Which is more important to you - RT Audience Score or RT Tomatometer?

I occasionally browse the M/TV board so I wanted to see which RottenTomato metric is more important/influential to you all. Personally, if there is a movie I find interesting, a bad score in either metric will not deter me from seeing the film.

However, with the more obscure titles or films that don't peak my interest immediately, I find the Audience Score is usually my go-to factor for whether or not I'll watch the film. I hate to sound like just another sheep, but I feel as though the Audience Score is a better predictor of whether or not I find the film enjoyable. To put it another way, I'm much more inclined to view a movie with a poor Tomatometer score (<50%) but a >60% Audience Score than I am if the ratings were reversed.

I wish RT allowed you to sort movies by the Audience Score rather than the Tomatometer. That omission seems pretty significant and it is the reason I prefer IMDB top lists over RT, although I use RT much more with new features.

Anyway, the Birdman/Whiplash thread sparked my interest in how the board views these things. For reference: