3 years in the league-
Luck had 86 TD passes & 43 Ints
Manning had 85 TD passes & 58 ints
Rodgers had 1 TD pass & 1 pick | Rodgers next 3 years 86 TD & 31 ints
Luck had 86 TD passes & 43 Ints
Manning had 85 TD passes & 58 ints
Rodgers had 1 TD pass & 1 pick | Rodgers next 3 years 86 TD & 31 ints
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:32 pm to goldenbadger08
I'm using the Tom Brady argument. Or does that only come into effect for him only?
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:39 pm to Meatball
For some reason Luck (like Favre) goes completely unscathed for being the turnover machine he is. Anyone who believes Luck is the best QB in the league right now is a brain dead simpleton.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:46 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
Luck, anyone who picks Wilson doesn't understand basic football fundamentals
Luck ... Unless the opponent is the Patriots. The Patriot have dominated Lucks arse since he got into the league.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 6:53 pm to ClientNumber9
Luck.Wilson has a better OL,RB,Defense.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 7:00 pm to ClientNumber9
To start their careers, Russell Wilson = Tom Brady and Andrew Luck = Peyton Manning. Russell Wilson, like Tom Brady, started out on a team with a great defense and he only had to be a game manager. Andrew Luck, like Peyton Manning, started out on a team driven by huge offensive numbers and a bad defense. The Seahawks, like the Patriots, won by defense. The Colts, like the Colts, won by offense.
quote:
Stats (first 3 FULL years):
Tom Brady: 10,227 passing yards, 71 TD, 38 INT, 35 fumbles, completion % roughly 62, 201 rushing yards
Russell Wilson: 9,950 passing yards, 83 TD, 26 INT, 28 fumbles, completion % roughly 63, 1,877 rushing yards
quote:
Defense ranking (first 3 FULL years)
New England Patriots: can't find (2002), 1st (2003), 2nd (2004)
Seattle Seahawks: 1st (2012), 1st (2013), 1st (2014)
quote:Individual statistics and the eye test point to Andrew Luck being better, but team accomplishments (Super Bowl wins and appearances) point to Russell Wilson being better.
Stats (first 3 FULL years)
Peyton Manning: 12,287 passing yards, 88 TD, 58 INT, 14 fumbles, completion % roughly 60, 251 rushing yards
Andrew Luck: 12,957 passing yards, 98 TD, 43 INT, 28 fumbles, completion % roughly 58, 905 rushing yards
Posted on 2/26/15 at 7:01 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:No kidding.
For some reason Luck (like Favre) goes completely unscathed for being the turnover machine he is. Anyone who believes Luck is the best QB in the league right now is a brain dead simpleton.
I believe Andrew Luck had the second most turnovers in 2014 only behind Jay Cutler.
Posted on 2/26/15 at 7:03 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:In 4 years? Tom Brady would be 41 years old and Drew Brees would be 40 years old.
Bree's and Brady will be playing IMO
No way in hell.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News