Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Malala Wins The 2014 Nobel Peace Prize

Posted on 10/10/14 at 6:41 am
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 6:41 am
Along with an Indian guy named Kailash Satyarthi

LINK
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123951 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Malala Wins The 2014 Nobel Peace Prize

A year too late
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 6:58 am to
I agree, but better late than never. She's definitely the antithesis of ISIS - a shining example of Muslim enlightenment, tolerance and feminism.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Malala Wins The 2014 Nobel Peace Prize
Damn! Now even Obama's daughters are winning Nobel Peace Prizes!!
Posted by Jarlaxle
Calimport
Member since Dec 2010
2869 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Damn! Now even Obama's daughters are winning Nobel Peace Prizes!!


Its in their blood to save the world from its self.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 9:08 am to
After obama won one the associated farce rendered them meaningless.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51690 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 9:15 am to
Posted by Radiojones
The Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2007
10728 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 9:16 am to
I still have no idea why he won it.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I still have no idea why he won it.

I have an idea, but it wasn't based on merit, but neither was Al Gore's award, which even at face value had nothing to do with peace. Of course some people will point to Yasir Arafat, Menachem Begin and Nelson Mandela as unworthy, but at least those guys made actual peace deals.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 10:24 am to
from the Nobel Peace Prize Committee's website: LINK

quote:

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons. ( Russia's nuclear arsonal now larger than the U.S., 10/3/14)

Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. (Obama did not seek UN approval to bomb Libya or Syria.)

Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. (There are more nuclear weapons in the world today than when Obama took office.)


Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

(Obama did not seek UN approval to bomb Libya or Syria.)

The UN did approve the bombing of Libya and Obama never bombed Syria.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 10:40 am to
quote:

The UN did approve the bombing of Libya
Not according to the links I found when I googled.

quote:

and Obama never bombed Syria.
He's bombing them almost everyday now.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Obama never bombed Syria.




Are you blind?


In other news, why Pope Francis didn't win:

LINK

quote:

No prize to a pope – he said – until the Church has brought up to date its magisterium on contraception.



This post was edited on 10/10/14 at 12:40 pm
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 12:45 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/10/14 at 12:45 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64385 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 12:48 pm to
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Not according to the links I found when I googled.

Check out UN Resolution 1973 which authorized "a no-fly zone and air strikes against Muammar Gaddafi".

LINK

quote:

He's bombing them almost everyday now.

He's bombing Syria now with the consent of the Syrian government but he didn't bomb Syria last year when he was contemplating doing it. Similarly, we are also bombing Iraq with the consent of its government. You don't need UN authorization to take military action in a nation if its internationally-recognized government consents to it.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/10/14 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

He's bombing Syria now with the consent of the Syrian government


quote:

— The US notified Syria that it was going to strike ISIS. The Syrian government did not grant formal permission for the strikes in its territory,
LINK
quote:

The Obama administration said that they have the right to strike forces whomever they declare to be the enemy in Syria without the consent of the Syrian government and, in fact, they made it clear they will not work with the Syrian government.
LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram