Statistic Regarding the % of Grand Juries Who Render an Indictment

If this were a normal saw it would of never made it to grand jury!

It did just to show and expose the truth and to leave no doubt about lying witnesses that the media swarmed on.

quote:

---

If this were a normal saw it would of never made it to grand jury!

---

I'm going to guess a civilian would have had more of a legal problem if he'd shot Brownie.

Doesn't that call for more intense scrunity of the grand jury process, since an non indictment is so rare?

This DA has indicted a cop killer once in 4 tries, plus his daddy got killed by a Black man in the 60s. We say all these cases are antecodal, and should not play a part in any decisions making..but we are all humans. So to think we don't detach our own personal sentiments from fact is just ignorant of the basic human condition.

The assistants DA gave the jury old outdated and constitutional law about cops rights to shoot fleeing subjects right before Wilsons testimony. But they came back a couple weeks later and presented them with the new updated and constitutional law. When asked to explain the differences in the old and new law, she refused to do so.

So what premise did the jury's judge the law and facts under ? That's debatable, but the law must meet his facts. This is one example where vagueness may have helped push this case to a non indictment (in addition to the DAs odd behavior of not giving the jurors a set of penalties to think about indicting Wilson on)

quote:

---

StrongSafety

---

Still waiting on an answer

Lol

Do you just make shite up? You need to be interviewed by cnn

Nope!

Everyone has a right to defend themselves.

As has been said, the DA did not want to seek an indictment. His view was no charges were necessary. The grand jury was simply to appease race baiters and the emotionally irrational. Whether he was successful or not is obviously up for debate.

Imo, Wilson actually suffered more scrutiny than normal because the da's actions increased the chances he would be indicted by bringing it before the grand jury in the first place. He was not afforded more beneficial due process as you claim.

quote:

---

The victim's coroner got a tougher cross-examination than the defendant.

---

I'm guessing you don't know much about the victim's "coroner". Here's a little bit of useful information.

quote:

---

Parcells doesn’t claim to have any specific license or certification to do the work he does. He knows how to do autopsies from “on-the-job training,” watching pathologists and assisting them at various morgues, he said. Sometimes he’s been paid for this work and sometimes he wasn’t, he added.

---

quote:

---

“First of all, I’m Professor Shawn Parcells,” Parcells said as he stood to address the reporters.

On his LinkedIn page and to CNN, Parcells said he’s an adjunct professor at Washburn University in Topeka, Kansas — but a spokeswoman for the university told CNN that’s not true.

“(Parcells) is not now and has never been a member of the Washburn University faculty,” university spokeswoman Michaela Saunders wrote in an email to CNN, adding that at one point, Parcells spoke without receiving pay to two groups of nursing students about the role of a pathologist’s assistant and gave a PowerPoint presentation and answered students’ questions.

---

LINK

*hasnt. A cop that has killed a citizen