- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Has Chief signed the deal yet?
Posted on 12/25/14 at 10:02 am
Posted on 12/25/14 at 10:02 am
Last i heard he still hasnt signed...
8
Posted on 12/25/14 at 10:03 am to dustytiger123
Nope :frownyface: :puckeredbunghole:
Posted on 12/25/14 at 10:49 am to dustytiger123
Yes
/thread
/thread
Posted on 12/25/14 at 10:56 am to Professor Parks
No he hasn't
Posted on 12/25/14 at 11:24 am to mattytiger123
Chavis to aggy
Posted on 12/25/14 at 11:52 am to texasaggie08
How many fawkin threads are yall going to start about Chevis if he signed or not?
Posted on 12/25/14 at 11:59 am to Double Oh
Just wait until it is official...then you'll really see some threads
Posted on 12/25/14 at 4:24 pm to dustytiger123
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/25/14 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 12/25/14 at 4:39 pm to dustytiger123
Once Michigan officially hires a coach not named Les Miles, all the assistants will sign their extensions. Chavis included.
This post was edited on 12/25/14 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 12/25/14 at 7:02 pm to texasaggie08
quote:
Just wait until it is official...then you'll really see some threads
Most of your brethren have accepted the reality of the situation. If he was leaving, he would have done it already. Delaying signing the extension doesn't hurt recruiting at LSU in any significant way.
However, if Chavis really were leaving to go to a place that has already lost its two best defensive recruits, he would already be gone, moved in, and busy preparing a post-dead period gameplan to salvage your defensive class. There are already MANY more reasons for him to stay at LSU rather than go. The fact that he isn't already gone and the growing disadvantage it would put him at is just one more. But it's a very telling one.
Posted on 12/26/14 at 3:15 am to misey94
You're talking logic to an Aggie football fan. You see that don't you?
Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:36 am to misey94
talk about seeing what you want to see...maybe he stays, maybe he goes, but he won't be coaching somewhere next year that hasn't given him 3 years guaranteed of 1.6-2m per year. Does lsu have the resources to make that happen? Aggy does
Posted on 12/26/14 at 7:38 am to misey94
we lost ONE potential commit...d Mack is no more or less likely to come than he ever was. So if losing one guy = our defensive recruiting class falling apart then...well, ok
This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 7:39 am
Posted on 12/26/14 at 8:04 am to texasaggie08
quote:
Does lsu have the resources to make that happen?
Are you trying to look stupid?
Posted on 12/26/14 at 8:25 am to George P Burdell
Why isnt the deal done then? should be pretty easy
Posted on 12/26/14 at 8:40 am to texasaggie08
I agree that there are a range of outcomes based on the (assumed) fact that it's not a done deal yet. However, none of those outcomes will have anything to do with a shortcoming of resources or a recognition of how to allocate them.
To suggest A&M can buy Chavis away from LSU is pretty spectacularly ill informed.
To suggest A&M can buy Chavis away from LSU is pretty spectacularly ill informed.
Posted on 12/26/14 at 8:51 am to jiffyjohnson
quote:
You're talking logic to an Aggie football fan. You see that don't you?
He might as well be discussing the virtues of heterosexuality for all the good it will do.
This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 9:49 am
Posted on 12/26/14 at 9:40 am to texasaggie08
To suggest Aggies football program is in another league than LSU's resources wise is delusional.
Forbes
It's no secret that LSU football is a hot property. According to Forbes Magazine's valuation, the Tigers come in at No. 5 in all of college football.
Forbes pegged the team's value at $103 million with revenue of $88 million and a profit of $50. The magazine gave LSU high marks for its contract which sends $7.2 million annually back to the school, not including the cost of scholarships.
Texas ($131 million) led the way once again, followed by LSU's Music City Bowl opponent Notre Dame (122M), Michigan (117M) and Alabama (107M) to round out the top 5.
Forbes
It's no secret that LSU football is a hot property. According to Forbes Magazine's valuation, the Tigers come in at No. 5 in all of college football.
Forbes pegged the team's value at $103 million with revenue of $88 million and a profit of $50. The magazine gave LSU high marks for its contract which sends $7.2 million annually back to the school, not including the cost of scholarships.
Texas ($131 million) led the way once again, followed by LSU's Music City Bowl opponent Notre Dame (122M), Michigan (117M) and Alabama (107M) to round out the top 5.
Posted on 12/26/14 at 9:59 am to safety_man
Don't spend any time on this conversation with aggy. They simply cannot understand basic finance. BUT ALL THAT OIL MONEY!
Posted on 12/26/14 at 10:09 am to GFaceKillah
Well if you think LSU has more money I don't know what to tell you...
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News