- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Shouldn't Salary Scale with Results?
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:58 am
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:58 am
So, we have one of the highest paid offensive coordinators in college football and we run the ball 70% of the time, despite having elite athletes all over the field. And when we do run the football, we do so less imaginatively and with less misdirection than virtually any other team in D1. Only the service academies have less balance on the offense than LSU.
How's this possible?
How's this possible?
This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 9:01 am
8
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:59 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
Alter.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:59 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
you and this same tired post can both go frick yourselves
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:01 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
The evidence of the last hundred years of coaching disagrees with you.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:02 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
How does 70% running=results
I'm confused
I'm confused
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:04 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
Excellent thread.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:05 am to jimbeam
70% running is a manifestation of the results, which is a shitty, unbalanced, uncreative, non-adaptive offense.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:12 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
Go to you local pawn shop and ask for the "We Clean Up the Mess!!! 1 Bullet Special"
$19.95 Click. Bang. Thump.
$19.95 Click. Bang. Thump.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:12 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
Cheating scales with results > salary scale with results
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:20 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
quote:
70% of this post is a manifestation of the results, which is a shitty, unbalanced, uncreative, non-adaptive OP.
FIFY
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:24 am to mikrit54
Alrighty then. No one disputes that guys are getting overpaid to do a remarkably banal job. Thanks for playing.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:43 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
Nope. You missed the point dick face. I'm. Not surprised.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:45 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
quote:
Shouldn't Salary Scale with Results?
If your agent is a moron, sure. Why not
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:45 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
quote:im disputing that. they're paid what the best coaches get paid. you don't have the slightest clue as to how hard it is to consistently win on this level. every good thing people are saying about mullen and freeze this year they were saying about sumlin last year, and it will probably shift over to bielema next year.
No one disputes that guys are getting overpaid to do a remarkably banal job.
meanwhile, Miles is going for win 102 in nine and a half seasons.
This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 9:46 am
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:53 am to MastrShake
I never mentioned Miles. I simply asked why our offensive coordinator gets paid an inordinately high salary to coordinate an offense as complex as my high school's. And I don't think Mullen or Freeze are necessarily better coaches than Miles, but they undoubtedly are better OFFENSIVE coaches. Is that even controversial to claim?
Posted on 10/21/14 at 9:58 am to Cleetus_VanDamme
Could we not pay a less high profile offensive coordinator to do the job that's currently being done? I'm not saying fire Cameron or cut his salary - that's not happening and that's not how it works. But it's a serious question to ask if we're going to win the philosophy of Miles, which is defensible, then why spend so much on an OC when it's not necessary and it doesn't change the results on the field much?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News