Started By
Message

.

Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:52 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:52 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 4:42 am
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:53 pm to
hard to say without seeing their complete roster but I don't see a problem with it
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:54 pm to
I'm not going to bother because I have players to replace luck, he has players to replace SSsr and bell.

I just want to know if it is equitable
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38409 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

hard to say without seeing their complete roster but I don't see a problem with it

Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28724 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:57 pm to
looks fine to me.
Posted by NOFLyZ0ne28
West Florida
Member since Apr 2014
876 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 2:13 pm to
Yes. But I'd much rather the SS/Bell side of it.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 2:31 pm to
that's the side I'm on. I drafted bust after bust in my 8 man league.

I have a huge hole at receiver and cobb is on a crazy TD streak but has only given me 100 yards once (5 point bonus for 100 yards receiving or rushing) so I need a WR who gets targeted heavily.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 2:32 pm to
and we just hashed it out so I give him tate instead of lacy so

tate/luck for bell/Smith Sr.

Equitable and mutually beneficial.

I need a better distribution of points and I think it's a matter of time before bell's TDs complement his yards
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram