Started By
Message
locked post

26 of 119 Found Improperly Detained

Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:34 am
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7771 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:34 am
quote:

Twenty-six of the CIA's 119 detainees "did not meet the ... standard for detention," according to the report.
One of these improperly detained individuals, Abu Hudhaifa, endured 66 hours of standing sleep deprivation and ice water baths "before being released because the CIA discovered he was likely not the person he was believed to be." A second "intellectually challenged" individual was detained and used "as leverage" against a family member. Two more spent 24 hours chained in the standing sleep deprivation position, until CIA Headquarters "confirmed that the detainees were former CIA sources," who had previously reached out to the CIA to try to share intelligence.

ABC News' Martha Raddatz, Ely Brown, Ali Weinberg, Luis Martinez, Jeff Zeleny, Cindy Smith, Stephanie Smith, Avery Miller, Arlette Saenz, Robin Gradison, Ariane DeVogue, and Alex Mallin contributed to this report.


LINK

Seems like a lot of torture supporters just kinda skip over this and say something like "ohh well, we can't get them all right".

This is a 20% error rate........and we're talking about detaining and torturing people here. Is there a percentage at which this becomes unacceptable or is 75% ok as long as we get a few scraps of good intel?

At what point do we stop being the good guys? Does anyone care?
Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:36 am to
quote:

At what point do we stop being the good guys?


The day Obama was elected.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51807 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:36 am to
I'm sorry, but I have no issue with this. If all this save just ONE innocent life, then it was worth it.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28822 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Seems like a lot of torture supporters just kinda skip over this and say something like "ohh well, we can't get them all right".
It would be awesome if mistakes aren't made during times of war. Do you feel the same outrage about Obama's drone war? Far more innocent people have been killed than the 26 detainees that were tortured and still alive.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:41 am to
No problem with it. I bet if any of these progressives had a loved one in peril and could only save them with information from someone they had chained up, the blow torches would come out fast
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80272 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:46 am to
quote:

I'm sorry, but I have no issue with this. If all this save just ONE innocent life, then it was worth it.




What about the 26 innocent lives identified in the report?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68314 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:46 am to
Don't be naive, the US has done things like this since its founding. It just didn't get blasted nationwide because of partisan politics and media oneupsmanship.

In the midst of war, mistakes happen, they always do. The dems knew this would incite anger amongst people who lead comfortable lives never having to be responsible for a nation's defense and watch the sausage get made.

And about not being the good guys, don't be such an easily lead nave. Listen to the navy seal's story about the raid on Bin Laden's compound and how, in the stress of that mission the Americans made sure to place the children encountered during the raid with females also in the compound.
Posted by Bamadiver
Member since Jun 2014
3226 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:49 am to
If anything, the fact that the CIA bothered to pursue confirmation of identities is a good thing. How easy would it have been just to make them disappear, or lop their heads off? How many countries in a time of war would even bother to care?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68314 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:50 am to
None would care. Only the evil USA.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:55 am to
Maybe they will start policing themselves now and when a terrorist shows up in their back yard, instead of turning a blind eye, they turn his arse in.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Seems like a lot of torture supporters just kinda skip over this and say something like "ohh well, we can't get them all right".


You're right. Obama's way is better. Drone them to death, no interrogation, no intelligence gathering possible. And if they're not the right guy? They won't be around to complain to anyone about it.

quote:

as long as we get a few scraps


Like Bin Laden?

quote:

At what point do we stop being the good guys? Does anyone care?


When we start ACTUALLY torturing people - like pulling out fingernails, flaying, boiling alive, breaking bones, burning, etc.

Not keeping them up for days, thermostat adjustments, and other stuff we subject our men and women in uniform to.

Waterboarding is at the line, but at some point, you have to do what you have to do.

I hate that these "innocent" cats got caught up in this, but it is a war. I feel bad for all the Japanese civilians who got killed in the 1940s. Doesn't make us the bad guys, though.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51296 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:57 am to
quote:

I'm sorry, but I have no issue with this. If all this save just ONE innocent life, then it was worth it.


One innocent American life is more valuable than 26 innocent non-American lives?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:01 am to
quote:

This is a 20% error rate........


There was a 100% mortality rate of those 3,000 that died on 9/11/01.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64379 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:02 am to
Ice water and no sleep?

This should not be called torture. I don't know what to call it perhaps severe interrogation techniques.


And if that rate is true its very poor work by someone and should not be the norm.

Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

One innocent American life is more valuable than 26 innocent non-American lives?


Yes
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51296 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

There was a 100% mortality rate of those 3,000 that died on 9/11/01.


Two wrongs don't make a right.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68314 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:07 am to
It says 26 didn't meet criteria. That's not the same as innocent.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Two wrongs don't make a right.


When the first wrong murders 3,000 people and causes all the damage that it did from that wrong, I lose absolutely no sleep of the second alleged wrong.
Posted by CherryGarciaMan
Sugar Magnolia
Member since Aug 2012
2497 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

AUbused



Those detained were of the wrong color and religion.

No cares were given.

But, there was a great speech by McCain yesterday on the Senate floor about our policy:

FoxNews for the conservative idealogues
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:15 am to
Why does the CIA have any authority to detain anyone? Anyone detained is either a prisoner of war, a suspected war criminal or a suspected spy. During WWII all of the above were detained by the military or the FBI. Why must the CIA be involved in anything except the analysis of information obtained by the military or law enforcement?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram