Started By
Message

re: Sharpton, Obama and Holder have blood on their hands

Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:07 pm to
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80155 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

quote:

He didn't make a political statement before murdering his GF that I know of, do you?


i didn't relaize that Obama, Deblasio, or Sharpton called for the murder of police

Maybe y'all should be blaming the rogue protesters or even Ice T since he wrote the song "cop killer".

criticizing the tactics of police =/= calling for their murder.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Wait = what 'aisle' are you talking about here?? This was a case of cold-bloodied unprovoked murder with an avowed intent to kill cops. I am on the other side of whatever "aisle" this is on. Are you on the same side of that "aisle" with the murderer?

You're being willfully obtuse here. Its quite clear what "aisle" refers to.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42608 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Its quite clear what "aisle" refers to.

Uh no - it is not at all clear.

If it is that clear, then articulate it. I was pretty clear in my description of ONE side of the "aisle" which you were so confident existed.

Please correct me if I got that wrong.

THIS is a clear cut case of cold-blooded murder - with printed intent to kill cops - just like the 'protesters' were chanting for - the same protesters that were supported by diBlasio,

PLEASE try to describe what aisle you are referring to.

If you are trying to equate this to an overall civil right issues, then you are just being intellectually dishonest - pathetically dishonest.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42608 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Do go on

you are dismissed, peanut brain. begone you insignificant little pimple.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111535 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

He didn't make a political statement before murdering his GF that I know of, do you?


So his motive for the murder earlier in the day was radically divergent from his later two murders? No sale.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105413 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:16 pm to
I'm sure you will be more pleased when more officers are slain.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123941 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

The police shooting was foretold on online social network sites. It was explained. Then it was accomplished in front of witnesses.
quote:

That doesn't mean you know anything about this either.
Well..........let's see.

(1) We know the police shooting was foretold on online social network sites.

(2) We know the reason for police shooting was explained on line.

(3) We know the murder occurred in front of witnesses.

(4) We know that #1, #2, and #3 expose your statement "you know anything about this either," as silliness.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80155 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

THIS is a clear cut case of cold-blooded murder - with printed intent to kill cops - just like the 'protesters' were chanting for - the same protesters that were supported by diBlasio,


So because you support a groups overarching cause for protesting, you automatically endorse the rogue individuals views withing that group

I thin Diblasio is a piece of shite, just like almost all other politicians, but I have not seen him say "I think people should kill cops in retaliation"

Y'all are looking for scapegoats for a piece of shite criminal who killed 3 innocent people.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33419 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

just like the 'protesters' were chanting for - the same protesters that were supported by diBlasio,


Link?
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

Uh no - it is not at all clear.

It is for everybody else who followed the dialogue, but I guess I'll explain it simply for you:

Tragedy involving guns occurs --> those for gun control use this is as an opportunity to speak out against guns

This is what has been described as "never letting a tragedy go to waste." Have you heard of that before on this board? Whats happening here is....

Tragedy involving police occurs--> those who dislike Obama, etc use this as an opportunity to speak out against Obama, etc

Its the exact same, just "different sides of aisle." I'm not sure I can break this down for you further.
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31636 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:19 pm to
Yeah, I haven't heard any public figures even saying things as bad about cops as I have read on this board.

Dude flipped out and went with the flavor of the day.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80155 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

I'm sure you will be more pleased when more officers are slain.


Yes, you got me.... Because I haven't stated over and over again that the gunman is a piece of shite for killing innocent people

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111535 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:20 pm to
The outrage that so many have here would be useful fighting for justice rather than fighting for "things with which I agree."
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

criticizing the tactics of police =/= calling for their murder.
This. All the wigging out on the right is just so much hypocrisy.

It's like saying anyone who criticizes our military interventions overseas is a terrorist enabler who cheers when ISIS slits throats.
This post was edited on 12/20/14 at 9:23 pm
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105413 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Yes, you got me


I know
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31636 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:28 pm to
What is justice? Something you agree with?
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19309 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Its too bad he took his own life and didn't get to suffer for his crimes


I think he's doing quite a bit of suffering as we speak. With no end in sight.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123941 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

I thin Diblasio is a piece of shite, just like almost all other politicians, but I have not seen him say "I think people should kill cops in retaliation"
Just as the man who yells "FIRE" in a crowded theater never said "I think people should trample people at the movies"?
This post was edited on 12/21/14 at 6:30 am
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42608 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

It is for everybody else who followed the dialogue, but I guess I'll explain it simply for you:

Tragedy involving guns occurs --> those for gun control use this is as an opportunity to speak out against guns

This is what has been described as "never letting a tragedy go to waste." Have you heard of that before on this board? Whats happening here is....

Tragedy involving police occurs--> those who dislike Obama, etc use this as an opportunity to speak out against Obama, etc

Its the exact same, just "different sides of aisle." I'm not sure I can break this down for you further.


sorry - this is quite different than a gun-control debate or a civil rights debate.

I don't see how you can conflate it into either of those two genuinely debatable issues.

THIS is about the actions of the MAYOR of NYC in siding with the protestors in opposition to a grand jury decision within his own city and siding with the protesters against the police force that he serves as commander-in-chief.

Regardless of the 'side of the aisle' he falls on relating to the overall political debate regarding either of those two issues, it is his JOB to support his own police force unless there is clear indications of their malfeasance.

IF you cannot see that his outspoken support of the protesters calling for dead cops, and his dismissal of the professionalism of his police force was not a MAJOR factor in influencing this unstable criminal to go and act out what the protesters were calling for = DEAD COPS.

If you cannot see that, you are pathetically dishonest.

We can have the nuanced debate over civil rights and second amendment any time you want, but you are smart enough to know that Blasio has the rhetorical 'blood on his hands' over his actions the past few weeks.

he should resign - or be impeached.

Obama, et al are secondarily culpable. IF Obama had come out early and condemned the false narrative of the Michael Brown affair, perhaps Blasio would not have been encouraged to go all in supporting the protesters of the Eric Garner (and MB) case.
This post was edited on 12/20/14 at 9:37 pm
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80155 posts
Posted on 12/20/14 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

IF you cannot see that his outspoken support of the protesters calling for dead cops, and his dismissal of the professionalism of his police force was not a MAJOR factor in influencing this unstable criminal to go and act out what the protesters were calling for = DEAD COPS.


Again, saying you support protestors disagreements with police tactics =\= support for killing cops. I don't remember seeing one organized protest that was rallied around killing cops. There were rogue social media people calling for it, but not like you are claiming.

So then you are 100% cool with putting fault on Cruz or Rand if a rogue group of tea party protestors goes off and kills someone? Since you know, they support the tea party

Again, y'all are looking for a scapegoat for a piece of shite. Y'all are trying to legitimize this psychos actions.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram