- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/19/14 at 4:16 pm to ballscaster
Go learn how to read:
quote:
Good God, you actually think there is something you could tell Miles, Cam and the other offensive coaches that they don't already know!
quote:
Even when his ultimate decision does not work or your conclusion does work, your judgment is still not as accurate as his.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 4:21 pm to inadaze
quote:When you read that and then interpret it as this:
quote:
Good God, you actually think there is something you could tell Miles, Cam and the other offensive coaches that they don't already know!
quote:
Even when his ultimate decision does not work or your conclusion does work, your judgment is still not as accurate as his.
quote:...you are telling a lie. Either that, or you need to
he can't be told anything he doesn't know, and when he's wrong, he's actually right
quote:
Go learn how to read:
This post was edited on 12/19/14 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 12/19/14 at 4:29 pm to ballscaster
I've already tried to explain it to you. This is a very unpleasant exchange, and you don't have the comprehension and/or willingness to progress with this. Bye.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 4:36 pm to inadaze
quote:I know. You lied.
I've already tried to explain it to you.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 4:54 pm to ballscaster
You really want to continue with this, huh?
What is it? Do you genuinely not understand, or do you just want to feel satisfied by getting the last word?
Do you really not see how that matches up? If not, go ahead and explain what you're confused about, and I'll try to help you.
If you do understand what I'm talking about, but you're just trying to be cute, then you're pathetic, and I don't want to spend any more time playing this stupid game with you.
What is it? Do you genuinely not understand, or do you just want to feel satisfied by getting the last word?
quote:
Good God, you actually think there is something you could tell Miles, Cam and the other offensive coaches that they don't already know!
quote:
can't be told anything he doesn't know
quote:
Even when his ultimate decision does not work or your conclusion does work, your judgment is still not as accurate as his.
quote:
when he's wrong, he's actually right
Do you really not see how that matches up? If not, go ahead and explain what you're confused about, and I'll try to help you.
If you do understand what I'm talking about, but you're just trying to be cute, then you're pathetic, and I don't want to spend any more time playing this stupid game with you.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 4:59 pm to inadaze
You're arguing with a total brick wall. There's no reasoning with the moron. Save your breath.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 5:18 pm to inadaze
quote:Another lie. I'll overlook this one, though.
Bye.
You're being selective about what parts of the fans' rhetoric you're using, and you're using your selection to fit your own lie. I'll bold some things myself so that you can see what I mean.
quote:
Good God, you actually think there is something you could tell Miles, Cam and the other offensive coaches that they don't already know!
quote:The former quote is by a fan who has used you as the subject of the sentence. You eliminate that aspect of the fan's criticism of you in the latter quote, using a passive predicate phrase, "can't be told," as to change the subject of the fan's quote from you to Miles. The fan is telling you that you have a ridiculously high opinion of yourself, so much so that you actually think there is something you could tell Miles, Cam and the other offensive coaches that they don't already know.
can't be told anything he doesn't know
quote:
Even when his ultimate decision does not work or your conclusion does work, your judgment is still not as accurate as his.
quote:The fan in the former quote places your judgment in the subject. In the latter quote, you just make shite up. The fan did not say that when he's wrong, he's actually right; nay, the fan said that your judgment is still not as accurate as his.
when he's wrong, he's actually right
Miles isn't infallible. He is just less fallible than you.
Miles isn't right when he's wrong. He just knows what he's doing a lot more than you do.
Suck my balls.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 5:30 pm to ballscaster
Not less fallible when it comes to beating Bama though is he chief?
And for the record, I could coach us to a last minute loss.....no problemo!
Suck on that shitehead!
And for the record, I could coach us to a last minute loss.....no problemo!
Suck on that shitehead!
Posted on 12/19/14 at 5:33 pm to RedTigerRulz
quote:He is .455 vs. Bama. You are .000. So, no.
Not less fallible when it comes to beating Bama though is he chief?
quote:But nobody cares.
And for the record, I could coach us to a last minute loss.....no problemo!
Posted on 12/19/14 at 5:48 pm to inadaze
quote:
or critical,
That's a real shocker.
quote:
or original
There are no original thoughts here that haven't been expressed countless times. There are those who think their post are original.
quote:
his decision is still superior, based solely on his position of authority.
Don't be silly. CH, GN, and MA all had positions of authority. It's not the position, it's the freaking results. If you want to feel you have insight into the LSU football program that those on the LSU staff don't have, knock yourself out. I don't think you have that ability and nothing you have posted demonstrates such an ability.
quote:
dismiss all of their opinions
Of the dismissing opinions, it seems to me that the "critical" types do that a lot more than the "pumpers", but each to our own.
I don't know why that emoticons on a LSU forum would be a problem for anyone, but
Posted on 12/19/14 at 5:56 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Another lie. I'll overlook this one, though.
Changing one's mind =/= a lie. You should be more respectful about making dumb accusations.
quote:
The former quote is by a fan who has used you as the subject of the sentence.
Wrong. And I already explained that. What the frick is your issue with reading comprehension?
That post was in response to the original poster! Now -- tell me -- did you tell a lie, or are you just plain fricking retarded?
So, with that utter bullshite, you've fricked up your whole explanation:
quote:
You eliminate that aspect of the fan's criticism of you in the latter quote, using a passive predicate phrase, "can't be told," as to change the subject of the fan's quote from you to Miles. The fan is telling you that you have a ridiculously high opinion of yourself, so much so that you actually think there is something you could tell Miles, Cam and the other offensive coaches that they don't already know.
Let me explain what really happened -- LSU Groupee posted that to ItsThatDude12 -- I then commented on that ridiculous general attitude -- the attitude that posters can't be critical because they wouldn't be able to tell Miles something he doesn't already know. And it is a general attitude about posters on this board, fool, because later, Groupee posted in response to me and included himself in his explanation that posters wouldn't be able to tell Miles something that he doesn't already know.
Do you now see how fricking stupid your drivel looks, and how if you would've taken the time to read, you could have cleared this up for yourself?
quote:
The fan in the former quote places your judgment in the subject. In the latter quote, you just make shite up. The fan did not say that when he's wrong, he's actually right; nay, the fan said that your judgment is still not as accurate as his.
That's what all of this is about -- posters' judgments/opinions in relation to Miles'. This post was also not directed at me. And don't try to extrapolate my words to mean outside the context of this board. All of these goofy appeals to authority have happened in exchanges on this board.
Right is a common synonym for accurate, you fricking idiot. Within the context of conversations on this board, Miles is always in the right under these parameters. When something does not work, it is essentially wrong, but under these circumstances, Miles is always in the clear.
This post was edited on 12/19/14 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 12/19/14 at 6:03 pm to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
I don't know why that emoticons on a LSU forum would be a problem for anyone
You keep saying I have a problem when I clearly don't. I already said it's fine.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 6:12 pm to inadaze
quote:Nah. You lied, and you're mad about it. Go away. You didn't go to LSU, and you lie about LSU, its team, and its fans. You suck.
Let me explain what really happened
Posted on 12/19/14 at 6:13 pm to ballscaster
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/19/14 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 12/19/14 at 6:22 pm to inadaze
What'd I tell ya. Dude lives up there in that schit hole Brighton beach, so far away from TS, he's prolly forgot what it looks like and he's going to lecture anyone on their fandom. What a joke! 
Posted on 12/20/14 at 11:00 am to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
That's a real shocker.
It looks like this thread is not going to be deleted, so I'll try to explain this -- it seems that you interpret critical as something very negative -- I'm not talking about unwarranted criticism that lacks substance and is just negative. I'm talking about criticism that may be negative, or it may be constructive criticism with more of a positive slant. I'm talking about discussing alternative strategies for success. Oftentimes when posters attempt to discuss those types of things, it is met with a dismissive attitude and/or ridicule right out of the gate. It's not like we're talking about some esoteric field of knowledge where it makes much more sense to almost always trust experts. We're talking about football. A game that most people on this board have probably been playing and watching since childhood. People can see the games with their own eyes and form their own opinions on things. Then those opinions can be talked about, or argued about, and others can be critical of the critical opinion. As I've said, my issue is with people that don't even deal with the substance of the opinion. Instead they try to immediately dismiss a critical opinion on the basis of an appeal to authority.
Posted on 12/20/14 at 2:39 pm to ballscaster
quote:
ballscaster
And to try to provide further clarification on the other issue -- LSU Groupee used the word "you" in his sentence the way that people often use "one" in academic writing. It's common to do that on this board. He certainly was not referring to "me" when he said "you" (again, the post wasn't even in response to "me"). He was using it generally to refer to posters on this board. And that was further established when he included himself and "me" in a later hypothetical in which he slightly altered his position to provide a small possibility that a poster could tell the coaches something that they don't already know. My post that you attempted (and failed) to pick apart was written within the context of this board, and within the context of Groupee's hypothetical:
quote:
you actually think there is something you could tell Miles
We're dealing with an ostensibly hypothetical situation within the context of this board.
Groupee's post that I commented on was written loosely with sarcasm. My comments in response were also written loosely (I probably should have used the contraction couldn't instead of can't to keep my comments aligned with Groupee's better), and were slightly hyperbolic, but not extremely hyperbolic, and I will explain why -- let's set up two hypothetical parameters for "me" on this board:
1. Posters on this board couldn't tell "me" something I don't already know.
2. If I do make a mistake, or my decision/idea does not work, and/or someone else's decision/idea does work (i.e., I am wrong and they are right), they are still not as accurate (right) as I am.
Now a question -- with these parameters in place -- can I ever be wrong about something on this board? The answer is no (because even if I am ostensibly wrong, I am still in the right).
I am not megalomaniacal, so even if offered, I would not agree to these parameters.
This situation illustrated how, in some ways, this type of forum can be awkward and confusing. The confusion is augmented when people are more interested in being "right" than actually understanding what was really said, the gist, the context, etc. You seemed to be so worked up about this that you couldn't stay on track, and you made things confusing that didn't even have to be. I had already explained to you that the posts were not written in response to me. You either missed that, or forgot about it, or tried to "lie" about it to seem "right." Either way, it's clear, you were more interested in being "right" than you were in truly understanding the situation, and you ended up being "wrong."
Page 37 of 37
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News