Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Question for those currently in public accounting

Posted on 1/19/15 at 11:20 am
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158761 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 11:20 am
How is your firm handling the changes to the repair regs, specifically Form 3115? This stuff is a damn nightmare.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:12 pm to
Many CPAs I've spoken with have decided to take the approach of doing nothing and waiting for the IRS to raise the issues. There is no way the IRS can possibly process the required volume of 3115s much less examine returns for all of the possible changes in accounting methods. So why incur the administrative costs of administrative compliance when you can just implement the changes. If audited you just demonstrate your substantial compliance with the accounting requirements without the formality of preparing and filing the 3115s. There shouldn't be a large tax impact, and the examination shouldn't be as costly in professional fees as strict compliance with the regs.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:18 pm to
Loading up on bullets. It's awful.

We purchased a turnkey solution from a CPA firm in the northeast. I'm not sure if I'm allowed to post the name of the company on here (don't want to be accused of advertising). It basically contains tons of resources, training videos, templates, client letters, etc. It's been very helpful for us.

Last year we started preparing our clients for the changes. Then, last month, we did a client mailing that explained in brief the changes, and contained some sample capitalization policies. We are requiring each client that has fixed assets to have a written capitalization policy this year. We also explained in the letter that compliance fees will increase, due to the 3115s and the required adjustments, but, we are hopeful that the adjustments will allow us to write off some previously capitalized items, as well as expense more each year. Thus, maybe, we can save them more in tax than the increased compliance costs.

Starting last month, we have had our clients, when they are otherwise not chargeable, start looking at depreciation schedules for what we need to do for each client, and start filling out Form 3115s. We intend for many clients to have the 3115 filled out before we work on the tax return - because they require a separate signature.

Now, as we are about to start to start getting some 3115s signed and filed, last Friday, IRS issued new guidance on how to file the forms. The guy who we bought the toolkit from advised us to stop preparing the 3115s as he believes THE IRS WILL REDO THE FORM very shortly.

We are increasing our processing fee for each client that has fixed assets, and of course, filing out the forms and making the adjustments will result in additional hourly costs.

Between this and ACA, we are expecting record billable hours this tax season. =)

Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Many CPAs I've spoken with have decided to take the approach of doing nothing and waiting for the IRS to raise the issues


That's pretty dangerous for your clients. Plus, aren't you signing tax returns? So essentially you are signing a return that you know is not correct? (Since a copy of the 3115 needs to be added to the tax return).

I agree with your comments about IRS processing. But I think what will happen is that when a client is audited, the issue will come up.

The rules are the rules. I don't like them one bit, but I can't in good faith tell my clients to ignore them.

ETA: I don't mean you personally... you did not say what you personally were doing for your clients.
This post was edited on 1/19/15 at 12:25 pm
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158761 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

There is no way the IRS can possibly process the required volume of 3115s much less examine returns for all of the possible changes in accounting methods


its almost seems like this was purely a political move to get their budget upped. Thinking the majority of these forms end up in a dumpster
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:42 pm to
Many 3115s already do. The IRS agents I have spoken with expect the forms to go straight to files without any review. They will likely be purged from the system before anyone ever even logs receipt of them.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

The IRS agents I have spoken with expect the forms to go straight to files without any review.


Yeah, I don't know of a single IRS field agent that is actually happy about these forms.

I do wonder why the IRS could not have either simplified the process, or, just made a blanket waiver for everyone. I'm sure they have the rule making authority to do that.

I've been telling people that only the federal government could REQUIRE you to make a change in how you calculate something, and tell you that you have to ask for PERMISSION to make that change. Even thought the permission is automatic, it's completely insane to go through that exercise.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:50 pm to
Not really. The clients will implement the required changes in accounting to comply with the regs. They will choose not to incur the costs of preparing the 3115s necessary for strict compliance. This does not apply to large corporations who are regularly audited, but to smaller taxpayers who are ill suited to paying the administrative costs of compliance.

Just an example of some of the complexity involved, and the uncertainty, what is the unit of property for a pipeline? How many 3115s should the owner file for a given stretch of the pipeline? What about a hotel? What is the unit of property? Is each room a separate unit of property requiring a separate 3115? Rather than just guessing and hoping for the best, many will make a good faith effort to adopt the changes and then let the IRS assess the propriety of their efforts after the fact.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158761 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:56 pm to
only concern with not doing a 3115 is when I came upon this....

quote:

Q. I can’t really afford an extra tax return fee this year. What if I don’t file a Form 3115?

A.The IRS has stated they will wait until all 2014 returns have been filed before auditing these TPR issues [LB&I-04-0313-001], and then scrutinize returns that did not include a Form 3115 with their 2014 tax return. Generally, it is presumed that essentially every business with material and supplies or depreciation has been using an incorrect method of accounting, because the final regulations adopted some new guidance contrary to “how it was always done before.” Chances of a tax return audit increase significantly if a Form 3115 is not filed.

In addition, if your tax preparer signs your return without your compliance of the regulations, they may be at risk of penalty and disbarment (Reg §§ 10.50 & 10.51) for violating their professional standards (Circular 230) by having knowledge of your noncompliance (Reg §10.21) yet still signing your tax return in reckless disregard of the regulations (Reg §10.34).


Likely bullshite scare tactics....but still....

This post was edited on 1/19/15 at 12:57 pm
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 1:17 pm to
The OPR does not have the manpower to pursue sanctions against all return signers, and at the same time those who file fraudulent returns. Who do you think will be the priority?

I will argue that the disregard for following the regs was not reckless, but well considered, and in the client's interests. The taxpayer will have determined his tax properly and reported the proper amount of tax. The return is substantially correct even though the form of the return is incorrect.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 1:19 pm to
Poodlebrain, what are y'all doing for clients that can take a 481a adjustment that would result in less taxable income in 2014? Are y'all looking at that and doing the 3115s in that case?

We are finding with a fair number of properties, that we are able to take some nice write-offs in 2014. Now granted if you didn't do this, then the deprecation would continue to just run. My fear is, if you didn't make the required adjustment in 2014, could the IRS deny continuing to depreciate that item in future years? And you end up with no deduction at all?

For example, say you did some work on a building 4 years ago and are now depreciating 27.5 years. Under the new regs, it should have been written off. So, you take the balance as a 481a adjustment in 2014.

If you did not take the balance as an adjustment, could the IRS say that you improperly took depreciation deductions after 2013, as the new regs require that asset to no longer be depreciated?
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 11:12 pm to
Any tax savings is just a timing issue while the costs to determine the 481(a) adjustment and file the 3115 are actual cash expenses. The favorable 481(a) adjustments would have to be pretty significant to be economically beneficial to the client. I explain the situation to clients and let them decide whether to file the 3115, which I view as seeking permission, or not file the 3115 which might result in the need to ask for forgiveness.

For most of my clients with residential rental properties the expenses that would be reclassified as repairs just wouldn't be that material. Most of the recent material repairs were of damages caused by Hurricane Gustav, and those were deducted as casualty losses from a declared disaster.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158761 posts
Posted on 2/13/15 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

We are pleased to be able to offer this relief to small business owners and their tax preparers in time for them to take advantage of it on their 2014 return,” said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. "We carefully reviewed the comments we received and especially appreciate the valuable feedback provided by the professional tax community on this issue.”

The new simplified procedure is generally available to small businesses, including sole proprietors, with assets totaling less than $10 million or average annual gross receipts totaling $10 million or less. Details are in Revenue Procedure 2015-20, posted today on IRS.gov.


about damn time......assholes
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 2/13/15 at 4:39 pm to
Was actually in a meeting with some of our younger staff discussing some repair regs issues we have been seeing, when this thing dropped. Got back to my office and had like 6 missed calls and about a dozen e-mails from other CPAs I know.

I do believe this was a last minute thing, as the rev proc is horribly written and hard to follow.
Posted by AbsolutTiger
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2006
4796 posts
Posted on 2/14/15 at 11:30 am to
The AICPA is supposedly working with the IRS on it. We've decided to hold the business returns for a few days to see if there is any resolution before filing all these 3115s.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/14/15 at 12:08 pm to
Interesting discussion fellas.

I wasn't even aware of this new form/requirement so I learned something on it and the practicality of it.

I'm pretty much entirely international now and have my own nightmare called FACTA to play with.
Posted by Serraneaux
South of 30a
Member since Mar 2014
19662 posts
Posted on 2/15/15 at 11:44 am to
If we have changed our cap policy to $5,000 in 2014 from $500, is this a change that needs to be filed on a 3115 form? The CPA form told us to just change our policy and reclass to a small assets expense account from our Section 179 account for fixed assets.

Posted by Serraneaux
South of 30a
Member since Mar 2014
19662 posts
Posted on 2/16/15 at 1:08 am to
Can Gil answer my question?
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 2/16/15 at 3:24 am to
I feel vindicated in my decision to advise my clients to apply the regs prospectively without going through the administrative reporting requirements. It seems the IRS realized that compliance was economically impossible for small businesses and applied some common sense. I don't understand why they insist on having larger businesses go through the 3115 process. Couldn't they just use the existing examination system to check compliance?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram