- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fetuses,’ ‘Infants’ Not People Because They ‘Cannot Talk’
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:31 pm
LINK
Some actors and actressss would do best to live by the saying," Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt."
Some actors and actressss would do best to live by the saying," Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt."
16
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:34 pm to Revelator
That comment was stupid as hell, but she was hot as frick in The Big Easy.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:34 pm to Revelator
That's not actually what was said
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:34 pm to Revelator
I would like to say she is rich and doesn't live in the same world that some of us live in, but her thoughts on abortion shouldn't be so far off the wall in the way they are just because of a little wealth.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:35 pm to Revelator
In fairness, I believe she was saying fetuses were not babies or infants. Not that babies or infants were not "persons."
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:36 pm to Revelator
quote:
“News flash...a fetus cannot talk,” Barkin tweeted. “It is not a person. Not even a baby, not even an infant. Nope. Sorry.”
Admittedly, I cant see the photoed tweets on the page because they are blocked, but I infer that she is saying that a fetus is not a baby, nor is it an infant. I don't think she is saying that a baby or an infant isn't a person
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:36 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
That's not actually what was said
..
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:37 pm to Revelator
I've really never understood the fervent campaigns to kill an unborn, living human being.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:37 pm to Revelator
Well, it's true.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:38 pm to Revelator
quote:While this is an incredibly stupid argument, EVERYONE who is pro-choice believes some form of it. Not necessarily that ability to talk differentiates person from non-person, but that infants and fetuses are not people for some other reason.
‘Infants’ Not People Because They ‘Cannot Talk’
You cannot be pro choice unless you believe that a baby in the womb is not a person.
I can think of one other time in American History when a certain policy was defended on the grounds that the "subjects" it hurt were not people. Actually, fetuses aren't even considered 3/5th of a person...
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:38 pm to Revelator
quote:
‘Infants’ Not People Because They ‘Cannot Talk’
Not what she said...but putting that aside, what is this emblematic of? She's just some woman who plays dress up...she's not even famous anymore (not that it would even matter. Why do you care what actors think?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:38 pm to Vols&Shaft83
A fetus has a heart beat though. And so does a baby, infant, toddler, and unfortunately adults like her.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:39 pm to Revelator
I really don't pay any attention to what old white Hollywood ladies say.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:39 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Do I need to do a word by word comparison for ya farva? Maybe you can start by telling us where the word 'because' is in the twitter post you illiterate numb nutz. Read the comments further up if you still don't get it.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:39 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
While this is an incredibly stupid argument, EVERYONE who is pro-choice believes some form of it. Not necessarily that ability to talk differentiates person from non-person, but that infants and fetuses are not people for some other reason.
Did you read the tweet? No. And your statement is as stupid as the imagined statement by Barkin.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:40 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Do I need to do a word by word comparison for ya farva? Maybe you can start by telling us where the word 'because' is in the twitter post you illiterate numb nutz. Read the comments further up if you still don't get it.
I just posted the twitter post, CALM DOWN YOU FAT frickING IDIOT
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:no. That's not even what the twitter comment is saying. My lord is it possible you can be this dumb and have a heartbeat yourself?
quote:
‘Infants’ Not People Because They ‘Cannot Talk’
While this is an incredibly stupid argument, EVERYONE who is pro-choice believes some form of it.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Sure you can. Rothbard's evictionist position is an example.
You cannot be pro choice unless you believe that a baby in the womb is not a person.
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:42 pm to Superior Pariah
quote:I volunteer my Sundays at an organization called Miracle League. We allow special needs kids to get on the baseball field and play around. Many of the kids are severely physically handicapped to the point where they can't even open their mouths. I don't think they, nor their parents, would appreciate you arguing that they are not a person.
Well, it's true.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:44 pm to Revelator
10 pages
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News