Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Tillery to play DT at ND

Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:02 pm
Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
12884 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:02 pm
LINK

I think this explains why we lost him. I doubt we were OK with him switching sides of the ball.
Posted by panzer
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
4034 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:09 pm to
yes it does....but we still LOST HIM
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37584 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:13 pm to
No..we lost him because he likes ND more

He would have been offered at QB by LSU if he wanted
Posted by LaBornNRaised
Loomis blows
Member since Feb 2011
11004 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:28 pm to
Yea we were the first school to offer him the chance to play DT. So your statement is false.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:33 pm to
Posted by Danny Woodhead
Member since Oct 2013
694 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

I think this explains why we lost him. I doubt we were OK with him switching sides of the ball.


Not at all buddy.

We were the first team to give him the opportunity to play on the D line.

Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
12884 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:37 pm to
All I read was how much we wanted him at OT. So I guess the answer is that another top in state prospect didn't want to play for Les. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Posted by sheeeeeit
Member since Sep 2013
1023 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 2:27 pm to
You are an idiot. The kid grew up a ND fan, it had nothing to do with an LSU coach.
Posted by sstig
Houston
Member since Oct 2003
2769 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 2:28 pm to
Tiger bait!
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 2:57 pm to
Oh good. I wanted him on the offensive line
Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
25946 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

All I read was how much we wanted him at OT. So I guess the answer is that another top in state prospect didn't want to play for Les. Thanks for clearing that up for me.



You people need Jesus.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 7:53 pm to
We don't really need him for DT anyway. We needed him more for OT down the road. Don't consider it a big loss if he wanted to play DT.
Posted by TBoy@LSU
Member since Sep 2012
5485 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 10:03 pm to
ND will tell him he can play RB if thats what it takes.
Posted by TerrebonneTiger35
Houma,La
Member since Dec 2012
192 posts
Posted on 1/2/15 at 11:35 am to
This is a mistake by the kid. He is an OT all the way. Size, strength, footwork all says he would be an elite OL at the next level.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram