- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Auburn and Tennessee Spend Twice as Much as LSU on Football Recruiting
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:11 pm
quote:
Football Recruiting
Here's what Football Bowl Subdivision schools told the NCAA they spent to recruit football players during the 2012-13 school year
quote:
No public school spent more on football recruiting than the SEC's Tennessee, with an average of nearly $1.3 million annually — 36% more than any other major college program. Tennessee was the only school over that span to average a seven-figure expenditure for recruiting expenses, which include transportation as well as lodging and meals for both recruits on school visits and coaches on recruiting trips.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/recruiting
Alabama SEC $983,721
Arkansas SEC $615,252
Auburn SEC $1,384,188
Florida SEC $687,227
Georgia SEC $581,531
Kentucky SEC $504,421
LSU SEC $577,442
Mississippi SEC $557,208
Mississippi State SEC $468,536
Missouri SEC $631,630
South Carolina SEC $302,249
Tennessee SEC $1,292,544
Texas A&M SEC $401,167
quote:
As a new class of recruits begins formalizing school choices on Wednesday's national signing day, a USA TODAY Sports analysis also finds that in football recruiting budgets, as in many other ways, the gulf between the Football Bowl Subdivision's haves and have-nots is growing substantially.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:13 pm to Shexter
Tennessee sort of makes sense given how much of their recruiting has to be done out of state. Auburn, I'm not sure about.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:14 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Until recently TN didn't really produce much talent. UT has always had to travel to recruit.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:14 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Tennessee sort of makes sense given how much of their recruiting has to be done out of state. Auburn, I'm not sure about.
Probably because they both suck!
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:20 pm to Shexter
We are the only team in the sec that can literally stay home and build a great class.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:21 pm to dreaux
quote:
We are the only team in the sec that can literally stay home and build a great class.
Florida
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:21 pm to dreaux
quote:
We are the only team in the sec that can literally stay home and build a great class.
If Richt could lock down his state, UGA would be in the same boat.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:25 pm to Y.A. Tittle
most of our recruiting base is in Louisiana. thank our talent pool.
Tennessee is not so fortunate
Tennessee is not so fortunate
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:26 pm to Y.A. Tittle
most of our recruiting base is in Louisiana. thank our talent pool.
Tennessee is not so fortunate
Tennessee is not so fortunate
Posted on 2/4/15 at 1:46 pm to Acadien
Not this class as we needed to get other positions.
We should have gotten 2 LB, 1 DT, and 1-2 more DE instead of 2 more WR, punter, snapper, etc...
We should have gotten 2 LB, 1 DT, and 1-2 more DE instead of 2 more WR, punter, snapper, etc...
Posted on 2/4/15 at 2:47 pm to ironsides
quote:
Tennessee sort of makes sense given how much of their recruiting has to be done out of state. Auburn, I'm not sure about.
You have to pay more to get someone to go to Auburn!!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News